HAHAHA. Bug-eyed freak Adam Schiff says the GREAT WHISTLEBLOWER will not testify

[archives]

So the Clown Show is a complete waste of time and taxpayer money. Thank you for clarifying that.

2020 is going to be a disaster for the Democratic Party of the Jackass. Alas, you talk with a lot of huff, but very little puff. Take the bet! https://www.justplainpolitics.com/s...berals-are-strongly-encouraged-to-participate

Got to love it when a trumpkin is now worried about "time and money" of investigations, for twelve years the GOP did little other than "investigate," often, redundant "investigations" into the same thing, but now the cost of investigations is relevant, nothing like exposing one's hypocrisy

And the bet thing is almost as humorous, as I've said before, if Trump loses "truthie" as a title will no longer exist, he will be exiting quicker than a hot knife thru butter, but now he wants to book the election, as I say, always entertaining

 

[Truth Detector]

Meaning you got nothing, shocking

Wrong again; meaning YOU got nothing assflake.

 

[archives]

because a bunch of beta democrats would cry about witness intimidation you retard. trump couldn't even tweet about Hill without you guys crying about it.

Not buying that one, nobody or nothing has ever stopped Trump from tweeting, especially personal attacks, and now you are telling us Trump won't tweet the guy's name, who he thinks is a "traitor" to the United States, because he is worried about the Democrats' reaction?

Got to do better than that

 

[Truth Detector]

Got to love it when a trumpkin is now worried about "time and money" of investigations, for twelve years the GOP did little other than "investigate," often, redundant "investigations" into the same thing, but now the cost of investigations is relevant, nothing like exposing one's hypocrisy

Benghazi wasn't about nothing. Fast and Furious wasn't about nothing. Clinton banging interns, obstruction and lying under oath wasn't about nothing.

This clown show; this is nothing BUT nothing. Only low IQ idiots think it is something. Much like the Mueller HOAX which the idiot Schiff is now trying to resurrect. It doesn't get much dumber than that.

And the bet thing is almost as humorous, as I've said before, if Trump loses "truthie" as a title will no longer exist, he will be exiting quicker than a hot knife thru butter, but now he wants to book the election, as I say, always entertaining

There you go with the whiny dishonest strawmen. I have been here since March 2011 you whiny putz. How long have you been crying and lying here? Three years?

 

[Sailor]

That's the entire point of whistleblower and witness protection. When things get compromised for those that testify they often have to move into protected custody and assume new identities. The Trump cultists need to grow the heck up and use what brain they have left. The safety is there because people won't come forward if they think they or even someone they love could be targeted over their witness testimony. The fact they think it shouldn't follow logic now that it involves powers that could really turn their lives inside out is astounding to every synapse in my mind. Trump doesn't get shit and neither does his impudent followers.

No. Try reading the Whistleblower Protection Act. Seems every liberal on this board that likes to comment on it have not read it.

 

[archives]

Wrong again; meaning YOU got nothing assflake.

And you can't even be original, "you got nothing," "I know you are, but what am I," spoken like a real teenage girl with her hand on her hip

 

[Truth Detector]

Not buying that one, nobody or nothing has ever stopped Trump from tweeting, especially personal attacks, and now you are telling us Trump won't tweet the guy's name, who he thinks is a "traitor" to the United States, because he is worried about the Democrats' reaction?

Got to do better than that

Nothing has stopped Trump from hurting the feelings of whiny little asswhipes. But again, he can't do a damned thing to the ANONYMOUS FAKE WHISTLE BLOWER and NO, ANONYMOUS FAKE WHISTLE BLOWER don't get to hurl their hearsay innuendo in anonymity either.

Grow a brain.

 

[Truth Detector]

No. Try reading the Whistleblower Protection Act. Seems every liberal on this board that likes to comment on it have not read it.

That would require effort and honesty. Leftist liars have none and hate to use effort to do anything.

 

[archives]

No. Try reading the Whistleblower Protection Act. Seems every liberal on this board that likes to comment on it have not read it.

So then you tells us there "sailor," if the whistleblower protection act doesn't protect the identity of the whistleblower, and as your comrades above have said everyone knows who the whistleblower is, why hasn't Trump dropped the guy's name? If he thinks the guy is a "traitor" to the United States shouldn't he expose his identity? He cries about the guy endlessly, playing the martyr, so what is holding him back?

 

[Truth Detector]

And you can't even be original, "you got nothing," "I know you are, but what am I," spoken like a real teenage girl with her hand on her hip

Poor Arsecheese; he's stupid, lies and cries a lot.

After 2020.

 

[Truth Detector]

So then you tells us there "sailor," if the whistleblower protection act doesn't protect the identity of the whistleblower, and as your comrades above have said everyone knows who the whistleblower is, why hasn't Trump dropped the guy's name? If he thinks the guy is a "traitor" to the United States shouldn't he expose his identity? He cries about the guy endlessly, playing the martyr, so what is holding him back?

His name has already been exposed you dumb hack.

 

[Sailor]

So then you tells us there "sailor," if the whistleblower protection act doesn't protect the identity of the whistleblower, and as your comrades above have said everyone knows who the whistleblower is, why hasn't Trump dropped the guy's name? If he thinks the guy is a "traitor" to the United States shouldn't he expose his identity? He cries about the guy endlessly, playing the martyr, so what is holding him back?

How about you, and the rest of you lazy ass uneducated liberals, take the time to look it up? Guess what "Archives", it is more than a tweet or a 5 second sound byte. Your attention spans probably will not be able to handle it.

 

[archives]

Nothing has stopped Trump from hurting the feelings of whiny little asswhipes. But again, he can't do a damned thing to the ANONYMOUS FAKE WHISTLE BLOWER and NO, ANONYMOUS FAKE WHISTLE BLOWER don't get to hurl their hearsay innuendo in anonymity either.

Grow a brain.

Why? Why can't he do a "damn thing to the anonymous fake whistle blower?"

You and your comrades above said everybody knows who the individual is, and again, that the law says he isn't entitled to remain anonymous, so why hasn't Donny tweeted a personal attack on him? He told America the guy is a "traitor" to America, it should be his duty to identify a "traitor," shouldn't he be anxious to drop the dime? What is holding him back?

 

[archives]

How about you, and the rest of you lazy ass uneducated liberals, take the time to look it up? Guess what "Archives", it is more than a tweet or a 5 second sound byte. Your attention spans probably will not be able to handle it.

You didn't answer the question

You tells us the law doesn't prevent the whistleblower's identity from being exposed, but you can't tell us what is holding Trump back. Trump cries about the guy endlessly, but does nothing. Why?

 

[archives]

His name has already been exposed you dumb hack.

Does everything sail right over "truthie's" head?

Already been "exposed," but Trump is still crying about the whistleblower being anonymous, so, why hasn't Trump launched one of his famous personal attacks against the guy rather than just bitching about his being anonymous? You told us his anonymity isn't covered by the law, so again, actually the third time, why isn't Trump publicly exposing a "traitor" to America?

 

[Truth Detector]

Why? Why can't he do a "damn thing to the anonymous fake whistle blower?"

What can Trump do to him? Make him cry?

You and your comrades above said everybody knows who the individual is, and again, that the law says he isn't entitled to remain anonymous, so why hasn't Donny tweeted a personal attack on him? He told America the guy is a "traitor" to America, it should be his duty to identify a "traitor," shouldn't he be anxious to drop the dime? What is holding him back?

I guess the reason Trump hasn't is because he wants to make you look like the dishonest whiny little buffoon we all know you to be.

The ANONYMOUS FAKE WHISTLE BLOWER's name has been exposed you dimwitted wonder dunce.

 

[Sailor]

You didn't answer the question

You tells us the law doesn't prevent the whistleblower's identity from being exposed, but you can't tell us what is holding Trump back. Trump cries about the guy endlessly, but does nothing. Why?

Sure I did. Look it up. As far as Trump I cannot answer for him. It is not like the WB's identity and partisan background are not already known. Probably from the Democrats. They did the same thing to Ford when they promised they would not.

 

[archives]

Poor Arsecheese; he's stupid, lies and cries a lot.

And not only lacking ingenuity, you still got to resort to the corny copy and pastes, too easy, but always a treat

 

[archives]

Sure I did. Look it up. As far as Trump I cannot answer for him. It is not like the WB's identity and partisan background are not already known. Probably from the Democrats. They did the same thing to Ford when they promised they would not.

Next

 

[Truth Detector]

Does everything sail right over "truthie's" head?

IRONY.

Already been "exposed," but Trump is still crying about the whistleblower being anonymous, so, why hasn't Trump launched one of his famous personal attacks against the guy rather than just bitching about his being anonymous? You told us his anonymity isn't covered by the law, so again, actually the third time, why isn't Trump publicly exposing a "traitor" to America?

Schiff is claiming he doesn't know the ANONYMOUS FAKE WHISTLE BLOWERS name. Why is Schiff just lying about his being anonymous? Anonymity isn't covered by the law, so again, actually the third time, why isn't Schiff publicly admitting he is shielding a "traitor" to America?

Moron.