Good question.

If she is telling the truth, then why didn't she go to the police over 30 years ago?

in these times how can you be so out of touch with reality? people have come out after many decades to charge priests with sex crimes. Cosby is in jail for crimes long ago. But in this case, he is not being charged. He is being interviewed for a job. Sexual assault is a big part of his resume.
 
Last edited:
in these times how can you be so out of touch with reality? people have come out after many decades to charge priests with sex crimes. Cosby is in jail for crimes long ago. But in this case, he is not being charged. He is being interviewed for a job. Sexual assault is a big part of his resume.

Evidence. Where is the evidence? I haven't seen any. Even Fords best friend knew nothing about this until recently. This whole thing stinks. It's totally bogus.
 
Evidence. Where is the evidence? I haven't seen any. Even Fords best friend knew nothing about this until recently. This whole thing stinks. It's totally bogus.

What would evidence look like? You are road blocking. This is about credibility after many years. she is credible.
 
What would evidence look like? You are road blocking. This is about credibility after many years. she is credible.

What about the 12 women who accused Bill Clinton of sexual assault? You never hear liberals talking about that. He also made 25 trips on the Lolita Express. 5 of them without the Secret Service. You just know he was boinking little girls on there. But liberals defending him to the death, while claiming Trump is evil. There's a name for that. It's called selective outrage.
 
What about the 12 women who accused Bill Clinton of sexual assault? You never hear liberals talking about that. He also made 25 trips on the Lolita Express. 5 of them without the Secret Service. You just know he was boinking little girls on there. But liberals defending him to the death, while claiming Trump is evil. There's a name for that. It's called selective outrage.

oh, so Clinton is somehow connected to Bretts supreme court seat? And of course you know lots of liberals criticized Clintons womanizing. I know i did. Clintons actions were reprehensible. So are bretts. It is not relevant to todays times nor to Kavanaugh.
 
The way I see it is that without a criminal conviction, there is no crime. Regardless of what any "witnesses" say, there is no reason not to confirm his appointment.

then why did the GOP refuse to bring/allow the 2nd man at the scene of the (alleged) crime to testify?
 
So you're saying that when she was a teenager she was a "whore" for attending a party of her peers, and that okays two clowns trying to jump her (allegedly)?

You have to be one of the dumbest fuckers I've ever seen on the Internet.

Yes, she is a whore, she kept going to the parties and didn't complain for 36 years.

Kill yourself.
 
So you're saying she has a political agenda. I have to agree. Edited. Just saw that.

No, he didn't say she had a political agenda, being that she is not a politician. He's saying that she had personal experience as to why this joker shouldn't sit on the SCOTUS bench. By your "standard", any citizen who publicly complains about a politician of public official has a political agenda. So all the jokers who parroted the lies about Obama weren't just citizens expressing their opinions, they had a "political agenda" according to you? :wha:
 
Kav must have been drinking today. He was belligerent, rude, weepy and loud. He yelled over questioners and was nasty. That was not judicial temperament on display. This was a disqualifying performance.
 
It is not a fucking trial. It is a job interview. There are 4 women now. Kavanaugh will not make it. The female Arpaio prosecutor has to do a hell of a job to save him. I don't think it is possible.

no.....there was only one.......she was the most credible and fell flat on her face.....sucks to be a demmycrat this week.......
 
no.....there was only one.......she was the most credible and fell flat on her face.....sucks to be a demmycrat this week.......

Flat on her face? What kind of red-tinted glasses do you wear? She was an expert witness who was careful and professional. Very impressive. Very believable.
Kavanaugh was a baby, crying and yelling like he was drunk. He was rude and abusive to the Dems especially Klobuchar. but then, that is his history with women, isn't it. he was far from in control demonstrating an utter lack of judicial temperament. Can you oimagine him yelling and screaming in supreme court decisions?
 
Flat on her face? What kind of red-tinted glasses do you wear? She was an expert witness who was careful and professional. Very impressive. Very believable.
Kavanaugh was a baby, crying and yelling like he was drunk. He was rude and abusive to the Dems especially Klobuchar. but then, that is his history with women, isn't it. he was far from in control demonstrating an utter lack of judicial temperament. Can you oimagine him yelling and screaming in supreme court decisions?

you obviously had the volume turned down as you watched.......you should have listened to what was said instead of just watching......Kavanaugh will be confirmed......
 
Kav must have been drinking today. He was belligerent, rude, weepy and loud. He yelled over questioners and was nasty. That was not judicial temperament on display. This was a disqualifying performance.


And IF someone attacked YOUR reputation and YOUR family ....

You ! Would reply how ?
 
It is not a fucking trial. It is a job interview. There are 4 women now. Kavanaugh will not make it. The female Arpaio prosecutor has to do a hell of a job to save him. I don't think it is possible.

Since when is it a felony to lie during a "job interview"??
 
Back
Top