Gun Monkey Follies

1. If you can't copy and paste where I wrote such exactly as you accuse, then

Post #1 gun grabber monkey.

That's the point ... no one is advocating confiscation for legally purchased weapons.

Bullshit.

You gun grabber monkeys seek to "ban," that is outlaw the most common civilian rifle on the market.

The fight is to tighten up laws to make it harder for nutjobs and criminals to get quality weaponry.

The goal is to disarm the intended victims and particularly your political opposition.

The reason the Joe Biden police state in 2021 didn't "gel" is specifically because of 400 million firearms in the hands of the citizenry. Exactly as intended by the Founding Fathers with the 2nd Amendment.

The questions raised in the OP remain.

The one where you claimed that "universal background checks" (which we already have) would stop mass shootings. Yet the Las Vegas superman who could fire three rifles simultaneously from three different locations was able to pass a background check without issue. Of course he could also carry 27 firearms through a crowded casino into a hotel room with no one noticing.
 
Ohh, look the CCP troll is here to spread lies.

Number of "mass" shootings committed using weapons acquired from gun shows - ZERO, ever.

But keep lying - it's all you gun grabber monkeys do. So fuck off CCP Bot-Hole, this is none of your business.

🔍 Claim:

“Number of mass shootings committed using weapons acquired from gun shows — ZERO, ever.”

✅ Reality Check​

That statement is false.While the exact number is hard to quantify, multiple mass shootings have involved firearms obtained through private sales or gun shows, where background checks were not required under federal law.

📊 Key facts​

  • Gun show loophole: Federal law does not require background checks for private sellers at gun shows. This gap has been documented by the ATF and Congressional Research Service.
  • Examples contradicting the claim:
    • 1999 Columbine High School shooting: Two of the four guns used were purchased at a gun show through private sellers without background checks.
    • 2019 Odessa, Texas shooting: The shooter obtained his rifle via a private sale that bypassed a background check.
    • Other cases: ATF investigations have linked firearms used in crimes to gun show transactions, though not all qualify as “mass shootings.”
So “ZERO, ever” is demonstrably wrong — there have been multiple cases.


🧠 Context​

Gun shows themselves aren’t the root cause, but the private‑sale loophole they enable is a documented pathway for illegal or unchecked purchases.The claim ignores decades of evidence and federal reports showing that unregulated secondary markets contribute to gun trafficking and violent crime.
 
Not till that split second that law bidding gun owner pulled the trigger, as is usually the case with mass shooters

You're lying as usual. Paddock had illegally converted 9 of his firearms to fully automatic.

You have to give it to someone who can make 300 yard shots with a fully automatic weapon. One needs intense training to do that - special forces - or FBI training....
 
Post #1 gun grabber monkey.



Bullshit.

You gun grabber monkeys seek to "ban," that is outlaw the most common civilian rifle on the market.



The goal is to disarm the intended victims and particularly your political opposition.

The reason the Joe Biden police state in 2021 didn't "gel" is specifically because of 400 million firearms in the hands of the citizenry. Exactly as intended by the Founding Fathers with the 2nd Amendment.



The one where you claimed that "universal background checks" (which we already have) would stop mass shootings. Yet the Las Vegas superman who could fire three rifles simultaneously from three different locations was able to pass a background check without issue. Of course he could also carry 27 firearms through a crowded casino into a hotel room with no one noticing.
1. I asked you to copy and paste where I made a specific statement you accuse me off. Generally pointing at the OP and using a school yard reversal of my mocking of people of your mindset doesn't cut it.

2. Your opinions/accusations, generalized mis-characterizations are but a piss in the wind, as you seek to dodge the facts and subsequent questions that the OP puts forth.

3. Again, private sales are not regulated in a lot of states. Also, waiting periods an ID requirements vary. This contributes to the "iron pipeline" of criminals using wrapons. Your final example proves my point. If the 1994 AWB was in effect, the Vegas shooter would not of had many of his weapons.

So you can repeat your ignorant BS ad nausea, yet you cannot produce the law or proposal that pushed for mass confiscation or repeal of the 2nd Amendment. Carry on.
 
How about a compromise?

How about a "three strikes" law that makes the third felony strike an automatic death sentence?
And for every one they're convicted of you can bet your ass they committed at least 10 more. So when they whine about being innocent on the third strike you can be certain it's bullshit.



And execute them in the public square with tickets to blow parts off their bodies with "Assault weapons" like a dunk tank at the state fair.



Get medieval on their ass and make crime stop. Before you know it you'll run out of the 5% committing most of the crime and the world will be a better place.
 
Back
Top