moon
Satire for Sanity
Sure. just shackle yourself to the other dumbo and you can fuck off as well.Oh THIS should be good!
It's common knowledge that the GA can overrule the SC. It's written into the fabric of the UN.
GHF proves IDF did not shoot at innocent Gazans at aid distribution sites
- Thread starter volsrocks
- Start date
It's common knowledge that the GA can overrule the SC. It's written into the fabric of the UN.
IBDaMann
Well-known member
All bombing and attacking by the Israeli Terror Force has been without "human shields." The ITF, up to this point, have simply been slaughtering defenseless Arabs and destroying Arab property. This is a straight-up genocide, with hundreds of egregious war crimes being committed every day by Israel.
You need to be careful. Amnesty International is the boy who cried "wolf". The organization has spent decades roasting its own credibility over a bon fire. Today, when Amnesty International makes a claim, the immediate assumption is that they are lying.
It would be much better for your argument if you simply point to the 4th Geneva Convention, to which Israel is a signatory, and point out that according to that particular international law, from the very moment the IDF entered Gaza in October 2023, they officially become "The Protecting Power" and incurred the full legal and moral responsibility to actively protect every single civilian noncombatant, just as if they were Gaza's police department, not immediately begin slaughtering the Gazans wholesale, indiscriminantly, by machine gun fire from swarming helicopter gunships. The IDF also incurred the full legal and moral obligation to ensure access to adequate food and sustenance, clean drinking water, medical supplies and medicines, and shelter for all Gazans, not to blockade all of the above to ensure starvation, denial of medical care, destruction of hospitals, deprival of drinking water, etc. ... all leading directly to the deaths of hundreds of Gazans. The IDF also incurred the full legal and moral responsibility to provide special protections to children under 14 years of age, and to women, not to target the most densely populated public centers and force parents to fish their dead children's bodies out of rubble or require pregnant women to give birth in the street in unacceptably unsanitary conditions.
The IDF is carrying out a genocide. The IDF is committing hundreds of violations of the 4th Geneva Convention every day. It is always best to leave Amnesty International out of the discussion.
Correction ... with the specific intent to eradicate the Arabs of Gaza. There is no Palestine. There are no Palestinians; only Arabs who self-identify as "Palestinians." This grandstanding only serves to distract attention from the genocide of Arabs.
IBDaMann
Well-known member
It is a somewhat common misconception that the General Assembly can somehow overrule the Security Council. However, if the General Assembly could overrule the Security Council, all votes would therefore occur in the General Assembly.
The Security Council is the final word and cannot be overruled. The General Assembly has almost no authority and is essentially powerless. All power lies in the Security Council.
The UN has no fabric.
IBDaMann
Well-known member
Iran attacked Israel, through their proxy Al Qassam. Iran has been the only attacker of Israel since 1979. Your insistence that broke Gazan administrators, and not Al Qassam, somehow attacked Israel is absurd. Hamas, civilian administrators, never attacked anyone ... and you know it. Al Qassam is the militant terrorist organization that is hell bent on destroying Israel at the behest of Iran ... and you know it. Why you decide to become a blatant liar on this issue is beyond me, but lying is all you've been doing.
Have you yet found any images of "Hamas fighters" that aren't actually Al Qassam soldiers? Of course not. Lie. Lie. Lie.
IBDaMann
Well-known member
Dead people can't be told anything.
They did. Hamas was a political party that grew out of a charitable organization. That's what political parties do, i.e. they try to win elections ... or steal them if they are Marxist-run.
You should learn your geography. There is no Palestine. Hamas administered Gaza.
There are people who self-identify as the opposite gender, who self identify as vampires, or who self identify as Palestinians. They are not, however, any of the things they claim. There are no Palestinians; there is no Palestine.
Too funny. You really should only apply this emojee when you aren't getting everything wrong.
moon
Satire for Sanity
You're not mistaken- you're a liar.
You know full well that the GA can overrule the SC via its agreed resolution.
How are you going to phrase your apology ?
How are you going to excuse yourself to the forum contrary, Nightsoil ?
Haw, haw........................................haw.
moon
Satire for Sanity
In matters pertaining to peace, the UN General Assembly is empowered, by resolution, to overrule the Security Council.
This action requires a two-thirds General Assembly majority.
Common knowledge.
Dumbasses and liars dispute it. We've got one of each here in Nightsoil and IBdeMonkey.
This action requires a two-thirds General Assembly majority.
Common knowledge.
Dumbasses and liars dispute it. We've got one of each here in Nightsoil and IBdeMonkey.
IBDaMann
Well-known member
So, is it safe to assume that you are a Holocaust denier who recognizes that there were still a buunnch of Jews after WWII ended?
IBDaMann
Well-known member
Please familiarize yourself with the "2nd Nakba". The Likud party is the party of the 2nd Nakba and Netanyahu knew that he would become a legend immortalized if he were the one to pull it off.
There are no Palestinians for whom Netanyahu can violate rights. Netanyahu needs to cease and desist with the genocide of Arabs.
ZenMode
Well-known member
Hamas is a terroist org
The Hamas that currently runs the government is the same Hamas that operated as a terrorist organization for decades in Gaza. When Fatah was in power, It was Hamas firing rockets into Israel.
Maybe if you understood the situation more, you wouldn't feel inclined to run cover for terrorists.
IBDaMann
Well-known member
Sure. You fail to provide proof, you apologize, admit you lied and then you fuck off. We are in total agreement.
Why put off until tomorrow what can be done today? You can apologize to me right now if you wish.
IBDaMann
Well-known member
Trivia Question: Why does no one have any evidence of any Gaza Administrators hiding behind any humans? [answer forthcoming]
IBDaMann
Well-known member
Says the dude who thinks there is a country called Palestine.
IBDaMann
Well-known member
Are you saying that you have a sock? What the fuqk?
IBDaMann
Well-known member
Did you just learn this? Thank you for sharing, nonetheless.
moon
Satire for Sanity
No frets. State again that you will apologize and fuck off should the means exist for the UN General Assembly to overrule the UN Security Council.
That should be your final post here. Name changes will not be accepted.
moon
Satire for Sanity
The UK and France are sworn to recognize it later this year- along with the 148 countries that already do. A ' state ' presupposes a territory, of course.
You are an imbecile that believes in the power of lies.
IBDaMann
Well-known member
I'm curious, why do you say this? Is it because you allow others to do your thinking for you and you regurgitate as ordered? ... or do you not know what a terrorist organization is?
Nope. You can't cite a single example of Hamas ever attacking anyone. All you can do is cite Iran's proxies (who do not include Hamas) attacking Israel.
That was Hezbollah. Maybe if you understood the situation more, you wouldn't feel inclined to run cover for Zionist terrorists and blame civilian administrators for the deeds of terrorists.
Why are you running cover for seemingly all terrorists?
IBDaMann
Well-known member
How much are you planning on pivoting before and after I agree to listen to your apology? What you wrote above is very different from what you wrote previously.
Is it your position that if the UN Security Council passes a resolution, that the General Assembly can step in and modify the language of the resolution?