Greta Thunberg

moon said:
No- YOU can't accommodate it BECAUSE THERE ISN'T ANY DATA FOR YOU TO PLAGIARIZE.
Click to expand...
In other words you can't indicate the relevance of a graviton to a closed system and how this has anything to do with the misnamed greenhouse effect. As I thought.
 
anonymoose;
giphy.webp

In other words you can't indicate it. As I thought.
Click to expand...


Echolalaic turnip.
 
anonymoose said:
As usual, they never ever discuss the science after claiming scientific superiority. Owl Droppings has had nine posts since my simple query this morning. The usual run and hide. Even when they google for answers they don't understand what they're reading.
Click to expand...

Look at a real physical theory like Quantum Electrodynamics which predicts the value of the anomalous electron magnetic dipole moment and experiments have subsequently confirmed the theory to a precision of 1 part in a trillion. The IPCC, on the other hand, can seemingly only manage to determine ECS to be in the range of 1.5 to 4.5C and they are not even sure about that. CMIP5 climate models all run way too hot, compared to HADCRUT4 data, and the new generation of CMIP6 models appear to be even worse.
 
Last edited:
'I want to thank all the people who I’ve met in North America for their incredible hospitality. And thank you all for your amazing support! '

(This wet plate photo was taken by Shane Balkowitsch on Standing Rock Reservation in North Dakota.)


74645262_974537962914024_6089409356732825600_o.jpg
Click to expand...


Nice one. Plenty of appeal for climatologists, eco warriors, plate photographers and ethno-anthropologists.

Meanwhile, poor old maggot is playing with his atomic-ware plastic poppets. Haw, haw..............................haw.
 
Last edited:
moon said:
Nice one. Plenty of appeal for climatologists, eco warriors, plate photographers and ethno-anthropologists.

Meanwhile, poor old maggot is playing with his atomic-ware plastic poppets. Haw, haw..............................haw.
Click to expand...

She probably has more Indian ancestry than Fauxcohontas! They should do one of you and call it Standing Cock.
 
You're still deteriorating, maggot, I'm pleased to observe. Gone is all pretense of civility and authority. Haw, haw.........................haw.
 
Havana Moon said:
Look at a real physical theory like Quantum Electrodynamics which predicts the value of the anomalous electron magnetic dipole moment and experiments have subsequently confirmed the theory to a precision of 1 part in a trillion. The IPCC, on the other hand, can seemingly only manage to determine ECS to be in the range of 1.5 to 4.5C and they are not even sure about that. CMIP5 climate models all run way too hot, compared to HADCRUT4 data, and the new generation of CMIP6 models appear to be even worse.
Click to expand...

That's beyond me but I ask pretty easy and understandable questions that are way over their heads apparently since they always run and hide or respond with a cartoon. That or they do know the answers to my uncomfortable questions which is why they don't answer.
 
You dopes are blind to the world around you. See if you can cut-and-paste your way out of the next environmental disaster to strike you and yours.
 
anonymoose said:
That's beyond me but I ask pretty easy and understandable questions that are way over their heads apparently since they always run and hide or respond with a cartoon. That or they do know the answers to my uncomfortable questions which is why they don't answer.
Click to expand...

Equilibrium Climate Sensitivity is the Holy Grail of climate science. Yet after more than three decades of IPCC reports they can't give a definitive answer. It's still between 1.5-4.5C and that's after umpteen billions of government money has been spent on 'climate research'.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top