HAHAHA. Bug-eyed freak Adam Schiff says the GREAT WHISTLEBLOWER will not testify

Sure I did. Look it up. As far as Trump I cannot answer for him. It is not like the WB's identity and partisan background are not already known. Probably from the Democrats. They did the same thing to Ford when they promised they would not.

You have to wonder about the intelligence of these WBs who try to bring down a president or a SC nominee and think their name will NOT be exposed. Leakers are everywhere.
 
As soon as you tell a liberal to look up something or prove something, they get a glazed over look in their eyes and hope it will go away.

But it's the reps that are needing to prove something in this discussion. I don't really have to say or do anything until there's at least a lick of actual evidence presented.
 
watch how i'll be right and you'll be proven to have been in the dark and as always people like you will just chalk it up to "coincidence" and being "lucky"

this is fairly well known information. it's not a secret. get out of your echo chamber.

No one acts without evidence even if it ends up being true. That's only something a complete airhead would do. I don't have an echo chamber I just don't listen to others and theirs. Proof or nothing, it's that simple. Sensationalism doesn't impress me no matter where it's coming from. Thinking you got the scoop doesn't impress either. Takes a real bastard to brag about believing they've exposed a witness from the safety of anonymity. It tells me all I need to know about what's being tossed around. Speaking of that, you still haven't even attempted to provide info yet despite saying you're in the know.
 
But it's the reps that are needing to prove something in this discussion. I don't really have to say or do anything until there's at least a lick of actual evidence presented.

Isn't that what we've been trying to tell you, hearsay is just that, hearsay?
I could say you're smart, but until it's proven, it's just hearsay, right?
 
But it's the reps that are needing to prove something in this discussion. I don't really have to say or do anything until there's at least a lick of actual evidence presented.

Nobody is trying to prove anything here. Just facts. The Whistleblower Protection Act says nothing about protecting anonymity.
 
As soon as you tell a liberal to look up something or prove something, they get a glazed over look in their eyes and hope it will go away.

As soon as you tell a liberal to look up something or prove something, they......

stickman+running+3.gif
 
Isn't that what we've been trying to tell you, hearsay is just that, hearsay?
I could say you're smart, but until it's proven, it's just hearsay, right?

Yeah hearsay is bad but even eyewitness testimony is worthless esp in a case like this. All the anti-trump speakers at the impeachment hearings were paid by the DNC. You can buy off most people with a $12 pizza.
 
Back
Top