HAHAHA. Bug-eyed freak Adam Schiff says the GREAT WHISTLEBLOWER will not testify

Text Drivers are Killers

Joe Biden - "Time to put Trump in the bullseye."
Said on Meet the Press that having him testify would only "gratify the president’s desire for retribution.”

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/20...-the-presidents-desire-for-retribution-video/

nov 24 2019
"We had a deep interest in having the whistleblower testify until two things happened. One, we were able to prove everything the whistleblower complaint with witnesses that had first -hand information. And second, the president and his allies effectively put that whistleblower’s life in danger. The president said the whistleblower and others should be treated as a traitor or a spy and we ought to use the penalty we used to use for traitors and spies and that’s the death penalty. So here’s the thing, Chuck, we don’t need the whistleblower’s second-hand information anymore. It would only serve to endanger this person and to gratify the president’s desire for retribution.”
 
Good. trump said people were "un-American and treasonous" when they didn't applaud him at the SOTU. I can just imagine what he'd like to do to the WB.
 
Schiffs control ends at the Senate -the WB will testify, and we'll end this charade
"gratify the president’s desire for retribution.”
^what a pathetic weirdo says this crap
 
Said on Meet the Press that having him testify would only "gratify the president’s desire for retribution.”

How can a person that shall not be named testify in anything? For him to present his story he'd likely have to expose his identity. You and many others seem too stupid to understand why whistleblowers and informants remain anonymous.

Let's take a political forum for example of anonymity and make something maybe even you can get. If someone like you had to use their real info to a letter (full name, address.) they would never act like you do online Are you capable of answering why?
 
How can a person that shall not be named testify in anything? For him to present his story he'd likely have to expose his identity. You and many others seem too stupid to understand why whistleblowers and informants remain anonymous.

Hey einstein. The name of the WB has already been exposed so there is no good reason for him not to testify. Truth is he just doesn't have anything. THINK
 
Hey einstein. The name of the WB has already been exposed so there is no good reason for him not to testify. Truth is he just doesn't have anything. THINK

It hasn't, you dolt. Now get your head out of your ass. Using conspiracy to come up with who it is means you might as well put Nessie down as the whistleblower.
 
Schiff knew that everything the whistleblower said was backed by the witnesses for the last 2 weeks. He does not have to show up so Trump can wreck his life. His statements were proven. There is no reason he has to be destroyed by rightys for doing his duty. It may endanger his life and would cost him his job. You vindictive rightys just want a shot at him. Try dealing with the facts that he gave the IG and were attested to repeatedly.
 
Mark Levin: “Not a single Inquiry Witness had EVIDENCE of bribery, extortion or crime.”
 
How can a person that shall not be named testify in anything? For him to present his story he'd likely have to expose his identity. You and many others seem too stupid to understand why whistleblowers and informants remain anonymous.

Let's take a political forum for example of anonymity and make something maybe even you can get. If someone like you had to use their real info to a letter (full name, address.) they would never act like you do online Are you capable of answering why?

The whistleblower protection act says nothing about protecting anonymity. Anywhere.
 
Mark Levin: “Not a single Inquiry Witness had EVIDENCE of bribery, extortion or crime.”

Well, that settles it, a radio demogogue said there is nothing there, now did he offer proof, but was it just another rant full of generalizations and inneundo?

The sad part is the likes of "earl" believes everything these people say, regardless, I swear if one of these demogogues told Trumpkins that the globe was square they'd believe them, there is a reason they made themselves millionaires telling the willing what they wanted to hear
 
The whistleblower protection act says nothing about protecting anonymity. Anywhere.

So if such was the case why hasn't Trump with his army of attorneys sued in one of his Courts to get the person's name?

If he was so concerned over the whistleblower being anonymous, what is he waiting for, bowling ball billy barr will be happy to do it, Trump told America the guy was a "traitor," so why isn't Donny doing what he can, he certainly doesn't hold back when it is anything concerning his finances, and now he thinks this person betrayed the US, so,why is he waiting?

Trump don't give a rat's ass about the whistleblower being anonymous, as is usually the case, he is just using his bitching as a deflection, a distraction, Trump's only concern is that he is missing out on another scapegoat
 
The whistleblower protection act says nothing about protecting anonymity. Anywhere.

That's the entire point of whistleblower and witness protection. When things get compromised for those that testify they often have to move into protected custody and assume new identities. The Trump cultists need to grow the heck up and use what brain they have left. The safety is there because people won't come forward if they think they or even someone they love could be targeted over their witness testimony. The fact they think it shouldn't follow logic now that it involves powers that could really turn their lives inside out is astounding to every synapse in my mind. Trump doesn't get shit and neither does his impudent followers.
 
Back
Top