This not a SC level case. The law is clear.
Fraud.
- Thread starter coldjoint
- Start date
This not a SC level case. The law is clear.
Prove it.
All that and you said nothing. Next.
What else would they be?
LurchAddams
There Can be Only One!
I said it all! I knew I could get you and your sock to blow if I just calmly picked away at your lunacy. You guys always do. It much be so frustrating for you you can't fool anyone not as stupid as you.
What are you talking about? Your delusions of grandeur could mean serious trouble. Better get checked out.
LurchAddams
There Can be Only One!
Oh, no! Please! I do not think I'm a genius. One doesn't have to be to figure you out. You're really, really stupid.
Rasmussen Reports
@Rasmussen_Poll
Update: New - 48% of Maricopa election centers had printer or tabulator malfunctions on election day, not the previously estimated 20%. And no such widespread issues were reported during the early voting period that preceded election day and used the very same equipment. Wow.
Quote Tweet
Rasmussen Reports
@Rasmussen_Poll
·
@Rasmussen_Poll
Update: New - 48% of Maricopa election centers had printer or tabulator malfunctions on election day, not the previously estimated 20%. And no such widespread issues were reported during the early voting period that preceded election day and used the very same equipment. Wow.
Quote Tweet
Rasmussen Reports
@Rasmussen_Poll
·
I did not say that. i said you think way to highly of yourself when I cannot see one reason why you should. I hope you can understand that.
LurchAddams
There Can be Only One!
Well, your opinion will be given its proper due, I assure you!
I know someone as conceited as you needs the final word. Go right ahead.
LurchAddams
There Can be Only One!
Thanks! Don't mind if I do. Like all MAGAs, you thought you were going to "own the libs", but, as usual, you ended up getting owned.
You MAGAs will never learn.
Truck Fump / h1b
Verified User
is it hate speech to say the election was fraudulent?
but they didn't go around arresting people who said the outcome was wrong.
They did arrest people that threatened violence.
Why did you cite Bush v Gore as your evidence that the law required them to hold the election again? It seems your head is so far up your ass you don't even know what Bush v Gore said.
Truck Fump / h1b
Verified User
like who?
It is untrue and calls a fair and honest election into a black hole of lies. It ignites more hate and anger and in the end, contributes to the end of the American experiment. You should be proud of that.
Truck Fump / h1b
Verified User
you cannot prove there was no fraud.
that's just your opinion.
free speech should prevail. that's the american way, in actuality.
you're a borgian cycloptic imbecile.
signalmankenneth
Verified User
Nope. Merely delusionally stupid speech.