Global Warming, Climate Change, politics, religion, or science?

Into the Night

Verified User
The global warming protagonists are still out there, still saying the 'globe is warming' or the 'climate is changing' and it's all caused by Man.

This is a religion attempting to become a State Religion. It is a religion involving politics.

This thread is here to discuss the politics, the religious nature of the believers, the mathematics, and the science.

Like the Ozone Hole scare of yesterday, there is a lot of fear mongering for political purposes.
 
The global warming protagonists are still out there, still saying the 'globe is warming' or the 'climate is changing' and it's all caused by Man.

This is a religion attempting to become a State Religion. It is a religion involving politics.

This thread is here to discuss the politics, the religious nature of the believers, the mathematics, and the science.

Like the Ozone Hole scare of yesterday, there is a lot of fear mongering for political purposes.

Very true. I will add that many of these people seem to not even realize that they are practicing a religion, as they seem to narrowmindedly view religion as "blind belief in god(s)"...

The funny thing is, these people claim that global warming is scientific, yet it is anything BUT scientific... It is instead much more political and religious, if anything...
 
Global warming is only backed by 98 percent of scientists. Backed by NASA. Backed by almost every industrial country. Backed by all evidence .Not backed by Republicans and fossil fuel advocates. Global warming proof is science and data.
 
Global warming is only backed by 98 percent of scientists. Backed by NASA. Backed by almost every industrial country.
Who cares? ... Appeal To Authority Fallacy...

Backed by all evidence.
Evidence is not proof.

Not backed by Republicans and fossil fuel advocates.
Ignored partisan BS...
No one advocates for using fossils as fuel.

Global warming proof is science and data.
Data does not prove anything; neither does science. Science is an open functional system; Science does not have the power of proof; Neither does religion.


Try again...
 
Last edited:
Very true. I will add that many of these people seem to not even realize that they are practicing a religion, as they seem to narrowmindedly view religion as "blind belief in god(s)"...

The funny thing is, these people claim that global warming is scientific, yet it is anything BUT scientific... It is instead much more political and religious, if anything...

You are fucking nuts, and have no real value in discussion if you can so easily yank that nonsense out without a second thought. Sounds more like you're the one following a cult like mentality to me. As an avid Christian, I can tell you the trying to compare it to a religion part is pretty deranged. Science is based on facts, it doesn't care what you believe. Thinking you know better then the consensus of those, that actually spent there lives studying these things, is a joke. What's your qualifications keyboard soldier?
 
Who cares? ... Appeal To Authority Fallacy...


Evidence is not proof.


No one advocates for using fossils as fuel.


Data does not prove anything; neither does science. Science is an open functional system; Science does not have the power of proof; Neither does religion.


Try again...

You are sickly deluded. How do you think antibiotics were created? With proof dingdong, with proof. Go play in the sandbox kid.
 
The global warming protagonists are still out there, still saying the 'globe is warming' or the 'climate is changing' and it's all caused by Man.

This is a religion attempting to become a State Religion. It is a religion involving politics.

This thread is here to discuss the politics, the religious nature of the believers, the mathematics, and the science.

Like the Ozone Hole scare of yesterday, there is a lot of fear mongering for political purposes.

dear fucking idiot,

science has proven the manmade element to GW


fuck you very much
 
You are fucking nuts,
Andddddd we're off to a charming start, I see... 'You're insane' mantra dismissed...

and have no real value in discussion if you can so easily yank that nonsense out without a second thought.
Argument of the Stone fallacy dismissed.

Sounds more like you're the one following a cult like mentality to me.
Now I guess I'm part of a cult... Bulverism fallacy dismissed.

As an avid Christian,
Your claimed Christianity has no bearing on a global warming discussion...

I can tell you the trying to compare it to a religion part is pretty deranged.
Not at all... A 'religion' is an initial circular argument with additional arguments stemming from that initial circular argument. That philosophically based definition fits the Church of Global Warming quite well... 'You're insane' mantra dismissed...

Science is based on facts, it doesn't care what you believe.
Science is not based on facts... Science is a set of falsifiable theories.
Also, a fact is NOT a universal truth, nor is it a proof. A fact is shorthand predicate that is accepted by all parties. If a fact is denied by at least one party, then the fact returns back to being an argument.

Thinking you know better then the consensus of those, that actually spent there lives studying these things, is a joke.
Obviously, I do know better, because anyone who believes that global warming is true denies not only the laws of thermodynamics, but also denies the stefan-boltzmann law.

What's your qualifications keyboard soldier?
Appeal to Authority fallacy... A person's qualifications does not affect the content of their assertions.


Try again.
 
Along with other scientists from the department, and the Scripps Institution of Oceanography in California, Swart found that changes seen in Southern Ocean temperature are directly tied to ozone depletion and human-induced greenhouse gas emissions, as opposed to regular temperature variations or responses to natural climate changes, such as volcanic eruptions or changes in the sun.
Their findings were published in the scientific journal Nature Geoscience on Monday.
 
ITS OVER

SCIENCE PROVED IT IDIOTS

Science does not prove anything... Science is an open functional system... Open functional systems do NOT have the power of proof.

Only closed functional systems have that power, such as logic and mathematics.
 
https://www.nationalobserver.com/201...tarctic-waters


For the first time, scientists prove human activity is the top cause of warming Antarctic waters
By Kelsey Litwin in News, Energy, Politics | September 25th 2018

Along with other scientists from the department, and the Scripps Institution of Oceanography in California, Swart found that changes seen in Southern Ocean temperature are directly tied to ozone depletion and human-induced greenhouse gas emissions, as opposed to regular temperature variations or responses to natural climate changes, such as volcanic eruptions or changes in the sun.
Their findings were published in the scientific journal Nature Geoscience on Monday.
 
Science does not prove anything... Science is an open functional system... Open functional systems do NOT have the power of proof.

Only closed functional systems have that power, such as logic and mathematics.

fuck you rambling idiot




you were duped and they proved in conclusively.



Just because to you there is no such thing as a FACT doesn't mean all other humans are as stupid as you
 
Back
Top