Into the Night
Verified User
Money is Capital. Capital is Money.
Money is a trading medium. Nothing more.
Money is Capital. Capital is Money.
I agree with you under true capitalism not true communism or true socialism unless it is used as a medium of exchange.
It is your ignorance not any fallacy.True Scotsman fallacy. Non-sequitur fallacy.
A medium of exchange is a store of wealth (as money).Money is a trading medium. Nothing more.
It is your ignorance not any fallacy.
Capitalism may require capital friendly morals for a market friendly price. Socialism only may require social morals for free.
A medium of exchange is a store of wealth (as money).
The difference is, You merely saying that and You coming up with any valid arguments to support your currently unsubstantiated opinion when we should need to quibble.Semantics fallacy. Denial of logic. Denial of self argument.
Physical fiat money and virtual fiat money are stores of wealth as mediums of exchange.No, it isn't. It's a store of value, not wealth. Wealth and only wealth is a store of wealth.
Example: In 1930, $20 would buy one oz of find gold. Today, that same ounce of gold is worth around $1900. The fiat dollar has lost value. A lot of value. The dollar today is worth only 10.6 mils what a dollar in 1930 was worth.
So...if you saved $1000 in 1930 and held it all those years, it would be only be worth today $1.50 (discounting collectors valuation).
If you save, your money is LOSING value. The dollar is NOT a store of wealth.
The difference is, You merely saying that and You coming up with any valid arguments to support your currently unsubstantiated opinion when we should need to quibble.
Nope. They are stores of value.Physical fiat money and virtual fiat money are stores of wealth as mediums of exchange.
You are describing yourself. Inversion fallacy. Bigotry.Nobody takes right-wingers seriously about economics when they can't tell the difference between a store of value and a store of wealth.
I don't believe you; you must be on the right-wing. How are digital and physical fiat money stores of value? Or, do you simply appeal to ignorance of a store of wealth since you are on the right-wing?Nope. They are stores of value.
You are describing yourself. Inversion fallacy. Bigotry.
This guy is seriously damaged. No need to see his/her/its posts anymore.
Nope. They are stores of value.
You are describing yourself. Inversion fallacy. Bigotry.
Physical fiat money and virtual fiat money are stores of wealth as mediums of exchange.
Nobody takes right-wingers seriously about economics when they can't tell the difference between a store of value and a store of wealth.
Are you referring to inflation?The subject is below clown...
you want to argue with your buddies...
...you will not do that on my thread without me getting your way...
get that clown?!
Subject
Imagine you do the same thing with the same amount of money twice from its beginning until its end , but one of the times that it takes you more time and effort.
Would you choose again and again to do it when it takes you more time and effort to do it with the same amount of money, doing the same thing?
try thinking about it, or try another thread, and spending time and effort on my thread that you don't understand...cause what is it that you don't understand player?
I don't believe you; you must be on the right-wing. How are digital and physical fiat money stores of value? Or, do you simply appeal to ignorance of a store of wealth since you are on the right-wing?
Posting.What the hell do you think you are doing on my thread clown?
You don't get to dictate who posts here.Argue on the below or get lost idiot. Why?
You are describing yourself. Inversion fallacy.Cause you are exactly the idiot who needs to get schooled on what money does idiot, and this is what I am doing here idiot, get that clown?
...deleted void question...
Are you referring to inflation?
Posting.
You don't get to dictate who posts here.
You are describing yourself. Inversion fallacy.