Purely emotional, you do not like that I am arguing for Constitutional limits on presidential power. You have no valid argument.Indeed…you are posting to one of the most uninformed posters and illiterate posters on this forum.
Lots of luck.
Purely emotional, you do not like that I am arguing for Constitutional limits on presidential power. You have no valid argument.Indeed…you are posting to one of the most uninformed posters and illiterate posters on this forum.
Lots of luck.
Ok I'll play along. Since you can't tell me why a group with $52 BILLION should get money from hard working American taxpayers, explain how not having taxpayer money prevents Harvard or any school from saying or doing whatever they fuck it please. I'm asking for a friend.That would be a good discussion, I suspect, without studying it, that some funding is valid and used for legitimate purposes that benefit the Nation as a whole, and that some is not legit. That is something for Congress to consider.
The issue I was discussing here is the stated reason of the Administration and the clear objectives of the Administration which is to suppress speech that they do not like.
Post a link proving that President Trump’s stated reason is because he does not like them allowing speech he disagrees with.The Felon's stated reason is because he does not like them allowing speech he disagrees with.
Congress appropriated the funding, that discussion is appropriate at that level.
True. He does claim to be a lawyer so ...Indeed…you are posting to one of the most uninformed posters and illiterate posters on this forum.
Lots of luck.
The president has the authority to remove financial support to a university that discriminates due to religion and violates the Civil Rights Law.Purely emotional, you do not like that I am arguing for Constitutional limits on presidential power. You have no valid argument.
That is the Presidents stated goal and why he is doing it, ask him.explain how not having taxpayer money prevents Harvard or any school from saying or doing whatever they fuck it please. I'm asking for a friend.
It is unconstitutional for a university to use government money to discriminate due to religion. That is the reason for the difference.The president has the authority to remove financial support to a university that discriminates due to religion and violates the Civil Rights Law.
I have already proven that you are functionally illiterate ant grossly uninformed.
No I'm asking you because you're defending Harvards getting taxpayer money and claiming their free speech will be surpressed if the funding is eliminated. AGAIN like everything else you post you can't explain why. Either give the explanation or stop bothering the adults.That is the Presidents stated goal and why he is doing it, ask him.
You just proved my point, he opposes the message people are being allowed to express at Harvard. He opposes them allowing free speech and thus he is taking away government money because it his opposition to it.Post a link proving that President Trump’s stated reason is because he does not like them allowing speech he disagrees with.
He has said that he opposes the violent anti-semitism being allowed and encouraged by Harvard.
You have no clue as to what is happening at Harvard, right?
Did you know that they have many Chinese students who are Communist spies?
Spend a few bucks on an English Grammar book and study the chapter on sentence structure…syntax.It is unconstitutional for a university to use government money to discriminate due to religion. That is the reason for the difference.
Attack the form of the message, because you cant defend your position against the message. I understand.Spend a few bucks on an English Grammar book and study the chapter on sentence structure…syntax.
there is an evil society that overtops everything and cause people to do evil by force.The Universities became a force for Evil.....they chose to do that.
Students who are screaming Hamas’ slogan “death to America” are violating the law…support for terrorism is a no no.You just proved my point, he opposes the message people are being allowed to express at Harvard. He opposes them allowing free speech and thus he is taking away government money because it his opposition to it.
AGAIN for the 900th fucking time how does taking funding away from Harvard prevent them from allowing hatred on their campus disguised as free speech?You just proved my point, he opposes the message people are being allowed to express at Harvard. He opposes them allowing free speech and thus he is taking away government money because it his opposition to it.
No, you still don’t understand that you dilute your argument when you use the wrong words…”principal” instead of principle and sentence structure that is at the sixth grade level.Attack the form of the message, because you cant defend your position against the message. I understand.
And by allowing it har ard is supporting terrorism.Students who are screaming Hamas’ slogan “ death to America” are violating the law…support for terrorism is a no no.
I really have not. But Neo Nazis like yourself see all sorts of conspiracies that Jews do not.You have seen the riots by students who support a terrorist organization on Harvard’s campuses.
They are allowed and Harvard’s staff attends these riots.
It is constitutionally protected speech, even if you do not like it.Students who are screaming Hamas’ slogan “death to America” are violating the law…support for terrorism is a no no.
One hundred percent.And by allowing it har ard is supporting terrorism.
you know who's most anti-semitic?Yes it is terrible. The population is 3 percent Jewish. Undergrads at Harvard are 10 percent Jewish. The grad share is 53 percent Jewish. That is so unfair to Jews.