giving tax breaks with one hand

Without jobs the economy will not recover.
without jobs credit matters little since people cannot buy things to keep businesses in business. Jobless people pay no taxes, etc.

our economy depends 70% on what consumers with jobs buy.
 
which means they will have to pay more taxes. how can you say that isn't a tax increase?


Are you serious? It doesn't mean they pay more taxes. It means they have less of their now lower taxes withheld from each paycheck than they perhaps should. In the end, their taxes will still be $400 or $800 lower as the case may be.
 
The stimulus has little to do with getting credit flowing. The bank bailouts on the other hand . . .
Yeah, sorry "bailouts"... I should have said "bailouts". The "stimulus" is "saving" jobs... Do you know why? Because it is impossible to prove how many it "saves" and even though it is supposedly creating jobs already, we have still seen increases in the losses.

It has yet to be strongly effective.
 
Are you serious? It doesn't mean they pay more taxes. It means they have less of their now lower taxes withheld from each paycheck than they perhaps should. In the end, their taxes will still be $400 or $800 lower as the case may be.

If they got a $400 dollar tax rebate check, then have to pay $100 of it back at tax time, their taxes got raised that year. I understand that you have to defend your dems in office, but even YOU can see the truth in the tax increase.
 
Yeah, sorry "bailouts"... I should have said "bailouts". The "stimulus" is "saving" jobs... Do you know why? Because it is impossible to prove how many it "saves" and even though it is supposedly creating jobs already, we have still seen increases in the losses.

It has yet to be strongly effective.


Waah! Things are not fixed in the first hundred days of Obama.

Sheesh what a bunch of Hooverites.
 
If they got a $400 dollar tax rebate check, then have to pay $100 of it back at tax time, their taxes got raised that year. I understand that you have to defend your dems in office, but even YOU can see the truth in the tax increase.


Dude, you're completely wrong on this one. It's not even arguable.
 
Waah! Things are not fixed in the first hundred days of Obama.

Sheesh what a bunch of Hooverites.
I'm not crying, nor even really complaining. I'm pointing out that it is yet to be strongly effective and noting that they are using the or "saved" portion a bit liberally.

Although, now that you mention it, I will also note that it will only work for so long. At some point people are not going to be satisfied with all the "saved or created" going in the "saved" column...
 
Dude, you're completely wrong on this one. It's not even arguable.

why are you being obtuse? did they change the tax tables? in changing those tax tables, did the level of taxation go up? It must have if the money they recieved the year before has to be paid back, in whole or in part.

Whats not arguable is your refusal to acknowledge that taxes went up.
 
If they got a $400 dollar tax rebate check, then have to pay $100 of it back at tax time, their taxes got raised that year. I understand that you have to defend your dems in office, but even YOU can see the truth in the tax increase.
Not really. If you get a larger rebate than you were due it is not a tax increase when they take what you were overpaid back.

It would be like getting an extra $50 on a paycheck due to an accounting error, so instead of just making you write a check they let you keep it and took it out of the next check you received. That wouldn't make it so you got a "pay cut".
 
Not really. If you get a larger rebate than you were due it is not a tax increase when they take what you were overpaid back.

It would be like getting an extra $50 on a paycheck due to an accounting error, so instead of just making you write a check they let you keep it and took it out of the next check you received. That wouldn't make it so you got a "pay cut".

Bingo!
 
that is funny coming from a Bushie.

Bush spent his billions Obama his TRILLIONS! You don't quadruple a debt just because another guy spent too much...well logical fallacies of liberal thinking aside, intelligent people don't make those kinds of justifications.
 
Not really. If you get a larger rebate than you were due it is not a tax increase when they take what you were overpaid back.

It would be like getting an extra $50 on a paycheck due to an accounting error, so instead of just making you write a check they let you keep it and took it out of the next check you received. That wouldn't make it so you got a "pay cut".

Yes, the Obama shell game, isn't he the clever one.
 
how does one get a larger rebate than they should have?
By a mistake on the tables. Did you read the article? How does it sometimes happen that the accountants at somebody's place of work pay somebody a bit too much? Look. I may not like the politics of Obama, but that doesn't mean I have to try to spin everything that happens into "Something Evil Obama Has Done"... (Sounds like the good title of an Epic Poem. I may have to start writing it...)
 
Back
Top