For the gaslighted mental cases on the left who think Matt is a sex trafficker - Justice Department drops sex trafficking probe of Rep. Matt Gaetz

Poor Richard Saunders said:
No. It means there IS evidence and if there IS evidence it is not the same thing as no evidence.
Click to expand...

There is no evidence of a crime which is why there were no charges. Now you can continue pounding your tiny, insignificant little fists onto the table, but it doesn't make you look less triggered, unhinged or stupid.

Poor Richard Saunders said:
Facts are facts.
Click to expand...

Indeed; which is why no charges were filed mental case. :laugh:

Poor Richard Saunders said:
Let's see if I can put it in perspective for you. Since no court found there was enough election fraud to affect the outcome of the 2020 election, does that mean there was no evidence of election fraud? Not enough evidence is the same thing as no evidence, correct?
Click to expand...

What courts actually listened to evidence regarding election fraud in 2020? Link me to one.

Amusing that low IQ dotards like you who vote for idiots like Kamala think that jurists overturning state legislatures and inventing election law from the bunch is indicative of an honest election. :laugh:
 
Poor Richard Saunders said:
No. It is uncorroborated witness testimony not hearsay. (In this case 2 people actually testified to seeing Gaetz having sex with the 17 year old. I believe one of them was the 17 year old.)
Click to expand...

:lolup: Doesn't comprehend what uncorroborated witness testimony means. :laugh:

Poor Richard Saunders said:
Let's put it into perspective again. If you think there is no evidence to support an eyewitness testimony makes the eyewitness testimony hearsay then all those people that signed affidavits claiming election fraud were only hearsay and the courts can just ignore them since hearsay is not accepted in courts. Congratulations, you have just made the claim there is no evidence of election fraud in 2020.
Click to expand...

What a moronic statement. But alas, you're a moron as evidenced by your votes for Biden and Kamala.
 
Poor Richard Saunders said:
First of all the FBI never said that Gaetz was exonerated. Then you admit they continued to investigate even after prosecutors said there wasn't enough evidence to convict beyond a reasonable doubt proving that the FBI didn't exonerate him.

The standard for declining prosecution is not "nothing is found". The standard for prosecution is the evidence should be sufficient to obtain and sustain a prosecution.
Click to expand...
Give it up for fuck sakes. The man isn't guilty of tooling your grand daughter and is going to lead the prosecution of all the criminals from the last administration.

It's going to be FUCKING glorious between him, Elon and Vivek and Tom Homan!! There's a deal that needs squaring up and it's coming soon!!
 
Truth Detector said:
There is no evidence of a crime which is why there were no charges. Now you can continue pounding your tiny, insignificant little fists onto the table, but it doesn't make you look less triggered, unhinged or stupid.



Indeed; which is why no charges were filed mental case. :laugh:



What courts actually listened to evidence regarding election fraud in 2020? Link me to one.

Amusing that low IQ dotards like you who vote for idiots like Kamala think that jurists overturning state legislatures and inventing election law from the bunch is indicative of an honest election. :laugh:
Click to expand...
LOL. I guess you haven't actually looked at the court cases if you think none of them looked at the affidavits.
Here is one -

Plaintiffs made only a claim and offered no evidence to support their assertions.


Here is another
archive.org

Opinion and Order Denying Motion for Injunctive Relief, Protective Order, and Independent Audit : Timothy M. Kenny : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive

Opinion written by Timothy M. Kenny, Chief Judge of the Third Judicial Circuit Court of Michigan, in the case of Costantino v. City of Detroit, et al, Case No....
archive.org
 
Joe said:
Give it up for fuck sakes. The man isn't guilty of tooling your grand daughter and is going to lead the prosecution of all the criminals from the last administration.

It's going to be FUCKING glorious between him, Elon and Vivek and Tom Homan!! There's a deal that needs squaring up and it's coming soon!!
Click to expand...
I doubt he will get enough Senators to vote to confirm him.
 
Truth Detector said:

Justice Department drops sex trafficking probe of Rep. Matt Gaetz without charges, lawyers say​

WASHINGTON – The Justice Department has formally decided not to charge firebrand Republican Rep. Matt Gaetz in a sex trafficking investigation, the lawmaker's lawyers said Wednesday.

"We have just spoken with the DOJ and have been informed that they have concluded their investigation into Congressman Gaetz and allegations related to sex trafficking and obstruction of justice, and they have determined not to bring any charges against him," attorneys Marc Mukasey and Isabelle Kirshner said.

www.usatoday.com

Justice Department drops sex trafficking probe of Rep. Matt Gaetz without charges, lawyers say

The investigation coincided with Matt Gaetz’s rise to prominence as a vocal supporter of Donald Trump and antagonist to congressional Democrats.
www.usatoday.com
Click to expand...
But his own political party has been busy investigating him for the last year and half, not Democrats, Republicans, House Republicans at that, doesn’t seem as if everyone thinks Matt is an alter boy
 
Poor Richard Saunders said:
LOL. I guess you haven't actually looked at the court cases if you think none of them looked at the affidavits.
Here is one -

Plaintiffs made only a claim and offered no evidence to support their assertions.


Here is another
archive.org

Opinion and Order Denying Motion for Injunctive Relief, Protective Order, and Independent Audit : Timothy M. Kenny : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive

Opinion written by Timothy M. Kenny, Chief Judge of the Third Judicial Circuit Court of Michigan, in the case of Costantino v. City of Detroit, et al, Case No....
archive.org
Click to expand...
Desperate flailing. :palm:
 
archives said:
But his own political party has been busy investigating him for the last year and half, not Democrats, Republicans, House Republicans at that,
Click to expand...

Key words, last year and a half. Another key word, the DOJ investigated for two years and found NOTHING, NADA, ZILCH. What part of NOTHING are you struggling with?

archives said:
doesn’t seem as if everyone thinks Matt is an alter boy
Click to expand...

There you go with the moronic strawmen scarecrow. :palm:
 
Truth Detector said:
Actually, I'm not surprised they dredge this old news up at this time.
Click to expand...


Who is? :dunno:

I've had enough of this so-called "House ethics report" on Matt Gaetz.

The underlying allegations are so flimsy that the DOJ dropped its investigation. The claims hinge on the testimony of two witnesses who have such gaping credibility issues that the investigators and prosecutors knew no jury would ever convict him based on their testimony.

Who are these witnesses?

1) Joel Greenberg has made false sexual allegations against another politician before.

He falsely accused an innocent school teacher who was running against him of having sex with an underaged student. Sound familiar?

A judge said his lies were "downright evil."

2) Greenberg became embroiled in a series of crimes and faced up to 27 years in federal prison.

One of these crimes was having sex with an underage minor, the same 17-year-old who is the central character in the claims against Gaetz.

Greenberg claims he didn't know she was underage because she lied about her age. She is now active on OnlyFans, and has appeared in porn videos. Sound familiar?

According to a 2023 lawsuit, Greenberg repeatedly asked Gaetz to secure a pardon for him, and when Gaetz refused, Greenberg vowed vengeance.

An inmate who shared a cell with Greenberg informed two federal agents that Greenberg told him that the woman “would be willing to lie in hopes of a financial benefit."

Greenberg has admitted to paying the woman's legal bills.

Gaetz has made a habit of picking fights with people in Washington that no one else had the guts to challenge.

They fear him at the corrupt, partisan, Democrat-infested DOJ more than anyone else on Earth except President Trump.
 
Joe said:
Actually I doubt that too but someone will eventually and it won't change the trajectory much.

They fucked with the bull and are getting set to get the horn right up their ass'
Click to expand...
Nah, they’ll vote for him, confirm him, when was the last time the GOP ever refused one of Trump’s demands. All the Susan Collins who are against him before they are for him will follow the same path. Expect a lot of “well, let’s see how he does in the job, we’ll give him a chance” bullshit
 
The Trump Administration said:
Who is? :dunno:

I've had enough of this so-called "House ethics report" on Matt Gaetz.

The underlying allegations are so flimsy that the DOJ dropped its investigation. The claims hinge on the testimony of two witnesses who have such gaping credibility issues that the investigators and prosecutors knew no jury would ever convict him based on their testimony.

Who are these witnesses?

1) Joel Greenberg has made false sexual allegations against another politician before.

He falsely accused an innocent school teacher who was running against him of having sex with an underaged student. Sound familiar?

A judge said his lies were "downright evil."

2) Greenberg became embroiled in a series of crimes and faced up to 27 years in federal prison.

One of these crimes was having sex with an underage minor, the same 17-year-old who is the central character in the claims against Gaetz.

Greenberg claims he didn't know she was underage because she lied about her age. She is now active on OnlyFans, and has appeared in porn videos. Sound familiar?

According to a 2023 lawsuit, Greenberg repeatedly asked Gaetz to secure a pardon for him, and when Gaetz refused, Greenberg vowed vengeance.

An inmate who shared a cell with Greenberg informed two federal agents that Greenberg told him that the woman “would be willing to lie in hopes of a financial benefit."

Greenberg has admitted to paying the woman's legal bills.

Gaetz has made a habit of picking fights with people in Washington that no one else had the guts to challenge.

They fear him at the corrupt, partisan, Democrat-infested DOJ more than anyone else on Earth except President Trump.
Click to expand...
For a second time, it is Gaetz’s own political party who began and have continued for a year and half an investigation into Matty, not the Democrats, not the AG, Matty’s own party, and the House Republicans at that.

Why do you think Trump via Johnson wants the final report squashed? Why did Matty have to quit the House suddenly this week when the report was about to be finalized? Matty is scumbag, fits right in with Trump II

And don’t sweat it, the Committee will not release their report, if they do, only a retracted version for select Senators on the Committee who will announce it isn’t condemning. Matty will be approved, kinda hope he is, should provide a box car full of laughs over the next four years
 
The Trump Administration said:
Who is? :dunno:

I've had enough of this so-called "House ethics report" on Matt Gaetz.

The underlying allegations are so flimsy that the DOJ dropped its investigation. The claims hinge on the testimony of two witnesses who have such gaping credibility issues that the investigators and prosecutors knew no jury would ever convict him based on their testimony.

Who are these witnesses?

1) Joel Greenberg has made false sexual allegations against another politician before.

He falsely accused an innocent school teacher who was running against him of having sex with an underaged student. Sound familiar?

A judge said his lies were "downright evil."

2) Greenberg became embroiled in a series of crimes and faced up to 27 years in federal prison.

One of these crimes was having sex with an underage minor, the same 17-year-old who is the central character in the claims against Gaetz.

Greenberg claims he didn't know she was underage because she lied about her age. She is now active on OnlyFans, and has appeared in porn videos. Sound familiar?

According to a 2023 lawsuit, Greenberg repeatedly asked Gaetz to secure a pardon for him, and when Gaetz refused, Greenberg vowed vengeance.

An inmate who shared a cell with Greenberg informed two federal agents that Greenberg told him that the woman “would be willing to lie in hopes of a financial benefit."

Greenberg has admitted to paying the woman's legal bills.

Gaetz has made a habit of picking fights with people in Washington that no one else had the guts to challenge.

They fear him at the corrupt, partisan, Democrat-infested DOJ more than anyone else on Earth except President Trump.
Click to expand...
The loons on the left don't care about reality or facts. They are stuck in their bubble of ignorance, intolerance and TDS.
 
archives said:
Nah, they’ll vote for him, confirm him, when was the last time the GOP ever refused one of Trump’s demands. All the Susan Collins who are against him before they are for him will follow the same path. Expect a lot of “well, let’s see how he does in the job, we’ll give him a chance” bullshit
Click to expand...
Translation:
dragontan.gif
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top