FOX News reports: Jobless claims fall to lowest in four and a half years

  • Thread starter Thread starter Guns Guns Guns
  • Start date Start date
it always cracks me up when liberals who hate fox news and call it faux news....always use fox when it supports their agenda

LOL
 
unfortunately, this is not really that great of news. it is seasonal, so it will be adjusted and it is only reflects "new" claims, not existing claims or those who have dropped out.
 
Even better, California simply didn't report all of their numbers. The report is yet again invaluable in only the fact that we can't use it to find out the actual numbers...
 
Even better, California simply didn't report all of their numbers. The report is yet again invaluable in only the fact that we can't use it to find out the actual numbers...

But when it showed higher rates the data was unquestionable?
 
The numbers are great if you don't count the largest state with some of the worst unemployment. Sure, leave Commiefornistan out of the numbers. How dare anyone question the validity of the numbers. The Dear Leader has an election to win. They can report them right in December ;)
 
But when it showed higher rates the data was unquestionable?

Not particularly, it is why we draw attention to the U-6 numbers. The idea that we should stop counting people that give up on looking is silly. Both sides do it, but it isn't even close to accurate. They do adjust for seasonal averages, this is a decent thing. However, when all the sudden "mistakes" come just before an election it makes people distrust it more.
 
Not particularly, it is why we draw attention to the U-6 numbers. The idea that we should stop counting people that give up on looking is silly. Both sides do it, but it isn't even close to accurate. They do adjust for seasonal averages, this is a decent thing. However, when all the sudden "mistakes" come just before an election it makes people distrust it more.

So you can link up to some posts of yours that show skepticism of statistics that favor Republicans?
 
So you can link up to some posts of yours that show skepticism of statistics that favor Republicans?

In what time frame? During Bush's terms I was almost always on about the fact that the jobs that were created during his tenure sucked, while I did say it was "full employment"... But then I disliked Bush very much. He did not, however, seem to have the BLS on his side just as elections were coming up, it wasn't nearly the issue it seems to have become at this time (or should I say "just in time".)
 
In what time frame? During Bush's terms I was almost always on about the fact that the jobs that were created during his tenure sucked, while I did say it was "full employment"... But then I disliked Bush very much. He did not, however, seem to have the BLS on his side just as elections were coming up, it wasn't nearly the issue it seems to have become at this time (or should I say "just in time".)


So you can't.
 
Back
Top