Here's what the problem with money is

danielpalos said:
Requiring a work ethic that suppresses wages over equal protection of our own laws seems more rapacious totalitarianism, to me.
Click to expand...

wage suppression is a different issue. but also important.

high taxes should come after you fix the wages situation, no?

for your chinese pictograph mind:

the hungry hawk feeds on the entrails of the timid field mice,

who cease in number,

who will care for the mice? should be a concern of the hawk.
 
AssHatZombie said:
wage suppression is a different issue. but also important.

high taxes should come after you fix the wages situation, no?

for your chinese pictograph mind:

the hungry hawk feeds on the entrails of the timid field mice,

who cease in number,

who will care for the mice? should be a concern of the hawk.
Click to expand...
The point is, equal protection of the laws is the Law for legal purposes. Why should we take right-wingers seriously about their alleged commitment to legality for legal purposes in border threads?

Solving simple poverty via equal protection of our own laws is correcting for Capitalism's natural rate of unemployment via the existing legal and physical infrastructure of unemployment compensation in our at-will employment States. The private sector needs that demand to achieve a new equilibrium for supply.
 
danielpalos said:
The point is, equal protection of the laws is the Law for legal purposes. Why should we take right-wingers seriously about their alleged commitment to legality for legal purposes in border threads?

Solving simple poverty via equal protection of our own laws is correcting for Capitalism's natural rate of unemployment via the existing legal and physical infrastructure of unemployment compensation in our at-will employment States. The private sector needs that demand to achieve a new equilibrium for supply.
Click to expand...

you're not completely wrong.

I think a little more specificity in your discourse could improve your traction here.
 
Into the Night said:
You n ever explained anything. Void question. Ignored.
Click to expand...

I did idiot you are still reading and replying you are just the idiot I am talking about...reading threads that he didn't start, are nonsense to him, and then that idiot keeps on spending time to read them over and over and reply...what an idiot, no?


The rest reading, check out those idiots wasting my time and effort while I explain to them to not do exactly that...

...all those idiots can't do anything apparently on the internet but reply here regarding what those idiots think money does, with their endless money stories...

...as if I didn't explain to those idiot from the first page to not waste others' time and effort with nonsense. Why?




Subject

Imagine you do the same thing with the same amount of money twice from its beginning until its end , but one of the times that it takes you more time and effort.

Would you choose again and again to do it when it takes you more time and effort to do it with the same amount of money, doing the same thing?

try thinking about it, or try another thread, and spending time and effort on my thread that you don't understand...cause what is it that you don't understand player?



Why?
Here's what the problem with money is
 
Money reduces the time and effort spend to trade or
try telling anything else to a woman when you give her money, and the way that you do it...
...increases visibly for her the time and effort she has to spend to have fun, as then sad joker...
...you don't seem to know what money does for her.
Get it sad jokers?

wake up players...
Here's what the problem with money is
 
Last edited:
Equal protection of our own laws can solve simple poverty on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States. Existing legal and physical infrastructure can compensate for Capitalism's natural rate of unemployment in a market friendly manner. Thus, the only problem with money is money management.
 
danielpalos said:
Equal protection of our own laws can solve simple poverty on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States. Existing legal and physical infrastructure can compensate for Capitalism's natural rate of unemployment in a market friendly manner. Thus, the only problem with money is money management.
Click to expand...

so you should have put a different title on your thread, op.
 
danielpalos said:
we subscribe to Capitalism and I can't afford it?
Click to expand...

Second example
When you are talking to people who over and over don't understand what you are saying but over and over keep talking to you and not do something else, do these people over and over make sense? ..and...
...does it make common sense for people to spend time and effort over and over, with people who increase the time and effort that we have to spend to trade with one another, over...and over...and over...or...
...do people who increase the time and effort that we have to spend to trade with one another over and over, over and over waste our time and effort, and we have to ignore them, or we have to deal with them, so that we don't have to spend over and over more time and effort to have fun together?
 
Money reduces the time and effort spend to trade or
try telling anything else to a woman when you give her money, and the way that you do it...
...increases visibly for her the time and effort she has to spend to have fun, as then sad joker...
...you don't seem to know what money does for her.
Get it sad jokers?

wake up players...
Here's what the problem with money is
 
AlexandrosTsolis said:
Money reduces the time and effort spend to trade or
try telling anything else to a woman when you give her money, and the way that you do it...
...increases visibly for her the time and effort she has to spend to have fun, as then sad joker...
...you don't seem to know what money does for her.
Get it sad jokers?

wake up players...
Here's what the problem with money is
Click to expand...
Sorry. I can't get what you are saying under our form of capitalism; it would require some form of socialism for me to understand you better.
 
AlexandrosTsolis said:
I did idiot
Click to expand...
You never did.
AlexandrosTsolis said:
you are still reading and replying you are just the idiot I am talking about...reading threads that he didn't start, are nonsense to him, and then that idiot keeps on spending time to read them over and over and reply...what an idiot, no?


The rest reading, check out those idiots wasting my time and effort while I explain to them to not do exactly that...

...all those idiots can't do anything apparently on the internet but reply here regarding what those idiots think money does, with their endless money stories...

...deleted void questions...
Click to expand...
Insult fallacies. No argument presented. Repetitive void question. Ignored.
 
danielpalos said:
Equal protection of our own laws can solve simple poverty
Click to expand...
Nope. Doesn't address it at all.
danielpalos said:
on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States.
Click to expand...
That has nothing to do with poverty either.
danielpalos said:
Existing legal and physical infrastructure can compensate for Capitalism's natural rate of unemployment
Click to expand...
Capitalism has no unemployment. Anyone that wants to can play.
danielpalos said:
in a market friendly manner.
Click to expand...
Non-sequitur fallacy.
danielpalos said:
Thus, the only problem with money is money management.
Click to expand...

Random phrases. No apparent coherency.
 
AlexandrosTsolis said:
Second example
When you are talking to people who over and over don't understand what you are saying but over and over keep talking to you and not do something else, do these people over and over make sense? ..and...
...does it make common sense for people to spend time and effort over and over, with people who increase the time and effort that we have to spend to trade with one another, over...and over...and over...or...
...do people who increase the time and effort that we have to spend to trade with one another over and over, over and over waste our time and effort, and we have to ignore them, or we have to deal with them, so that we don't have to spend over and over more time and effort to have fun together?
Click to expand...

You do seem to have a problem with English. Run on gibbering like this means very little.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top