darla recently decided it would be a hoot to post an unauthorized picture of a wounded Marine in some anti military rant, that is one of the most dispicable, and low class things I've seen since the code pink protesters at Walter Reed. I refuse to particiate in anything that allows or uses pictures of wounded Vets, without their consent, to be propagandizied, politicized, or exploited in such a manor, and so I will be parting company with the community for now.
http://justplainpolitics.com/showthread.php?t=11536
I know I've butted heads with many here, but I've always tried to bring my philosophies, and ideals, with links and back them up with rigorous debate. We may not always agree on things, but I want most of you to know, and you who you are, I've known many of you for years now, and I don't do this easily, but Goodbye.
Thank you Damo, for providing the community.
WRL
Are you guys possibly this dense, the difference is he gave his permission to be there with McCain.
That's been what I've been saying this whole thread, there are plenty of anti war vets you can use, but STOP using ones who never gave you permission to use their pain for your political purposes. That is dishonorable and despicable.
And you used it anyway, which is the lowest, trashiest, most despicable thing one could do, that man suffered and gave all for this country, and you can't even give him the decency of not propagandizing his wounds.
What am I missing here?
it was A PUBLISHED NEWS ARTICLE. Since when are those off limits?
Real convientent excuse to depart just as OBAMA starts his march to victory!
What am I missing here?
it was A PUBLISHED NEWS ARTICLE. Since when are those off limits?
They're not.
If emo boy WRL is going to cry and take home his marbles over a photo in the public domain and published by news organizations, f*&^ him.
So this guys sacrafice is supposed to be ohly recognised by the people on the right?
She posted it in response to the sacrafice one makes when they go to war.
IB asked how you would talk someone out of going to Iraq and she posted a picture that showed the sacrafice you are agreeing to.
I really dont get why some people think they OWN the sacrafice of overs?
This Young man sacraficed for us all and ended up paying the ultimate price for his service. He suffered the most painful of injuries. Darla was correct to post a picture of a young man so willing to sacrafice. Its the reality of war. When a young person is thinking of going to war they should know all the realities of it. It is not a light decision.
This is why we should NEVER, NEVER enter into a war that is anything but Nessesary to the protection of our great country. If it is not worth the honor of the scarafice of wonderful young men like the young man pictured then it should never be entered.
This young man and his brothers and sisters who have sacraficed so much for us are no less great no less heroic and not less worthy than those who have scaraficed in all our nessesary wars. These peoples honor remains uneffected by the dishonor of those who insisted on their sacrafice on lies. It is Bush and his supporters whos honor is lessened.
It is those who for political reasons required the people who are honor bound to follow to go.
Its you who defend and defended lies for political reasons and sacraficed these people.
It is you who are dishonored not them.
They stand tall and deserve all the honor any soldier makes in any war.
It is you who deserve the scorn for putting politcal bull$#@ over our countries defense.
You and your party are about to start paying the price.
So this guys sacrafice is supposed to be ohly recognised by the people on the right?
She posted it in response to the sacrafice one makes when they go to war.
IB asked how you would talk someone out of going to Iraq and she posted a picture that showed the sacrafice you are agreeing to.
I really dont get why some people think they OWN the sacrafice of overs?
This Young man sacraficed for us all and ended up paying the ultimate price for his service. He suffered the most painful of injuries. Darla was correct to post a picture of a young man so willing to sacrafice. Its the reality of war. When a young person is thinking of going to war they should know all the realities of it. It is not a light decision.
This is why we should NEVER, NEVER enter into a war that is anything but Nessesary to the protection of our great country. If it is not worth the honor of the scarafice of wonderful young men like the young man pictured then it should never be entered.
This young man and his brothers and sisters who have sacraficed so much for us are no less great no less heroic and not less worthy than those who have scaraficed in all our nessesary wars. These peoples honor remains uneffected by the dishonor of those who insisted on their sacrafice on lies. It is Bush and his supporters whos honor is lessened.
It is those who for political reasons required the people who are honor bound to follow to go.
Its you who defend and defended lies for political reasons and sacraficed these people.
It is you who are dishonored not them.
They stand tall and deserve all the honor any soldier makes in any war.
It is you who deserve the scorn for putting politcal bullshit over our countries defense.
You and your party are about to start paying the price.
I've "known" WRL since before Bush was ever elected. We may not perfectly agree but we are certainly friends.
Whether you like him or not, I don't like losing posters because of crap like this.
Crap like people getting offended over somebody else's post like this."Crap" like what? What exactly is the "crap"? Please elaborate.
I saw a photo of a soldier that was in the public domain, and published by news organizations, and the photo was used on this board as a demonstration of the cost of war.
What was even remotely wrong, or crappy about that?