Government wants to install SPEED LIMITERS in cars.

What percentage of car accident fatalities result from 100mph+ crashes? :dunno:

The faster the car, the higher the probability that there will be a fatality. That is just a fact. Someone who regularly drives 100+mph on the public roads has a low probability of surviving, and a high probability of killing others.
 
The faster the car, the higher the probability that there will be a fatality. That is just a fact. Someone who regularly drives 100+mph on the public roads has a low probability of surviving, and a high probability of killing others.

Either you have no reading comprehension ... or you purposefully deflected, and avoided answering the question. Which is it?

What percentage of car accident fatalities result from 100mph+ crashes?
 
they have POWER to regulate the roadways, limited to things like number of lanes, direction of travel, speed limits, etc. They do NOT have power to regulate who uses the roadways.

As part of regulating the road is who has access to the road, and how they behave on the road. Sorry, you still do not have a Constitutional right to drive drunk.
 
Either you have no reading comprehension ... or you purposefully deflected, and avoided answering the question. Which is it?

What percentage of car accident fatalities result from 100mph+ crashes?

It is like saying that because only a small percent of deaths are caused by ingesting a rare poison, the poison is completely safe. If a poison has a 100% kill percent, it is not safe, no matter how rare it is.
 
It is like saying that because only a small percent of deaths are caused by ingesting a rare poison, the poison is completely safe. If a poison has a 100% kill percent, it is not safe, no matter how rare it is.

Going over 100mph is not 100% fatal. Just stop lying, Walt.

What percentage of car accident fatalities result from 100mph+ crashes?
 
The government has every right to regulate its roads.
'Regulate' does not mean ban. Redefinition fallacy.
If you do not like it, do not use the roads.
Sorry, dude. I have the inherent right to travel.
In this case, it is not even regulating roads, just investigating a possible solution. It is not a big deal.
A 'solution' to what? What is the 'problem'??
There is no legal way to walk across the USA.
Yes there is.
That bothers me.
Why? Do you want to walk across the USA?
Then we hear you complain that you have some constitutional right to drive drunk on government roads for free... I doubt that is a real constitutional right.
Rights do not come from the Constitution.
Deaths are far more common at high speeds then while parking a car.
Not that high a speed. Most automotive deaths are caused by intoxicated driving (alcohol is the most abused drug).
A much more tiny percent of cars are driving at 100mph.
Some do, and they don't have accidents because they are driving at 100mph. Most on open freeways drive around 80-90mph.
The chances of a car driving 100 mph having a fatal crash is many, many, many times higher than a car driving 15 mph.
You were talking about automotive accidents, not deaths. Goalpost fallacy.
 
What percentage of car accident fatalities result from 100mph+ crashes? :dunno:

Very few. Most fatalities in automotive accidents are to a pedestrian, bicyclist, or moped or motorcyclist, usually in urban areas with speeds around 30-40mph.
Another large percentage goes to intoxicated drivers (any drug, but alcohol is the most abused drug).
 
You know when you're out in the country and you see that speed limit sign with buckshot through it.........

now we know who....... ^^^^

Stop signs too. Billboards, speed limit signs, warning signs, stop signs, even mail boxes all seem to draw buckshot. My explosives magazine gets buckshot too. That's why it's built like it is, to withstand it.
 
The faster the car, the higher the probability that there will be a fatality.
Math errors: Failure to specify boundary. Failure to declare randX. You are denying probability math again.
That is just a fact.
Not a fact. An argument. Learn what 'fact' means. It does NOT mean Universal Truth.
Someone who regularly drives 100+mph on the public roads has a low probability of surviving,
Blatant lie.
and a high probability of killing others.
Blatant lie.

People regularly drive 100 mph on open freeways, and they do it regularly. No accident, no fatality, and they still survive to talk about it.
You deny probability mathematics, just as you deny statistical mathematics and algebra.
 
Either you have no reading comprehension ... or you purposefully deflected, and avoided answering the question. Which is it?

What percentage of car accident fatalities result from 100mph+ crashes?

He is evading. That's what he does. He won't answer the question.
 
A better question is what percentage of accidents were directly caused by speeding. That is, speeding caused the accident and wasn't just a secondary factor in it. Example, running a stop sign while speeding. Running the stop sign would be the cause of the accident, not speeding.

If speed alone were a major cause of accidents, then rural highways and interstates would be the deadliest roads in America because these have the highest speeds posted on them. But they are generally some of the safest with the lowest accident rates...
 
Stop signs too. Billboards, speed limit signs, warning signs, stop signs, even mail boxes all seem to draw buckshot. My explosives magazine gets buckshot too. That's why it's built like it is, to withstand it.

We need to have the Texas Country Games. like scottish highland games but less cultured.

hog shootin.
mail box shootin
cowtippin
deer guttin
quinsenellera dancin.

doc dutch might actually when the sausage eating contest.
 
Back
Top