Good question.

[Taichiliberal]

So you think the only "good" people on the bench are the far Left whackjobs? Please!

You seem to have a penchant for total misrepresentation of what people write in plain, coherent English. "Good" people on the bench legislate/decree for the benefit of all...that sometimes means you and I don't always get what we want. But as Justice O'Connor proved, we can get what we need.

Clarence Thomas was not only unqualified, he also displayed some serious psychological baggage that would normally keep him from heading many a company or business. Kavanaugh has gone on record saying that the POTUS should be exempt from legal public accountability just because of the nature of his job. Funny that he and his political brethren threw that idealism out the window with Slick Willy.

 

[rjhenn]

If Kavenaugh's accuser has no political agenda, why did she take her complaint to politicians, instead of law enforcement?

Perhaps because that's where her victimizer was.

 

[rjhenn]

If she is telling the truth, then why didn't she go to the police over 30 years ago?

Perhaps because she was a teen in a society that wasn't supportive of such accusations. She's older now, but the society hasn't changed much.

 

[rjhenn]

Those are little boys. These are old drunken, politically motivated whores.

Hey, 'genius', she was a teen when this happened to her.

 

[Teflon Don]

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/20...she-linked-to-kavanaugh-was-in-2008-not-2012/

She says that the seminal event that led to these memories coming up were a big fight over a remodel she and her husband did in 2012. That was in her opening statement and it was in her sworn testimony.

The thing is, according to building permits the work was done in 2008.

 

[rjhenn]

And IF someone attacked YOUR reputation and YOUR family ....

You ! Would reply how ?

Who attacked his family?
OTOH, Ford and her family have reportedly received death threats. Typical GOP.

 

[Boris The Animal]

You seem to have a penchant for total misrepresentation of what people write in plain, coherent English. "Good" people on the bench legislate/decree for the benefit of all...that sometimes means you and I don't always get what we want. But as Justice O'Connor proved, we can get what we need.

Clarence Thomas was not only unqualified, he also displayed some serious psychological baggage that would normally keep him from heading many a company or business. Kavanaugh has gone on record saying that the POTUS should be exempt from legal public accountability just because of the nature of his job. Funny that he and his political brethren threw that idealism out the window with Slick Willy.

Ahh yes, the Left's token "Conservative" O'Connor, who may as well been a Dumbshitocrat with her rulings. Thomas is infinitely more qualified than Darth Bader, Soto, Kagan, or Breyer combined!

 

[Grugore]

Hey, 'genius', she was a teen when this happened to her.

Allegedly happened.

 

[Grugore]

Who attacked his family?
OTOH, Ford and her family have reportedly received death threats. Typical GOP.

They claim to have received death threats. Is there any proof?

 

[Grugore]

Perhaps because she was a teen in a society that wasn't supportive of such accusations. She's older now, but the society hasn't changed much.

She hasn't been a teen in over 30 years. Why was she silent this whole time?

 

[Ross Dolan]

If Kavenaugh's accuser has no political agenda, why did she take her complaint to politicians, instead of law enforcement?

Because Kavanaugh was being nominated for the Supreme Court...and that was what she wanted to stop. She apparently was not (and still isn't) interested in bringing a criminal case. She was concerned about the country.

Jesus H. Christ...why do things like this have to be explained to people like you?

 

[Fentoine Lum]

Who attacked his family?
OTOH, Ford and her family have reportedly received death threats. Typical GOP.

Maybe Bart's daughters need to be subjected to drunken choir boy pack animals too, in the cell phone and anti-social media age; perhaps he'll develop a capacity for understanding what he did.

 

[rjhenn]

They claim to have received death threats. Is there any proof?

Not that I know of, but that's typically how conservatives react to criticism.

 

[rjhenn]

She hasn't been a teen in over 30 years. Why was she silent this whole time?

She was probably trying to forget it happened, then he popped up on the national news.

 

[rjhenn]

Because Kavanaugh was being nominated for the Supreme Court...and that was what she wanted to stop. She apparently was not (and still isn't) interested in bringing a criminal case. She was concerned about the country.

Jesus H. Christ...why do things like this have to be explained to people like you?

Because concern for the country is foreign to their nature?

 

[Taichiliberal]

Ahh yes, the Left's token "Conservative" O'Connor, who may as well been a Dumbshitocrat with her rulings. Thomas is infinitely more qualified than Darth Bader, Soto, Kagan, or Breyer combined!

Anyone with an honest, objective and informed view of history knows that O'Connor was anything BUT a "token" conservative. By your mindset, any politician that acts or rules against reaganomics and the corporate/wall st. version of a "free market" is an automatic scion of America.

Also, you might want to do some honest, objective homework comparison of Thomas record to date as opposed to Thurgood Marshall. FYI, and all.

 

[Boris The Animal]

Anyone with an honest, objective and informed view of history knows that O'Connor was anything BUT a "token" conservative. By your mindset, any politician that acts or rules against reaganomics and the corporate/wall st. version of a "free market" is an automatic scion of America.

Also, you might want to do some honest, objective homework comparison of Thomas record to date as opposed to Thurgood Marshall. FYI, and all.

Trust me, Marshall is definitely NOT objective. he' like you, was a rabid Leftist.

 

[Taichiliberal]

Trust me, Marshall is definitely NOT objective. he' like you, was a rabid Leftist.

Obviously, you have NO actual knowledge of the subject matter beyond willfully ignorant, rabid right wing jabberings of supposition, conjecture, distortions and and sub par propaganda. Any attempt at a rational, fact based discussion with you is pointless. Carry on.

 

[Boris The Animal]

Obviously, you have NO actual knowledge of the subject matter beyond willfully ignorant, rabid right wing jabberings of supposition, conjecture, distortions and and sub par propaganda. Any attempt at a rational, fact based discussion with you is pointless. Carry on.

BS. "Rational" to you means total agreement.

 

[Taichiliberal]

BS. "Rational" to you means total agreement.

No, I mean when YOU make statements like you did regarding Sandra O'Connor or Thurgood Marshall without offering any valid proof other than your opinion (peppered with accusations), that is NOT a discussion, much less a debate. Your consistent leaning upon name calling is of no substance to the discussion at hand either. If you can't do better, then there is no point in further exchanges.