I think you meant he was arguably the greatest American of last century. I certainly don't want to dispute that King was an influential and important person in history, as I stated, he delivered one of the most poignant messages of the century. In regards to "greatness", that is a highly subjective term, and depends largely on what is viewed as "great" by the individual. King might be the "greatest" non-president to you, but what does that mean? Is he greater than Einstein? Is he greater than Oppenheimer? Is he greater than Von Braun? Is he greater than Elvis? Is he greater than Art Linkletter or Billy Graham?
A lot of people have made unsurpassed contributions to America, and could be considered just as "great" as MLK. It was this argument, which was the basis for dissent, regarding the King holiday. It's not a racist view, it's a pragmatic view. Were Kings accomplishments deserving of a national holiday, when so many others have been forgotten or overlooked? Clearly, the issue was voted on and settled, and Congress found that King's contributions indeed warranted a special national holiday.
It's patently unfair and intellectually dishonest, to now categorize this opposition as "racist" because you disagree with it. The record shows, race was not the issue with the King holiday.
I never claimed it was racist. BEing against MLK day, could be for racist or non racist reasons... Id have to hear the reasons.
You are correct, the last century if you are going by the calendar, if you are saying of the last 100 years, then its of this century...