George Will leaving Republican Party

PostmodernProphet said:
because that's what Republicans should do if they want to win elections, right?.......fucking idiot......
Click to expand...

Please tell me where I'm wrong here. There are maybe 20 people who post on this board regularly and many of us have been here for years. The chances are about zero and none that anyone is changing their votes based on what is posted here. And contrary to what Desh believes no one on the outside reads this board so no other opinions are being influenced.

So within those confines that nothing said here is having any influence on the election yes I can be honest about Trump.
 
Right said:
By all means, cite.
Click to expand...

The article I probably had in mind is from Town Hall, rather than National Review:

http://townhall.com/columnists/dere...d-trumps-biggest-opponent-is-himself-n2175508

That said, David French did call-out Trumptards with this quote:

David French said:
Men and women who decried identity politics knowingly and gleefully stoked online mobs of white supremacists to threaten and intimidate Trump’s critics.
Click to expand...

http://www.nationalreview.com/artic...rters-conservatives-scorned-them-wait-rebuild
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
The "bogus parameters" seem to be coming from the liberal side of the political fence; because they keep saying he's a racist and when challenged to show proof, they either fold or lie.

Link me to a statement he made, that was racist or just accept the fact that this is just another liberal red herring.
Click to expand...

See my Town Hall article above.

I'm just curious how Trump saying that Curiel can't be impartial because "he's Mexican" is anything but "the textbook definition of racism," as Paul Ryan put it. Keep in mind, that simply denying the truth doesn't make reality change or stretch. I also reject the notion that you are accidentally wrong - you are obviously lying, because this is too obvious. Now you can go ahead and respond, "but how is that racist?"
 
Establishment said:
See my Town Hall article above.

I'm just curious how Trump saying that Curiel can't be impartial because "he's Mexican" is anything but "the textbook definition of racism," as Paul Ryan put it. Keep in mind, that simply denying the truth doesn't make reality change or stretch. I also reject the notion that you are accidentally wrong - you are obviously lying, because this is too obvious. Now you can go ahead and respond, "but how is that racist?"
Click to expand...

No, I'm not lying; but it is you doesn't have a clue.

Once again, for your edification, what has Trump said that shows he's a racist?
 
Establishment said:
And as I have already provided you with the evidence, you need to stop lying.
Click to expand...

What's wrong, can't you bring yourself to say way and instead need to rely on links??
Give me a link to what he said, that was racist.
It shouldn't be that hard, seeing as how everything he's said is being quoted.
 
cawacko said:
Please tell me where I'm wrong here.
Click to expand...

you aren't....now that you're no longer a Republican......if you were still a Republican I might point out its not a very good campaign tactic to criticize your party's nominee......but since you have left the party I have no grounds to complain about your actions.....
 
Establishment said:
Isn't that what we did nominating Douchebag Donald?
Click to expand...

nope......its what you've done AFTER we nominated Trump instead of another Romney or McCain or whoever the majority of Republican voters didn't want as the nominee......for some reason you've decided that since most Republicans didn't agree with you the best choice of action is to destroy the Republican party......may I suggest you simply kill yourself instead......it leaves less of a mess for the rest of us and all we will have lost is another liberal......
 
PostmodernProphet said:
nope......its what you've done AFTER we nominated Trump instead of another Romney or McCain or whoever the majority of Republican voters didn't want as the nominee......for some reason you've decided that since most Republicans didn't agree with you the best choice of action is to destroy the Republican party......may I suggest you simply kill yourself instead......it leaves less of a mess for the rest of us and all we will have lost is another liberal......
Click to expand...

what establishment and cawacko dont get is their brand of "republican" has led the party to loss after loss.
 
tsuke said:
what establishment and cawacko dont get is their brand of "republican" has led the party to loss after loss.
Click to expand...

And your brand of Democrat is about to get their *ss kicked by Hillary Clinton. That's about as low as you can go.
 
cawacko said:
And your brand of Democrat is about to get their *ss kicked by Hillary Clinton. That's about as low as you can go.
Click to expand...

lol. It is our first time really in charge and our side got Brexit already while you traditional "conservatives" did everything they could to stop it under cameron.

Illegal Immigration is now a national debate instead of being covertly supportly supported by both sides. Your most "conservative" member of senate cruz was giving illegals soccer balls and teddy bears:/

Lastly getting other countries to pay thier share and getting out of stupid globalized trade deals (or at least renegotiating them) is being discussed.

We have accomplished a lot this year. Not to mention a hostile takeover of the GOP.
 
Establishment said:
See my Town Hall article above.

I'm just curious how Trump saying that Curiel can't be impartial because "he's Mexican" is anything but "the textbook definition of racism," as Paul Ryan put it. Keep in mind, that simply denying the truth doesn't make reality change or stretch. I also reject the notion that you are accidentally wrong - you are obviously lying, because this is too obvious. Now you can go ahead and respond, "but how is that racist?"
Click to expand...

Text book racist?
rac·ism
ˈrāˌsizəm/
noun

  • the belief that all members of each race possess characteristics or abilities specific to that race, especially so as to distinguish it as inferior or superior to another race or races.

Trump wants to:
1. Prevent refugee resettlement to the US until we can establish a better system for vetting. (That's not racist)
2. Build a wall to stem the flow of illegal immigration, drug & human trafficking, and gun running. (That's not racist)

Trump thinks that:
1. A judge associated with helping illegal Hispanics, who is also hearing a suit against him might be racist against him. (That's not racist) paranoid, yes, racist no.

none of the above is text book racist.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top