3% of the population commit 90+ percent of all crimes. The same scroungy motherfuckers are menacing society over and over again.Heh. Most times all you need is a non-lethal option.
A non lethal option doesn't address this.
3% of the population commit 90+ percent of all crimes. The same scroungy motherfuckers are menacing society over and over again.Heh. Most times all you need is a non-lethal option.
Yes it does. Prosecute and imprison criminals, including any judge that supports criminal behavior.3% of the population commit 90+ percent of all crimes. The same scroungy motherfuckers are menacing society over and over again.
A non lethal option doesn't address this.
Not till that split second that law bidding gun owner pulled the trigger, as is usually the case with mass shootersDidn't he break the law?
1. If you can't copy and paste where I wrote such exactly as you accuse, then
That's the point ... no one is advocating confiscation for legally purchased weapons.
The fight is to tighten up laws to make it harder for nutjobs and criminals to get quality weaponry.
The questions raised in the OP remain.
Yeah, I’m sure Stephon Paddock thought the same
Aww, fact supported truths just frustrate this maga mook so bad that he's devolved to school yard retorts. Not surprising.
Ohh, look the CCP troll is here to spread lies.Gunshows
Yes it does. Prosecute and imprison criminals, including any judge that supports criminal behavior.
Ohh, look the CCP troll is here to spread lies.
Number of "mass" shootings committed using weapons acquired from gun shows - ZERO, ever.
But keep lying - it's all you gun grabber monkeys do. So fuck off CCP Bot-Hole, this is none of your business.
“Number of mass shootings committed using weapons acquired from gun shows — ZERO, ever.”
Not till that split second that law bidding gun owner pulled the trigger, as is usually the case with mass shooters
Yeah, that would have done it, NEXTMaybe the actual way to stop the Paddock type shootings is to fire those like Andrew McCabe?
Meaning what exactly, gumby? How does that relate to gun control laws that are geared to keep some of those (and future weapons) out of criminal and mental cranks hands?Well stupid, there is something like 500 million guns in the United States. You figure it out.
Yeah, that would have done it,
1. I asked you to copy and paste where I made a specific statement you accuse me off. Generally pointing at the OP and using a school yard reversal of my mocking of people of your mindset doesn't cut it.Post #1 gun grabber monkey.
Bullshit.
You gun grabber monkeys seek to "ban," that is outlaw the most common civilian rifle on the market.
The goal is to disarm the intended victims and particularly your political opposition.
The reason the Joe Biden police state in 2021 didn't "gel" is specifically because of 400 million firearms in the hands of the citizenry. Exactly as intended by the Founding Fathers with the 2nd Amendment.
The one where you claimed that "universal background checks" (which we already have) would stop mass shootings. Yet the Las Vegas superman who could fire three rifles simultaneously from three different locations was able to pass a background check without issue. Of course he could also carry 27 firearms through a crowded casino into a hotel room with no one noticing.
Hey gumby, wailing "gun grabbber" proves nothing. You have to FACTUALLY and LOGICALLY make your case. Let us know when you do.Will you be posting facts or truth anytime soon?
So far you've posted gun grabber monkey bullshit that has utterly nothing in common with reality.
And the latter happened when?
Yeah. They spring tiny sneakered feet and chase people around, just like a Warner Bros. cartoon.Is that a fact?????
What?And the latter happened when?![]()
And for every one they're convicted of you can bet your ass they committed at least 10 more. So when they whine about being innocent on the third strike you can be certain it's bullshit.How about a compromise?
How about a "three strikes" law that makes the third felony strike an automatic death sentence?