God's Work

No sir! He's a maverick. You betcha!

0909-palin-mccain.jpg

Another irrelevant painfully stupid off topic post by the forums dishonest moron on the left; Yay you!
 
While the Constitution does not contain the phrase "separation of church and State" that comes from a letter written by Jefferson, the portion of the First Amendment prohibiting Congress from passing a law respecting the establishment of a religion is considered the "separation clause".

So the Constitution does NOT have a "separation clause"; thank you for admitting your full of shit.
 
You're quoting it as if it were fact. But it isn't fact, it is hearsay and if you think that hearsay is admissible if the attorney presenting the evidence does not present the evidence in a way that is prejudicial.

In this debate, it is being used as evidence to support the stupid claims of Liberals who are obviously prejudiced. It is inadmissible Counselor, therefore, you're an idiot.

Your confused, this is not a court. You are not a judge. In certain types of hearings hearsay is presentable specifically because it is prejudicial.
 
So the Constitution does NOT have a "separation clause"; thank you for admitting your full of shit.

I'm simply saying that the Constitution declared that the legislature should "make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof," thus building a wall of separation between Church & State.
 
My point is that he said a person was a dunce if they used the term "Separation of Church and State" to describe the establishment clause. Which is exactly what Jefferson did.

Is that what I said you dishonest moron?

Because you are stuck on this special brand of stupid, let me re-post it here because not only are you an uninformed dunce, but you have the memory of a lemming or are just an outright lying dunce. I am thinking it is all of the above:

Another clueless dunce who doesn't know what the Constitution says. It's not about a separation of church and state you boring leftist dunces; it says they cannot make any law ESTABLISHING a religion. It says NOTHING about a SEPARATION you morons.

Yes, you really are THAT pathetic and THAT stupid.
 
Is that what I said you dishonest moron?

Because you are stuck on this special brand of stupid, let me re-post it here because not only are you an uninformed dunce, but you have the memory of a lemming or are just an outright lying dunce. I am thinking it is all of the above:

Another clueless dunce who doesn't know what the Constitution says. It's not about a separation of church and state you boring leftist dunces; it says they cannot make any law ESTABLISHING a religion. It says NOTHING about a SEPARATION you morons.

Yes, you really are THAT pathetic and THAT stupid.

So, you would not call Jefferson a dunce, you would call him a moron?
 
I am claiming they refer to the same thing.

Wrong; they do not refer to the same thing. The Constitution is clear; what part of it do you continue to not comprehend and compells you to fabricate your own version of it?

Here; so that there can be NO confusion for you:

Article I

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
 
I'd hate to have the job of counting how many times this freak says "dunce" every day.

It would be worse to have the job of trying to find a morsel of truth or honesty in any of the voluminous amount of dunce like posts you spam this forum with.
 
Wrong; they do not refer to the same thing. The Constitution is clear; what part of it do you continue to not comprehend and compells you to fabricate your own version of it?

Here; so that there can be NO confusion for you:

Article I

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

I'm simply saying that the Constitution declared that the legislature should "make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof," thus building a wall of separation between Church & State.
 
I'm simply saying that the Constitution declared that the legislature should "make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof," thus building a wall of separation between Church & State.

Where does it say thus building a wall of separation between Church & State?
 
The WH denied it because a BBC documentary was coming out and it wasn't flattering to bush.

"The claims are due to be broadcast in a three-part BBC documentary which analyses attempts to bring peace to the Middle East. Mr Shaath, the Palestinian foreign minister in 2003, claims Mr Bush told him and other delegates that he was spoken to by God over his plans for war.

He told the film-makers: "President Bush said to all of us: 'I'm driven with a mission from God. God would tell me, George, go and fight those terrorists in Afghanistan. And I did, and then God would tell me, George, go and end the tyranny in Iraq... And I did.

"'And now, again, I feel God's words coming to me, Go get the Palestinians their state and get the Israelis their security, and get peace in the Middle East. And by God I'm gonna do it.'"

http://www.theguardian.com/world/2005/oct/07/usa.jamessturcke

Even when proven to be a dishonest moron; you can't stop and want to completely remove any doubt. Yay you!
 
Back
Top