I thought Kamala Harris "won" in her debate with Trump. When I saw trumpers questioning that, my feelings were that they simply could not tolerate acknowledging the win. I saw no reason to explain what I meant by "debate" or "win" when I posted that thought...and I feel that same way about my post regarding this "debate."What constitutes a winner in your mind, Frank?
Is the quality of the presentation more important than the content?
I think that it may be
since these "debates" are TV entertainment more than anything else.
The majority of viewers wouldn't sit through an actual, serious debate conducted under real debate protocols.
Decency and respect, though?
Perhaps I have a divergent view.
Decency, to me, is in the content of the ideology.
I'd have a hard time respecting anybody who truly respects the likes of Vance.
That's me, of course.
I'm a side-taker by genetic inclination.
You are doing what the trumpers did after the debate between Trump and Kamala Harris...where she clearly kicked Trump's ass.When you repeatedly get caught in provable lies that is not a win dude
Not sure of what you are saying here, Martin.Always helpful to have the final word on things.
It was more a suggestion. None of us is the judge. You can argue, as I would, that if what you want in a vice president is someone with a record of good government running on a progressive platform who had a very human case of the nerves, you might tag him the winner, and if you want someone with no record of much of anything who has made a name for himself putting down entire groups of people, from "cat ladies" to "Democrats (who) are anti-family" to "progressives (who) are reprehensible", to the neighbors you grew up with in Appalachia, you might pickNot sure of what you are saying here, Martin.
What's your point?Almost all the importation of slaves ended in 1808. That means the neighborhoods with the Americans who have been here the longest are the Black neighborhoods, with the obvious exception of reservations.
"I want to fuck with your brain" is always Walts point.What's your point?
He needs to get a hobby...."I want to fuck with your brain" is always Walts point.
At least we are not as dumb as this useless fuck.He needs to get a hobby....
And we're here for the right reason...At least we are not as dumb as this useless fuck.
We did not faIl at life as so many did.And we're here for the right reason...
You certainly have no obligation to explain, Frank.I thought Kamala Harris "won" in her debate with Trump. When I saw trumpers questioning that, my feelings were that they simply could not tolerate acknowledging the win. I saw no reason to explain what I meant by "debate" or "win" when I posted that thought...and I feel that same way about my post regarding this "debate."
Blacks have a better claim to be "real Americans" than most whites.What's your point?
Where did that come from?? Desh said Russia was my motherland and I replied that I had been here in America longer than her. And that's what you came up with?Blacks have a better claim to be "real Americans" than most whites.
Vance didn’t win that debateYou are doing what the trumpers did after the debate between Trump and Kamala Harris...where she clearly kicked Trump's ass.
If you want to do that kind of thing...fine with me.
How old are you?Where did that come from?? Desh said Russia was my motherland and I replied that I had been here in America longer than her. And that's what you came up with?
I hope you know how to tell which people are lying hereThis sounds amazing as I found it
very much useful and informative to be honest. Also, I have gone through this
post which definitely helped me out a lot as a new member I am looking forward
for more such discussions.
What’s wrong with your brainWalz did not win last night's debate. Overall, Vance did...although there were some winner moments for Walz.
They both showed me that a debate like this can be held with a reasonable amount of decency and respect.
I thank them both for that.