From The Nation Trumps attack on media

Many papers have supported Republian candidiates before. This guy is different. He was totally unqualified, unfit, ill suited and mentally deranged pussy grabbing
casino money, NY real estate (mobbed up) , multiple bankrupct TV clown. You aren't doing your job as a newspaper if you give a piece of shit like this a thumbs up.

Rubio, Bush, Kasich and Cruz probably were endorsed or certainly would have been.

Trump is a special case of unqualified and you know it.

Yeah, but he scored big on the tax bill lol.

Will The Resistance resist on Trump’s infrastructure agenda too?
 
Sourced details? Would those be the Never Trumpers or those that automatically hate him because he beat their bitch Hillary?

Wall Street Journal Editor Says His Newspaper Won't Call Donald Trump's Lies 'Lies'

Wall Street Journal Editor-in-Chief Gerard Baker said his newspaper would not refer to false statements from the Trump administration as “lies,” because doing so would ascribe a “moral intent” to the statements.

Baker appeared on NBC’s “Meet The Press” Sunday, where he described some of President-elect Donald Trump’s falsehoods as “questionable” and “challengeable.” But, he said, “I’d be careful about using the word ‘lie’ ...

He said reporters should state the facts, but leave classifying them to readers, citing the example of Trump’s claim that thousands of Muslims in New Jersey were celebrating on 9/11.

“I think it’s then up to the reader to make up their own mind to say, ‘This is what Donald Trump says. This is what a reliable, trustworthy news organization reports. And you know what? I don’t think that’s true.’”

http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/ent...lies-donald-trump_us_586934b8e4b0eb586489df43

That's what the media should be doing, eh?
 
Wall Street Journal Editor Says His Newspaper Won't Call Donald Trump's Lies 'Lies'

Wall Street Journal Editor-in-Chief Gerard Baker said his newspaper would not refer to false statements from the Trump administration as “lies,” because doing so would ascribe a “moral intent” to the statements.

Baker appeared on NBC’s “Meet The Press” Sunday, where he described some of President-elect Donald Trump’s falsehoods as “questionable” and “challengeable.” But, he said, “I’d be careful about using the word ‘lie’ ...

He said reporters should state the facts, but leave classifying them to readers, citing the example of Trump’s claim that thousands of Muslims in New Jersey were celebrating on 9/11.

“I think it’s then up to the reader to make up their own mind to say, ‘This is what Donald Trump says. This is what a reliable, trustworthy news organization reports. And you know what? I don’t think that’s true.’”

http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/ent...lies-donald-trump_us_586934b8e4b0eb586489df43

That's what the media should be doing, eh?

A simple "yes" to my second question would have been sufficient.

The media that is doing what you say should be doing failed to do it with the black President. Maybe they were afraid they'd be called racists or perhaps they were fighting to see which one could stick their nose up his ass first.
 
I occasionally attempt to stomach a few minutes of The 700 Club on one of the local indie stations right after our local morning news ends.

A few minutes of Pat Robertson's doddering drool is about all I can take before the bile begins to rise and I have to change the channel to avoid upchucking my breakfast. Happened to take in a couple of minutes just this morning. Thankfully, it was one Pat's frequent days off, but nonetheless, I had to change the channel after a few minutes of their other anchors began gleefully spouting off about how and all the reasons why the pervert scumbag Dumpster Donnie is so wildly popular amongst evangelicals, cementing my view of evangelicals as a bunch of phony baloney droolers who haven't got the slightest notion of what Jesus is supposed to represent.

Strange thing is that's how I felt when Obama got on TV and started running his dick sucker.

You damn sure don't represent what Jesus taught.
 
What Trump is doing is nothing new in world history.

For centuries, despots & tyrants have prioritized undermining and ultimately eliminating a free press.

He's not trying to eliminate the press. He wants them to stop lying about him.
 
What Trump is doing is nothing new in world history.

For centuries, despots & tyrants have prioritized undermining and ultimately eliminating a free press.

I laugh at the notion of a free press anyway. The "free press" allows one side to lie at will. The best example is their deceit in touting the Clinton Surplus. It was an outright lie, but the left wing dominated media still talks about it.
 
I laugh at the notion of a free press anyway. The "free press" allows one side to lie at will. The best example is their deceit in touting the Clinton Surplus. It was an outright lie, but the left wing dominated media still talks about it.

Did the press ever portray that as being related to our debt?
 
Did the press ever portray that as being related to our debt?

strange question as a budget surplus would obviously be an agent of change on our debt

why does Fox News blow away the other stations in ratings? Is it better, is there more conservatives? Or is it that in a supposedly free society, conservative view points are drastically undeserved leaving one alternative to win the ratings war.

The same went with newspapers during the election. Not a single one endorsed Trump. Not one! Late night talk shows. early morning talk shows, all the same. Very biased and one sided.

To claim these institutions are free and open is just asinine. They definitely serve as the voice of the opposition party.
 
why does Fox News blow away the other stations in ratings? Is it better, is there more conservatives? Or is it that in a supposedly free society, conservative view points are drastically undeserved leaving one alternative to win the ratings war.

The same went with newspapers during the election. Not a single one endorsed Trump. Not one! Late night talk shows. early morning talk shows, all the same. Very biased and one sided.

To claim these institutions are free and open is just asinine. They definitely serve as the voice of the opposition party.

You didn't answer my question.

To your general point, media bias is unfortunate. But most of the bias is reserved for opinion pages and shows. Late night talk shows in particular are not really something people should look to for hard news.

Most journalism is still the result of hard work and a commitment to the truth. What Trump is doing to the media right now is shameful & should concern all Americans.
 
he was still supported by about half the voting population. Yet newspapers, which should function as a voice for the community it serves, universally went another direction.

ps Liary Rotten was by far the most un-deserving candidate in my lifetime, and you damn well know it

you just fucking lying about people is not proof of your claims asshole


quit licking rat balls and lying and provide some proof of your idiot claims


Fox news has been caught in lie after lie

yet your fucking lame ass just keeps begging for more lies because you cant fucking think straight


Hilary was completely quailified and Dumpster Donny was and is not


fuck you very much
 
because ultimately they serve the community and our the voice for the community at large.

If they universally work in opposition of what the community wants, they become propoganda

dear fucking idiot

your shit cheated himself into office


that is why the reflection you see was not there
 
A simple "yes" to my second question would have been sufficient.

Your two questions were: "Sourced details? Would those be the Never Trumpers or those that automatically hate him because he beat their bitch Hillary?"

Never Trumpers and those that automatically hate him etc. are PEOPLE. Sourced details are FACTS. The answer to your second question is therefore: No.
 
you just fucking lying about people is not proof of your claims asshole


quit licking rat balls and lying and provide some proof of your idiot claims


Fox news has been caught in lie after lie

yet your fucking lame ass just keeps begging for more lies because you cant fucking think straight


Hilary was completely quailified and Dumpster Donny was and is not


fuck you very much
you have serious issues.


ignore on
 
Your two questions were: "Sourced details? Would those be the Never Trumpers or those that automatically hate him because he beat their bitch Hillary?"

Never Trumpers and those that automatically hate him etc. are PEOPLE. Sourced details are FACTS. The answer to your second question is therefore: No.

Depends on the source.
That wasn't the answer you indicated in your rant.
 
Endorsements aren't supposed to be a reflection of the community.

It depends. If the endorsement comes from someone in the community the community has chosen to represent them (i.e. - elected official), it is a reflection of the community.
 
Back
Top