Saint Guinefort
Verified User
Yes. And she is still an idiot.
Ah, so it isn't a debate about ART, but rather your dislike of what she says. Got it.
That's cool. Everyone has different tastes.
Yes. And she is still an idiot.
Ah, so it isn't a debate about ART, but rather your dislike of what she says.
Ah, so it isn't a debate about ART, but rather your dislike of what she says. Got it.
That's cool. Everyone has different tastes.
You did not get it. It is a debate about art and her comments.
Next to the etching on paper “Sculptor and Model Looking at Herself, 1933,” the comic writes: “Alternative title: ‘If I angle the mirror to reflect the sun, I can burn your face off. Look at my penis.’”
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/06/09/arts/design/hannah-gadsby-picasso-brooklyn-museum-debate.html
A stupid and juvenile comment by Gadsby.
Her comments are both a critique of the man but more importantly a critique of the art as an outgrowth of the man who made it.
She, herself, is an artist. She is doing what the modern artists like Picasso did: upsetting the apple cart of the old art. This is iconoclasm.
She, Gadsby, is a comedian. Her comment was incredibly stupid and childish.
Clearly you dislike her artform. She is taking a page out of art history. She is challenging the art you love and using it to make art of her own. You love the old stuff, she is making new stuff. Just as Picasso's art was attacked by his critics in the early 20th century as being from "diseased nerves" and "degenerate". (See HERE)
So, it's OK if you dislike her art. You are not alone in the history of art.
Clearly you dislike her artform. She is taking a page out of art history. She is challenging the art you love and using it to make art of her own. You love the old stuff, she is making new stuff. Just as Picasso's art was attacked by his critics in the early 20th century as being from "diseased nerves" and "degenerate". (See HERE)
So, it's OK if you dislike her art. You are not alone in the history of art.
Her artform is comedy. I kind of lost your point.
Hard to understand your comments. You seem to know nothing about Gadsby or Picasso.
I never said she has no right to comment. I said her comments are inane and childish.
She is an artist. She is breaking the old art to make new art. You don't like it. Clearly. You use much of the same language that was used about Picasso when he first drifted over into Cubism.
You are continuing a tradition of disliking new art in preference the old art you are familiar with and which you love.
EVERYONE does that.
You don't need to insult me.
You don't need to insult me.
I never heard of anyone calling a comedian an artist. Fine if you want to do that, but it is eccentric.
It is an art. Especially how she does it. You should watch one of her specials. She is gifted. And, yes, it is an art. Just as acting is an art. Just as poetry is an art.
Well, you keep ignoring actual quotes of Gadsby and refuse to discuss the exhibit.
Well, you keep ignoring actual quotes of Gadsby and refuse to discuss the exhibit.
“Humans are not doing great,” they say on the audio guide. “We are unsettled. I blame Picasso. That’s a little joke. Or is it? I don’t know.”
https://www.artnews.com/art-news/re...ablo-matic-brooklyn-museum-review-1234670115/
What the hell is that supposed to mean?!
You speak in exactly the same tones as those who hated on Picasso when he expanded his art.