George Will leaving Republican Party

J Craft said:
Text book racist?
rac·ism
ˈrāˌsizəm/
noun

  • the belief that all members of each race possess characteristics or abilities specific to that race, especially so as to distinguish it as inferior or superior to another race or races.

Trump wants to:
1. Prevent refugee resettlement to the US until we can establish a better system for vetting. (That's not racist)
2. Build a wall to stem the flow of illegal immigration, drug & human trafficking, and gun running. (That's not racist)

Trump thinks that:
1. A judge associated with helping illegal Hispanics, who is also hearing a suit against him might be racist against him. (That's not racist) paranoid, yes, racist no.

none of the above is text book racist.
Click to expand...

That's not what Trump said about Curiel. When he had the opportunity to clarify his remarks and offer spin, he continued to emphasize that his problems with the judge were specific to him being Mexican.
 
J Craft said:
The American people are going to suffer due to those who vote for Hillary, and those who don't vote for Trump.
Click to expand...

The American people have two incredibly horrible choices for President and will suffer either way. There's a reason they have the two highest negative ratings of any recent candidates.
 
On a whole, with the Court being the decisive factor that can rule on issues, issues that will have long term impacts , the country suffers more under Hillary.
 
It's not racist. It's dumb logic at worst.

The use of the term so misapplied has rendered it nothing but a club to try and shut people up.
 
cawacko said:
As a Republican I cannot support a Democrat. Trump gave an economic speech yesterday quoting Bernie Sanders and EPI which is the AFL-CIO's think tank. Trump putting a R next to his name doesn't change who he is. He's a Democrat. It's really no different than Michael Bloomberg becoming a Republican to run for Mayor of NYC. The man was never a Republican.
Click to expand...

For the first time in american history, a presidential candidate is running for the office of president primarily and exclusively for the benefit of the middle class. This has never happened before. And you're deliberately missing the train because you are engrossed with social justice and equality and all things equal because you cannot see anything else besides white faces among the workers of the middle class.

Even Reagan never ran exclusively for this economic engine that is driving our liberty which is being compromised and destroyed by political party special interests and corporate globalism.

Donald Trump is fighting for us and he will continue fighting for us exclusively when he reaches the white house, not special interests or global conglomerates that make up the elite establishment, which is the whole problem here with Trump for you never Trumpers.
 
J Craft said:
On a whole, with the Court being the decisive factor that can rule on issues, issues that will have long term impacts , the country suffers more under Hillary.
Click to expand...

If that's the big issue we should selected a candidate that could beat Hillary. We had several of them. The biggest issue is immigration so we nominated a guy with a very low chance of winning. We'll lose the court as a result
 
cawacko said:
If that's the big issue we should selected a candidate that could beat Hillary. We had several of them. The biggest issue is immigration so we nominated a guy with a very low chance of winning. We'll lose the court as a result
Click to expand...

He's the candidate. The only candidate that could possibly win at this stageis. yes, it's Trump, but we have the "anyone but Trump" weight cry babies that will help elect Hellary.
 
J Craft said:
He's the candidate. The only candidate that could possibly win at this stageis. yes, it's Trump, but we have the "anyone but Trump" weight cry babies that will help elect Hellary.
Click to expand...

The convention has yet to occur. There's still hope for a miracle. Maybe Trump will announce he really is a Democrat and this was all a giant troll and we can put someone in his place who will win.

And this is just me but there are a lot of principled conservatives who can't support Trump and I wouldn't refer to them as cry babies.
 
cawacko said:
If that's the big issue we should selected a candidate that could beat Hillary. We had several of them. The biggest issue is immigration so we nominated a guy with a very low chance of winning. We'll lose the court as a result
Click to expand...

here's a thought......if you and George Will and the other ten percent of the GOP who refuse to consider voting for him would stop whining and campaign for him, he would be ahead of Hillary......
 
PostmodernProphet said:
here's a thought......if you and George Will and the other ten percent of the GOP who refuse to consider voting for him would stop whining and campaign for him, he would be ahead of Hillary......
Click to expand...

You don't know California and the Bay Area real well then if you think telling people to vote for Trump just because he's a Republican will have any positive effect.
 
cawacko said:
You don't know California and the Bay Area real well then if you think telling people to vote for Trump just because he's a Republican will have any positive effect.
Click to expand...

if all the people who were NeverTrumpers lived in California it wouldn't matter anyway......but they don't.....and flapping your lips about it helps no one but Hillary......likely the very result you're hoping for......
 
J Craft said:
He's the candidate. The only candidate that could possibly win at this stageis. yes, it's Trump, but we have the "anyone but Trump" weight cry babies that will help elect Hellary.
Click to expand...

As of now it looks like she doesn't really need any help, but will gladly take it..
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top