Ishmael Pequod
Banned
Ignorant blowfish. The republicans are as bad as the democrats. You're speaking to a conservative. Tell us how a tax will fix global warming. Go.
Global Warming is Increasing and Could Exceed 4º C by 2100!
- Thread starter Dantès
- Start date
Ignorant blowfish. The republicans are as bad as the democrats. You're speaking to a conservative. Tell us how a tax will fix global warming. Go.
Canceled.2014.2
Canceled
If your a conservative....nahhh...I have too many friends that are conservative and thoughtful.
Ishmael Pequod
Banned
Sure you do. You have as many friends as you do false premises and propaganda props as you need. It's easier than defending your position. You're weak. Any of your conservative friends ever mention a writer named Mark Levin?
Ishmael Pequod
Banned
So Chris Hayes is whining about conservatives ridiculing and mocking global warming. Hey, Chris, ever here of karma?
ralfy
Verified User
AGW is very much a done deal, as even scientific studies sponsored by deniers (such as BEST) have revealed.
One should not expect the government and businesses to take action, though, as they are, together with a growing middle class, dependent on oil use to maintain economic growth.
One should not expect the government and businesses to take action, though, as they are, together with a growing middle class, dependent on oil use to maintain economic growth.
What are you drivelling about now? We're all dead as a result of you morons preventing international action, as you know. The few generations left to come will curse your stinking memory, filth.
evince
Truthmatters
hahahahahahaha
why is it this is what all the cons say now?
so they can vote republican and pretend they are not republicans.
that way they can pretend its not their fault the republican party cheats in elections to help them get their way even against what the American people really want
evince
Truthmatters
man I wish I could meet some
"Climate sceptics like to criticise climate models for getting things wrong, and we are the first to admit they are not perfect," said Sherwood. "But what we are finding is that the mistakes are being made by the models which predict less warming, not those that predict more."
This doesn't even make sense when the models that predicted more warming were less accurate.
How can a model that was more inline with actual temperatures be less accurate in its prediction than models that had predictions less inline with actual temperatures?
This why you believe in CAGW. You are so clueless, you can't even spot obvious contradictions
This doesn't even make sense when the models that predicted more warming were less accurate.
How can a model that was more inline with actual temperatures be less accurate in its prediction than models that had predictions less inline with actual temperatures?
This why you believe in CAGW. You are so clueless, you can't even spot obvious contradictions
Ishmael Pequod
Banned
Oh my god.
Ishmael Pequod
Banned
They all live in his head.
No good trying to grovel to Him, kid. After scanning your drivel and your mates' action He absconded long since.
Ishmael Pequod
Banned
He's weak and stupid. Good idea.
What if they did? Why would it matter? That's no different than asking, did any of your conservative friends mention the writer, Annie Coultergeist! Or even von Heyak or von Mises or Leo Strauss? What fucking difference would that make? It's totally irrelevant!
Ishmael Pequod
Banned
So are his imaginary friends.
What he is saying is that those who are predicting less warming over the long term are being proven wrong by the emerging models not that there hasn't been a temporary slowing of the amount of temperature increase. In fact, more and more ice is melting and there are no glaciers in the world that are increasing in size nor are the ice fields in any location increasing in size. More and more of Greenland is being exposed every year. And more and more of the ice cover in every location on the globe that has an ice cover is receding! This is obvious from photographs, not from models, but from comparative analysis of pictures of ice flows over time. The evidence is indeed undeniable. But that is not what he is talking about here he is specifically referring to the models and where the mistakes in modeling are occurring.
He lives in Ohio, it is quite likely that he has friends who are conservatives. And you have no idea whether he has friends who are or aren't conservative none whatsoever. So all your talk on this subject is irrelevant.