Guns

[Into the Night]

Those would be illegal guns and if someone is buy them illegally, then why go across a State line.

Smuggling is an old and established kind of work.

Someone can walk into a gun store, in another State; but if you can't prove residency in that State, then they're not going to let you walk out with anything and you'll have to arrange to have them shipped to a store in your State.

Who said anything about a gun store? Who said anything about restricting it to crossing just a State line?

But the whiners weren't talking about illegal transactions; because they were referencing buying them from a legal dealer.

What is a 'legal' dealer?

What in the Constitution of the United States gives the federal government power to declare what gun dealer is 'legal' or not?
Isn't that giving the federal government the power to declare any manufacturer, dealer, or any other merchant 'illegal' simply by an arbitrary scale that is popular at the time? Isn't that building an oligarchy that has this tremendous power?

In other words, just what in the Constitution gives Congress the authority to create the BATF?

 

[/MSG/]

Irrelevant to gun deaths, dumbfuck. Just diversionary bullshit.

No, it isn't, you just don't understand the question.

 

[Into the Night]

Just diversionary bullshit.

I agree. You are evading. Answer his question.

 

[domer76]

No, it isn't, you just don't understand the question.

Nope, sure do, dumbfuck. You’re just trying to divert from the facts. 40,000 gun deaths last year. Simply because guns are so easily available. Such willful ignorance on your part.

 

[domer76]

I agree. You are evading. Answer his question.

Not a bit. You sad fucking barrel strokers have no defense for 40,000 guns deaths. So you cherry pick, lie and divert.

 

[/MSG/]

Not a bit. You sad fucking barrel strokers have no defense for 40,000 guns deaths. So you cherry pick, lie and divert.

Do you support an individuals agency to their own body? Yes or no?

 

[/MSG/]

Not a bit. You sad fucking barrel strokers have no defense for 40,000 guns deaths. So you cherry pick, lie and divert.

Do you support black people owning guns? Yes or no?

 

[domer76]

Do you support an individuals agency to their own body? Yes or no?

Irrelevant, dumbfuck.

40,000 deaths a year.

Quit trying to divert. It’s pathetic.

 

[domer76]

Do you support black people owning guns? Yes or no?

Another lame diversionary tactic.

Try to address the issue, dumbfuck. 40,000 gun deaths a year.

 

[/MSG/]

Irrelevant, dumbfuck.

40,000 deaths a year.

Quit trying to divert. It’s pathetic.

Do you support an individuals agency to their own body? Yes or no?

 

[/MSG/]

Another lame diversionary tactic.

Try to address the issue, dumbfuck. 40,000 gun deaths a year.

Do you support black people owning guns? Yes or no?

 

[Into the Night]

Nope, sure do, dumbfuck. You’re just trying to divert from the facts. 40,000 gun deaths last year. Simply because guns are so easily available. Such willful ignorance on your part.

You are evading. Answer his question.

 

[Into the Night]

Not a bit. You sad fucking barrel strokers have no defense for 40,000 guns deaths. So you cherry pick, lie and divert.

Inversion fallacy. Cherry picking fallacy. Argument from randU fallacy. Compositional error fallacy.

 

[Into the Night]

Irrelevant, dumbfuck.

40,000 deaths a year.

Quit trying to divert. It’s pathetic.

Evading. Answer his questions.

....unless of course you don't know the meaning of 'yes' or 'no'.

 

[Into the Night]

Another lame diversionary tactic.

Try to address the issue, dumbfuck. 40,000 gun deaths a year.

Inversion fallacy. YOU are evading. Answer his questions.

 

[domer76]

Inversion fallacy. Cherry picking fallacy. Argument from randU fallacy. Compositional error fallacy.

I don’t cherry pick, dumbfuck. You lightweights try to separate out and categorize the gun deaths. I merely point out the total.

Fucking liars

 

[domer76]

Evading. Answer his questions.

....unless of course you don't know the meaning of 'yes' or 'no'.

Irrelevant question to divert from the topic at hand, dumbfuck.

 

[domer76]

Inversion fallacy. YOU are evading. Answer his questions.

Irrelevant question to divert from the subject at hand. Diversionary bullshit. Barrel strokers are good at that.

 

[USFREEDOM911]

You don’t get out much, do you, stupid fuck? Public transportation is not available everywhere.

That's because there's to many damn cars in the way.

Get rid of them and move transportation forward.

 

[USFREEDOM911]

Typical non-answer.

No a typical non-answer would be what you keep replying with.