Ford Testimony

Stretch said:
You didn't hear her say, "It would have been nice if they would have offered to come out to ME?" :palm:
Click to expand...

You didn't hear her answer the question, that she misunderstood the alleged offer and said that she would have been happy to host/entertain/whatever the word was them if they had come out?

You're hammering a bent nail here, dear. Nitpicking, as it were. The whole of her testimony is very credible and she comes across as a believable, sympathetic person who was victimized by your boy scout.

Go read Matt. 7:5 and come back for more.
 
ThatOwlWoman said:
You didn't hear her answer the question, that she misunderstood the alleged offer and said that she would have been happy to host/entertain/whatever the word was them if they had come out?

You're hammering a bent nail here, dear. Nitpicking, as it were. The whole of her testimony is very credible and she comes across as a believable, sympathetic person who was victimized by your boy scout.

Go read Matt. 7:5 and come back for more.
Click to expand...

Yeah...I heard her cover
 
She said that her FRIEND Leland Kaiser was in the room with her. Yet, Kaiser has said she remembers nothing of the kind or even BEING there.

She's also given different accounts of just how many were people in the bedroom.

She asked where the bathroom was when she arrived. And, rarely in those nice homes in Chevy Chase do they only have a bathroom on the 2nd floor. And it's only an en suite bathroom???? Highly doubt that.
 
Last edited:
ThatOwlWoman said:
She does. My son-in-law has the same anxiety, yet at only age 30 he's managed to go to Colorado, Wyoming, and twice to Europe. It makes no difference in the long run. She is there. Her testimony already discredited your RWNJ bullshit about her being unwilling to testify to the committee earlier in the process. Maybe you should try watching the actual testimony instead of lapping up Fox talking points.
Click to expand...
she is the one who said she couldn't fly to DC..she needed time to drive.so what happened?


the rest of your post is meaningless, Feinstein delayed her letter held it back -why would anyone say she should have testified earlier?
Feinstein should have released the letter earlier. it's on Feinstein
 
Just by what I've seen so far, the consensus seems to be that she's credible, at least in terms of the idea that she believes what she's saying. I'm even seeing that from the right (not on JPP, of course).
 
Stretch said:
She said that her FRIEND Leland Kaiser was in the room with her. Yet, Kaiser has said she remembers nothing of the kind or even BEING there.

She's also given different accounts of just how people in the bedroom.

She asked where the bathroom was when she arrived. And, rarely in those nice homes in Chevy Chase do they only have a bathroom on the 2nd floor. And it's only an en suite bathroom???? Highly doubt that.
Click to expand...
when she screws up testimony it's because of stress. but we are supposed to otherwise 100% believe her testimony is not effected by stress.

Man I tell you this woman is conflicted in that she is mousey, then assertive, then crying, then squeaky voice.
She has all the emotional tugs,and people latch onto emotions. as a Buddhist I find that abhorrent, but there you go,
 
Democrats are asking un-serious questions; they are desperately trying to corroborate the claims and impugning the woman doing the real questioning.
 
anatta said:
when she screws up testimony it's because of stress. but we are supposed to otherwise 100% believe her testimony is not effected by stress.

Man I tell you this woman is conflicted in that she is mousey, then assertive, then crying, then squeaky voice.
She has all the emotional tugs,and people latch onto emotions. as a Buddhist I find that abhorrent, but there you go,
Click to expand...

Why don't you find it abhorrent w/ Trump?
 
Thing1 said:
I mean, that sounds like fantasy. You really think she would be doing this - having security around her family all of the time now, moving around, being attacked from all side - to be "worshipped by a gender?"

You're really pretty clueless. I mean, that's borderline deranged to think that.
Click to expand...

in a nation of 300 million people these type of things are emergent properties.

it would be rare to exist in this universe, but on the otherhand only in a universe where existence is possible would one be able to make that observation.

yu might think it's rare for a woman like this to have the motives I have described, but what I described percipitates this outcome.
 
She is seriously messed up. She just said that she did not come forward for political purposes, butttttttttttttttttttt it's about "knowing there are other equally qualified candidates for the S.C. position".

which is a political purpose!!! :palm:

we're not that gullible Christine! unreal.
 
She can't answer questions without looking at her attorneys? Another dishonest Democrat, Spartacus Hooker, saying this is not a court room hearing; yet she has TWO attorney's sitting next her objecting?? :rofl2:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top