Sentence by sentence response:
1. Translation: Port Tack was wrong, but doesn't have the intellectual maturity/honesty to admit it.
2. Port Tack inadvertently makes my case: you force people off their homelands WERE THEY HAD EASY ACCESS TO WATER, put them in area that is walled off, and YOU CONTROL THE WATER IN THAT REGION as it is NOT NATURALLY FREELY ACCESSIBLE. That makes Israel the bad guys here, and knee jerk pro-zionist like Port Tack willfully/genuinely ignorant parrots.
3. Port Tack again displays the revisionist mindset of a pro-zionist flunky. NETANYAHU'S ISRAEL DOES NOT RECOGNIZE THE PALESTINIAN STATE, that is why they have created the apartheid situation in the region. Further more, as history shows, prior to the declaration of Israel as an independent country, you had jews, palestinians, christians moslems and arabs living in that region for generations. Matters of history, matters of fact.
4. Answer. The Egyptians didn't drive the Palestinians off their land and corral them into a ghetto.
5. Egypt cannot absorb the entire Palestinian population....period. Not logistically, and not culturally/religiously without major problems. Hell, America bitches about "illegals" while selectively admitting foreigners to set up shop here under the guise of "visa's" and the like. Also, anyone who comes from Cuba gets automatic admittance, processing and eventual citizenship. However, folk fleeing the Duvalier regime from Haiti didn't fare the same.
6. See #1 - 4. Any rational, objective adult who is more up on the history of the region discuss will easily see the major flaws in Port Tack's blathering.
Since Port Tack is unwilling or incapable of acknowledging or conceding his error, there is no point in trying to have further discussion with him. I leave him to the last predictable retorts.