Dixie - In Memoriam
New member
Do you think southerners who were against an MLK holiday are going to openly admit it was for racist reasons? Or, will they hide behind other lame reasons?
I've already addressed this question from Idiot #1. No, I don't think Southerners who were against MLK holiday for racist reasons, are going to admit it was for racist reasons. I also don't think people who seek the presidency for power, are going to admit they seek the presidency for power. Bigots don't often admit they are bigoted. There are any number of sentiments and motives that people may keep hidden from public view, for any number of reasons, and we simply have no scientific way of proving their intentions or motives.
This is an invalid way to determine racism, in my opinion. In essence, you are claiming, because people didn't say they are racist, they obviously must be. For this very reason, we have developed many various criteria to judge if a person is truly racist. Do they truly feel blacks are inferior to whites, or whites are superior to blacks? If their statements lead to this conclusion, chances are, they are racist in their views.
Your method is based on bigoted stereotypes you have already established in your bigot mind, and relies on your personal perception, to determine if something is "racist". In other words, someone is "racist" because they opposed a national federal holiday for a black man. When the truth is, the arguments made in opposition to MLK Day, could have been (and were)legitimately articulated regardless of King's race.
I've already addressed this question from Idiot #1. No, I don't think Southerners who were against MLK holiday for racist reasons, are going to admit it was for racist reasons. I also don't think people who seek the presidency for power, are going to admit they seek the presidency for power. Bigots don't often admit they are bigoted. There are any number of sentiments and motives that people may keep hidden from public view, for any number of reasons, and we simply have no scientific way of proving their intentions or motives.
This is an invalid way to determine racism, in my opinion. In essence, you are claiming, because people didn't say they are racist, they obviously must be. For this very reason, we have developed many various criteria to judge if a person is truly racist. Do they truly feel blacks are inferior to whites, or whites are superior to blacks? If their statements lead to this conclusion, chances are, they are racist in their views.
Your method is based on bigoted stereotypes you have already established in your bigot mind, and relies on your personal perception, to determine if something is "racist". In other words, someone is "racist" because they opposed a national federal holiday for a black man. When the truth is, the arguments made in opposition to MLK Day, could have been (and were)legitimately articulated regardless of King's race.