Fourth manufactured Democrat hoax unanimousy obliterated by appeals court

[rjhenn]

Say the people who

1) literally welcome illegal immigrants with voter registration forms.

2) commit rampant voter fraud.

GA Secy of State office announces probe of alleged hacking attempt into voter registration

San Francisco Registers 49 Noncitizen Voters—at a Cost of More Than $6,300 Each

Nebraska Democrats 'Welcome' Refugees...With Voter Registration Forms

Maryland county's count suggests noncitizens voting across U.S.

Turns Out, Noncitizens Did Vote In November, Only Question Is How Many?

Trump Is Right — Millions Of Illegals Probably Did Vote In 2016

Study Claims Up To 2.8 Million Non-Citizens Voted In 2008

Orange County vote count suggests fraud

Skid Row voter fraud Prosecutors homeless offered cash cigarettes exchange hundreds

It Sure Looks Like Democrats in Florida Altered Ballots

Democrat-Directed Voter Fraud Uncovered In Florida

Report: Palm Beach Recount Is Missing A ‘Substantial’ Number Of Votes

Democratic Operative Explains Voter Fraud: We've Been Busing People in for 50 years

Arrest Florida election supervisor for voter fraud!

2012 Election: Nearly 200,000 Florida Voters May Not Be Citizens

Voting problems emerge across America

Poll officials allow 'tons' of illegals to vote

The people behind that Texas voter fraud ring have been identified

New Voter Fraud Cases Show Need to Secure Our Elections

Instances of Voter Fraud Continue to Mount, Further Compromising Our Elections

Twelve Employees of Dem-tied Group Charged in Indiana for Voter Registration Fraud

DOJ whistleblower: Obama years were 'Wild West' of voter fraud

23 Voter Fraud Cases from 2016 and Beyond

Kansas Prosecuting Illegal Immigrant For Casting Vote

Hundreds Of Non-Citizens Registered To Vote In Ohio, Investigation Finds

Report: Massive Voter Fraud Uncovered in Nevada

Recount uncovers serious fraud in Detroit


3) just got done implementing ballot harvesting (letting Democrat activists transport ballots to voting places and trusting them not to throw away their opponents' ballots en route...which has already resulted in blatantly stolen elections).

4) colluded with a foreign power to manufacture evidence, lie to a federal judge, illegally spy on and frame their opponent during a major national election.

5) protected the Black Panthers for armed voter intimidation at the polls during Election 2008.

6) had their IRS pleading the 5th under oath to avoid criminal prosecution for rigging Election 2012.

Shall I go on or have your lies been thoroughly corrected enough for you to admit to falsely accusing your opponents of what only the party of ACORN is actually doing yet?

Except when your accusations against him repeatedly prove to be deliberate lies that you're peddling merely to overthrow an election you STILL can't handle losing.



Nothing about stopping your election-stealing treason indicates otherwise.

You are consumed by your TDS. You believe every bit of GOP propaganda, while denying reality. The GOP has been rigging elections through gerrymandering for decades. They've also been making it more difficult for legitimate, but likely Democrat, voters to register to vote. If not for that, it's likely that Trump would have lost the election, just as he lost the popular vote.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

 

[Truth Detector]

Easy left-wing states?
No, pal, those districts were in states that were gerrymandered by Republicans, and even with the gerrymander, you still lost bigly.
If you think the Democrats, and not Trump, solicited foreign election interference, then you're in a cult.

Here's what losing bigly REALLY looks like:

Obama’s legacy in graphical form:

 

[Truth Detector]

Michigan went Trump in 2016, as did a majority of Maine's Electoral votes.

Democrats flipped GOP seats in states like Virginia (3 seats), Kansas (1 seat), Pennsylvania (3 seats), Oklahoma (1 seat), Texas (1 seat), Florida (2 seats), South Carolina (1 seat), Utah (1 seat), and my home state of Georgia, which saw a black woman defeat an incumbent Republican who held Tom Price and Newt Gingrich's old seat in the Atlanta suburbs.

You just shit forth garbage on message boards because you're too lazy to do any of the work necessary to knowing what the fuck you're talking about.

Here's what losing REALLY looks like:

Obama’s legacy in graphical form:

 

[Truth Detector]

If there was no collusion, then why did Paul Manafort -when he was campaign manager for Trump- share polling data, from the states Trump flipped that were targeted by Russian trolls, with Kilmnik?

Mueller Report; Page 173 V I: Ultimately, the investigation did not establish that the Campaign coordinated or conspired with the Russian government in its election-interference activities.

 

[Truth Detector]

Like the fact that Mueller documented multiple meetings between the campaign and Russian agents. What they could not prove was what those meetings were about. Of course, criminals never try to hide what they're doing.

Mueller Report; Page 173 V I: Ultimately, the investigation did not establish that the Campaign coordinated or conspired with the Russian government in its election-interference activities.

 

[Truth Detector]

Completely delusional.

Yes, you are.

 

[LV426]

One election going Republican makes deep blue states like Michigan and Maine "red states?"

If they went red, then that makes them red states, you fucking clod.

 

[LV426]

Yes. This is known as a "midterm election," and they almost ALWAYS significantly shift power to the minority party. Historically speaking, you should have done far better than you did in 2016.

Few things:

1) Why would that be the case if Trump is as wonderful and terrific as you claim and has done such a "marvelous" job with the economy (that hasn't passed 3% annually despite promises of the tax cut it would)?

2) It's conventional for the President's party to lose by 10,000,000 votes in the aggregate? That's the largest aggregate vote margin since Watergate.

3) Democrats should have done better, historically speaking? The only midterm that had a larger aggregate vote margin in anyone's lifetime was 1974, after Watergate.

What's clear is you haven't done the work to be informed here at all. You're just shitting forth bullshit because you are desperate.

 

[rjhenn]

Not a counterpoint. Just pouting and denying established facts.

Imagine that. Get corrected on your garbage logic and immediately retreat to empty posturing and ad hominem fallacies.

Literally WHILE calling everything a secret Russian agent, the nutjob McCarthyite conspiracy theorists of the left hysterically accuse OTHERS of lies and paranoia.

Sure, except for all the illegal wiretaps and individuals sent to infiltrate the campaign in person. Aside from Democrats literally using EVERY FORM of spying to frame Trump, there was absolutely no spying at all.

Based on literally nothing but a DNC disinformation from Russia, which was provably known to be Russian disinformation before the investigation even began, hence it being incessantly (correctly) referred to as "illegal spying to frame their opponents and steal an election."

Shall I break out the crayons or do you think you finally comprehended it this time?

View attachment 14390

You have no "established facts". All you've got is propaganda, disinformation, empty posturing and ad hominems. You are acutely paranoid about the investigation into the Trump campaign's connections to Russia. What I understand is that you are completely divorced from reality, being totally consumed by the disinformation from the GOP.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

 

[LV426]

Someone would benefit from a first-year Poli Sci course.

A class you have never taken in your entire life, and never will.

Because anyone who did take a PolySci class knows that the largest aggregate vote margin before 2018 was in 1974.

What that means is that the incumbent President's party hadn't faced an electoral defeat as bad as the one they faced in 2018 in over 40 years.

 

[LV426]

But you ARE doing all this research and still failing to correctly comprehend the meaning of your own data

You don't seem to understand anything you're saying.

What meaning should I divine from the fact that the aggregate House vote margin in 2018 was 10,000,000, which is the largest since Watergate?

 

[LV426]

Every campaign establishes connections with foreign governments ahead of elections.

Except that Trump said no one in his campaign had any contact with Russia.

So that was a lie, then.

 

[LV426]

Every campaign establishes connections with foreign governments ahead of elections. Trump wasn't able to do that because the entire news media was insisting that Trump had zero chance of winning, exactly as they did with the nomination.

Wait a second, this makes no sense.

Trump wasn't able to establish connections with foreign government ahead of elections? Then what do you say to the fact that he signed a letter of intent in 2016 to build Trump Tower Moscow with the Russian government?

http://cdn.cnn.com/cnn/2018/images/12/18/attachment.1.pdf

Ouch. How inconvenient for your argument.

 

[LV426]

So providing non-rigged polling data to foreign governments became necessary to carry out normal transition team business. :

What does polling data have to do with transition team business? Nothing. The transition wouldn't happen until after the election, not before it while the polls are being run.

So how does polling data from states targeted by Russian trolls carry out the transition that happens after the election?

 

[LV426]

So providing non-rigged polling data to foreign governments became necessary to carry out normal transition team business.

This makes absolutely no sense because pre-election polls have nothing to do with a transition that happens after an election.

Why do I get the sense you're just typing random thoughts in mass volume in the hopes you frustrate the conversation?

 

[LV426]

So providing non-rigged polling data to foreign governments became necessary to carry out normal transition team business. Democrats being dishonest gutter trash sleazebags directly CAUSED this to happen...to which Democrats, being dishonest gutter trash sleazebags, responded by pretending that it somehow legitimized their debunked frame job against Trump.

So Democrats caused Manafort to share polling data with Kilmnik before the election because otherwise Manafort wouldn't have done that?

Nothing you are saying makes any sense, but you seem to think that being a dick about it does.

 

[dukkha]

So Democrats caused Manafort to share polling data with Kilmnik before the election because otherwise Manafort wouldn't have done that?

Nothing you are saying makes any sense, but you seem to think that being a dick about it does.

ROFL are you still on that?? Gates is the one that said he was a spy tio Mueller -can you figure out why?
Because Gates was "coopertating" with Mueller to save his own skin!


and what did Manafort give him? nothing of value because there was NO RUSSIAN COLLUSION.
Of course being a bat chit crazed partisan I don't expect you to learn this
https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...9221ce-62bc-11e9-9ff2-abc984dc9eec_story.html

Kilimnik said the 448-page report by Robert S. Mueller III paints a false picture of his role, including the assessment by the FBI that he has ties to Russian intelligence.

“I have no ties to Russian or, for that matter, any intelligence operation,” he wrote in an email. “This is one of the biggest mistakes in the public perception and in the report. It is simply not based on any facts and is a made-up narrative.”

More broadly, Kilimnik said, “I absolutely have zero to do with the Russia interference in the U.S. elections investigated by Mr. Mueller.”

The report focused on his Kilimnik’s connections to Russian and Ukrainian business tycoons and his relationship with Manafort, who served as Trump’s campaign chairman until August 2016, when he resigned.

Mueller’s report paints a portrait of a campaign intrigued by Russian overtures

The two men spoke extensively during the presidential race. Manafort briefed Kilimnik on the campaign during an in-person meeting in spring 2016 in New York, according to prosecutors.
That August, during a meeting at a New York City cigar bar, Kilimnik gave Manafort a proposal from former Ukrainian president Viktor Yanukovych that would have guaranteed Russian control over a new autonomous region in eastern Ukraine, according to Mueller. They also discussed Manafort’s strategy for winning Democratic votes in Midwestern states.
~~

why shouldn't Kilimnik pass on the Yanukovych initiative? Discussing a strategy would be normal for
2 old political consultants,but YOU MAKE IT SEEM SINISTER WITH RUSSIAN COLLUSION nonsense

Get over it!! NO COLLUSION!!

 

[LV426]

Try doing your homework sometime. You just shit forth garbage on message boards because you're too lazy to do any of the work necessary to knowing what the fuck you're talking about.

Look man...there are a lot of things I tolerate from Conservatives on these boards. One of the things I don't is when the Conservative lack of imagination is so apparent, the best you can do is plagiarize what I post and spit it back to me because you're incapable of coming up with original responses of your own.

You're just a hack.

 

[LV426]

ROFL are you still on that?? Gates is the one that said he was a spy tio Mueller -can you figure out why?

Gates wasn't a spy, he became a cooperating witness because he got caught breaking the law.

 

[LV426]

Because Gates was "coopertating" with Mueller to save his own skin!

Yeah, why would he want to take the fall for his boss or his boss' boss?