Here's what the problem with money is

Generally explained…
Imagine you do the same thing with the same amount of money twice from its beginning until its end , but one of the times that it takes you more time and effort.

Would you choose again and again to do it when it takes you more time and effort to do it with the same amount of money, doing the same thing?


try thinking about it, or try another thread, and spending time and effort on my thread that you don't understand...cause what is it that you don't understand player?

Try English. Void questions.
 
Nope. Capitalism does NOT require the use of money at all.

No doubt you use your marble collection in place of money.

67hwmv.gif
 
Try English. Void questions.

Try replying idiot, or get lost.
See, and yet even you idiot, who keep replying to my thread while you don't understand, understand that, idiot...

get it idiot?
Now reply or get lost.


Generally explained…
Imagine you do the same thing with the same amount of money twice from its beginning until its end , but one of the times that it takes you more time and effort.

Would you choose again and again to do it when it takes you more time and effort to do it with the same amount of money, doing the same thing?


try thinking about it, or try another thread, and spending time and effort on my thread that you don't understand...cause what is it that you don't understand player?
 
Same goes for the rest of you clowns,

read the text and respond to the text,

if you geniuses think you have arguments.

Otherwise geniuses, if you want to write your opinions/conclusions without arguments...

...make your own thread geniuses, and let's see how many people want to read your opinions...

Get that players?

Now reply or get lost. Why? Cause...

...MAMA in the end puts order.
 
In my opinion, the Richest should insist Commerce is customarily and by habit more "humanitarian", and that if they have to get Richer they would be prefer to do it by peaceful means.

The belligerent parties should cease and desist so we can start making more money rebuilding your economies.

Under Capitalism, it is what the Richest can Always be Good for merely because charity can cover multitudes of sins under deism and secular ethics.
 
Capitalism is not capital.

Try replying idiot, or get lost.
See, and yet even you idiot, who keep replying to my thread while you don't understand, understand that, idiot...

get it idiot?
Now reply or get lost.


Generally explained…
Imagine you do the same thing with the same amount of money twice from its beginning until its end , but one of the times that it takes you more time and effort.

Would you choose again and again to do it when it takes you more time and effort to do it with the same amount of money, doing the same thing?


try thinking about it, or try another thread, and spending time and effort on my thread that you don't understand...cause what is it that you don't understand player?
 
...we need to ask Academia about (Pareto) optimums regarding any socio-economic policies public?

In my opinion, public policies that may promote and provide for the general welfare must have a fiscal multiplier of two or more.
 
The rest look at all these idiots,


trying to give their opinions regarding money,



on a thread they didn't start and which didn't ask them for their opinions...


...look at ALL YOU IDIOTS BEING UNABLE IDIOTS TO ARGUE AGAINST THE BELOW IDIOT!!!!!!

Imagine you do the same thing with the same amount of money twice from its beginning until its end , but one of the times that it takes you more time and effort.

Would you choose again and again to do it when it takes you more time and effort to do it with the same amount of money, doing the same thing?


try thinking about it, or try another thread, and spending time and effort on my thread that you don't understand...cause what is it that you don't understand player?
 
I agree with you under true capitalism not true communism or true socialism unless it is used as a medium of exchange.


it's entirely possible, also, that we define "living well" differently.

Capitalism and socialism run in parallel in every economy in the world.
The lines are simply drawn in different places.
"True" anything, I would think we agree, is always theoretical.
 
Standard of living is attached to wealth in ANY system.

Living well is very expensive everywhere.

The rest look at all these idiots,


trying to give their opinions regarding money,



on a thread they didn't start and which didn't ask them for their opinions...


...look at ALL YOU IDIOTS BEING UNABLE IDIOTS TO ARGUE AGAINST THE BELOW IDIOT!!!!!!

Imagine you do the same thing with the same amount of money twice from its beginning until its end , but one of the times that it takes you more time and effort.

Would you choose again and again to do it when it takes you more time and effort to do it with the same amount of money, doing the same thing?


try thinking about it, or try another thread, and spending time and effort on my thread that you don't understand...cause what is it that you don't understand player?
 
The rest look at all these idiots,


trying to give their opinions regarding money,



on a thread they didn't start and which didn't ask them for their opinions...


...look at ALL YOU IDIOTS BEING UNABLE IDIOTS TO ARGUE AGAINST THE BELOW IDIOT!!!!!!

Imagine you do the same thing with the same amount of money twice from its beginning until its end , but one of the times that it takes you more time and effort.

Would you choose again and again to do it when it takes you more time and effort to do it with the same amount of money, doing the same thing?


try thinking about it, or try another thread, and spending time and effort on my thread that you don't understand...cause what is it that you don't understand player?

This guy is seriously damaged. No need to see his/her/its posts anymore.
 
Back
Top