George Zimmerman Fled Angry Mob in Miami

USFREEDOM911 said:
But the world doesn't hate him.
Those that do are just whiny little pussy's. ;)
Click to expand...

Well Zimmerman is a walking pussy. We saw that when Trayvon whipped his ass in hand to hand combat. If Zimmerman doesn't know how to fight on the ground he needs to take up jiu-jitsu
 
Sun Devil said:
Well Zimmerman is a walking pussy. We saw that when Trayvon whipped his ass in hand to hand combat. If Zimmerman doesn't know how to fight on the ground he needs to take up jiu-jitsu
Click to expand...

You seem to have forgotten that it was you who stated that there are no rules in a street fight; but now you want to whine that Trayvon learned that he wasn't truly bullet proof.
Are you going to make the trip to Sanford Florida, in five days (02/26) and put flowers on his head stone?
 
Sun Devil said:
Zimmerman is a fucking idiot. His life is over and he is gambling with his families lives. Only reason Zimmerman isn't dead is because $10k is not enough
Click to expand...
I would never advocate the killing of another human being. I accept the factual basis of the jury's verdict that aquited him. I'll take the higher road.

Having said that, I do take some small measure of satisfaction that this inept coward has become a social pariah. :)
 
Abraxas said:
I bet that you thought OJ was innocent.
Click to expand...
Don't know...Our courts don't decide innocence. Just guilty or not guilty.

I was working from my home when that trial occurred. There is absolutely no doubt that the Jury made the correct decision in the OJ murder trial. The reasonable doubt hole was so big Super Stupid could have driven his ego through it.
 
christiefan915 said:
This is a perfect example of what I was talking about the other day on the thread about GZ going to law school. GZ said he's broke, homeless and has PTSD. I said he has a history of making bad choices and seems unable to understand why. He's whining about an angry mob?

Well George, how about keeping your head down? Find a job, any job, and stay out of the limelight. Let the memory of what you did fade from people's minds. If you're really the good guy you want us to believe you are, start showing it by your actions and quit looking for publicity. Americans have famously short memories and a great ability to rewrite the past, that's the first lesson you should learn.
Click to expand...
Man Christie! I should have hired you when I had that public relations problem after that live stock incident in Arkansas!!!
 
Jarod said:
He also accidently got involved in negotiating a celebrity fight contract that fell apart.

I would not be surprised to see him on Dancing with the Stars next season.
Click to expand...
If he doesn't learn to keep his mouth shut and to stop stalking kids armed with skittles he may end up as a guest star on "Dr G. Medical Examiner."
 
Abraxas said:
It has to do with the fact that there is a huge racial element to all this as there was in the OJ trial. I also think that many that considered OJ innocent are now baying for Zimmerman's blood.
Click to expand...
Funny.....I believed the verdict in both cases were correct. Reasonable doubt existed. There is also a significant difference between the OJ case. We know for a fact that Mr. Zimmerman killed Mr. Martin. Where as the facts of the case in the OJ case indicate strongly of either gross incompetence by investigators or an attempt to frame a defendant or both. Due to that, we don't know, for a fact, if OJ killed anyone.
 
Mott the Hoople said:
Don't know...Our courts don't decide innocence. Just guilty or not guilty.

I was working from my home when that trial occurred. There is absolutely no doubt that the Jury made the correct decision in the OJ murder trial. The reasonable doubt hole was so big Super Stupid could have driven his ego through it.
Click to expand...

Well in that case how can you decide otherwise in the Zimmerman case there was reasonable doubt aplenty? Doesn't mean he was guilty or innocent, I strongly believe that Scottish legal system with three possible verdicts innocent, not proven and guilty is the correct approach.
 
Abraxas said:
Well in that case how can you decide otherwise in the Zimmerman case there was reasonable doubt aplenty? Doesn't mean he was guilty or innocent, I strongly believe that Scottish legal system with three possible verdicts innocent, not proven and guilty is the correct approach.
Click to expand...
I didn't. You have not read my posts carefully. I agreed with the Zimmerman verdict that reasonable doubt existed as to his being guilty of murder.

I still think he's a clown and that the prosecution over reacted to public pressure and over charged him. They should of charged him with something more reasonable...like being criminally stupid.

Using the Scottish standard I would have voted not guilty and hope that would have left him open to civil charges. However since the judge in the Zimmerman case instructed the jury to include an SYG defense under Florida law he is immune from civil prosecution.
 
Last edited:
Mott the Hoople said:
I would never advocate the killing of another human being. I accept the factual basis of the jury's verdict that aquited him. I'll take the higher road.

Having said that, I do take some small measure of satisfaction that this inept coward has become a social pariah. :)
Click to expand...

I like the lower road. If someone pops him in the back of the head (or pulls a Dick Cheney and pops him in the face), I will feel what goes around comes around.
 
To paraphrase Ghandi....an eye for an eye and pretty soon everyone is blind. Zimmerman will have to answer to a higher power some day.

The prosecutors deserve a lot of criticism for over charging him with a very weak case. A lesser charge could have won a felon conviction. Put his ass away for a long time and left him open to civil charges.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top