Has Trump become the new O.J.?

T

Tacomaman

Verified User
There is recent polling out there that indicates this may well be the case. Even after his acquittal, most Americans had a negative opinion of Simpson. They saw his acquittal as nothing more than what a celebrity can get away with by using a cadre of high profile attorneys.
Instead of having a positive post - impeachment impression of Trump, it appears that a majority of Americans feel that Trump was indeed guilty (although not rising to the level of removal from office) and that McConnell's quasi trial was just a coverup. How accurate this assessment is will be proven in November.
 
Only people who watch fox think the Impeachments end was correct



Fake news created his base


Just Like that idiot republican said recently "If Fox existed back then Nixon would never have been Impeached"
 
I will give Trump credit. He did an outstanding job of "conditioning" his supporters way before the election with his "Its a rigged system" rants.
 
evince said:
Only people who watch fox think the Impeachments end was correct



Fake news created his base


Just Like that idiot republican said recently "If Fox existed back then Nixon would never have been Impeached"
Click to expand...

People that know the Constitution know the end was correct.
 
Tacomaman said:
I will give Trump credit. He did an outstanding job of "conditioning" his supporters way before the election with his "Its a rigged system" rants.
Click to expand...

After the election, it's you lefties that have lived the "it's a rigged system" life.

304 - 227. The cunt got her ass kicked and you lefties can't take it like adults.
 
Tacomaman said:
There is recent polling out there that indicates this may well be the case. Even after his acquittal, most Americans had a negative opinion of Simpson. They saw his acquittal as nothing more than what a celebrity can get away with by using a cadre of high profile attorneys.
Instead of having a positive post - impeachment impression of Trump, it appears that a majority of Americans feel that Trump was indeed guilty (although not rising to the level of removal from office) and that McConnell's quasi trial was just a coverup. How accurate this assessment is will be proven in November.
Click to expand...

November is not going to be a good month for you. ;)
 
Tacomaman said:
I will give Trump credit. He did an outstanding job of "conditioning" his supporters way before the election with his "Its a rigged system" rants.
Click to expand...

No one needed to condition the Trump supporters. The Republicans were well conditioned with Racism, Abuse of Power, Self-Interest, Corruption, Xenophobia, Homophobia, Misogyny, Lies, Fake News, Conspiracy Theories, Hatred for others, bigotry, and White Nationalism before Donald Trump reigned in on their hatred to become their "Messenger of Hate" for them.

Trump%20rally%20racism-768x403.jpg


58005d3a1a00006e145b969f.jpeg


trump-supporters.png


17confederate1-superJumbo.jpg
 
Adolf_Twitler said:
No one needed to condition the Trump supporters. The Republicans were well conditioned with Racism, Abuse of Power, Self-Interest, Corruption, Xenophobia, Homophobia, Misogyny, Lies, Fake News, Conspiracy Theories, Hatred for others, bigotry, and White Nationalism before Donald Trump reigned in on their hatred to become their "Messenger of Hate" for them.
Click to expand...

You give new meaning to the word MORON every damned day. :rolleyes:
 
Tranquillus in Exile said:
Does the Constitution say that the accused can order witnesses not to testify, provided they work or have worked for him?
Click to expand...

Accused? What crime was Trump accused of? If they were actually witnesses and Trump ordered them not to testify, wouldn't the House include obstruction of Justice in the articles?

You leftists are such gullible dupes. You'd gobble up anything the PHONY media feeds you. :laugh:
 
Tranquillus in Exile said:
Does the Constitution say that the accused can order witnesses not to testify, provided they work or have worked for him?
Click to expand...

The Constitution says nothing either way for or against.

What the Constitution does say is that the Senate conducts a trial and it takes a 2/3 vote to remove from office.
 
Tacomaman said:
There is recent polling out there that indicates this may well be the case. Even after his acquittal, most Americans had a negative opinion of Simpson. They saw his acquittal as nothing more than what a celebrity can get away with by using a cadre of high profile attorneys.
Instead of having a positive post - impeachment impression of Trump, it appears that a majority of Americans feel that Trump was indeed guilty (although not rising to the level of removal from office) and that McConnell's quasi trial was just a coverup. How accurate this assessment is will be proven in November.
Click to expand...

Certainly some similarities there. Like OJ, Trump was found innocent in a sham trial and most Americans still believe he's guilty.
 
cawacko said:
Why was the OJ trial a sham?
Click to expand...

So the trial was before my time, but based on what I've seen from documentaries, it seems like OJ's team did everything they could to shift the focus onto a racist cop and this actually worked. Instead of OJ being on trial, it ended up being about this cop. Republicans actually tried the same thing by shifting focus to Hunter Biden and the Democrats.
Of course, there are still differences. We don't know if the jury in the OJ trial was biased, whereas with Trump, a few of the Republicans openly admitted they didn't care about evidence.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top