Fraud proof voting process?

China Joe said:
And your point?
Click to expand...

Try to keep up.

"the people selected to be voters in the electoral college, should reflect the popular vote of their state".

You responded, "they do".

The unanimous decision comes after “faithless electors” in Washington and Colorado voted contrary to who they originally promised to support.
 
no worries said:
Try to keep up.

"the people selected to be voters in the electoral college, should reflect the popular vote of their state".

You responded, "they do".

The unanimous decision comes after “faithless electors” in Washington and Colorado voted contrary to who they originally promised to support.
Click to expand...

That's because they know that there was fraud and the vote should not have been certified.
 
China Joe said:
That's because they know that there was fraud and the vote should not have been certified.
Click to expand...

Absolutely not true. But as usual, the righty answer is to slash voters. Since Weyrich in 1980 the Repubs put their faith in voter suppression. You guys are suggesting suppression on steroids.
 
China Joe said:
We all know that there are dozens if not hundreds of countries where fraud occurs routinely. There are also hundreds of state-side examples where voter totals are higher than the voting population. For you to insist that it doesn't happen here points to naivety.
Click to expand...

It isn't naivety. It is willful ignorance. The only time the Left gets their panties in a twist about voter fraud is when it isn't them perpetrating it. You see it on this very board. Some Republican gets caught doing voter fraud and it's a four-alarm head on fire, screaming frenzy of hate about how voter fraud is horrible. A Democrat gets caught (and that's far more prevalent) and the same people shrug and tell you it made no difference and was an isolated case.

Voter fraud happens. It's mostly Democrats doing it. That's how it is. Does it make a difference? Rarely.

Just remember-- They can't cheat if it isn't close.

Now all that said, electronic voting should be banned along with mail in voting. I have no problem mailing ballots to registered voters, but they have to turn them in in person to have them counted. Exceptions can be made for those truly unable to do this in person.
After all, if voting is so important as the same people who call for all mail-in balloting claim, then it isn't too much to ask for an ID and for you to turn your marked ballot in in person. That's a small inconvenience at most.
 
Nordberg said:
Absolutely not true. But as usual, the righty answer is to slash voters. Since Weyrich in 1980 the Repubs put their faith in voter suppression. You guys are suggesting suppression on steroids.
Click to expand...

Absolutely not true. But as usual, the lefty answer is to accuse righties of wanting to slash voters.
 
BidenPresident said:
Voting fraud is extremely rare and inconsequential. The real problem is Trump, who still can be prosecuted by Georgia.
Click to expand...

What amount of voting fraud are you fuck sticks comfortable with? I love how you idiots tacitly agree their is fraud but try and claim it's not "widespread" and now "inconsequential". What fucking morons you people are.
 
no worries said:
65,853,625 votes for Hillary.

62,985,106 votes for the orange fraud.
Click to expand...

That's not proof of fraud it's proof the talking pig in a pant suit couldn't get the right people to vote for her. The American people don't want only California and New York deciding who the president will be.
 
Yakuda said:
That's not proof of fraud it's proof the talking pig in a pant suit couldn't get the right people to vote for her. The American people don't want only California and New York deciding who the president will be.
Click to expand...

Of course Hillary needed the right 300 people to vote for her instead of 3 million.

Electoral college system needs to be abolished.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top