Into the Night
Verified User
In right-wing fantasy, y'all are Always Right simply because you are on the right-wing.
By definition, not fantasy. Right wingers are always on the right.
In right-wing fantasy, y'all are Always Right simply because you are on the right-wing.
We are not using it now? It must have failed.
Even people in poverty survive.yes we can survive. with the right action, and attitude.
No, I don't. You do.You push negativity
Buzzword fallacies. Void argument fallacy. You're going to have to define your terms, fella.because you're globalist traitor who doesnt want to take the right actions.
you're a delusional imbecile.
You don't get to order people around.Argue or get lost clown.
Imagine you do the same thing with the same amount of money twice from its beginning until its end , but one of the times that it takes you more time and effort.
Would you choose again and again to do it when it takes you more time and effort to do it with the same amount of money, doing the same thing?
The history of money is a very interesting thing, in small villages it simply used to be about cooperating... When I had extra chickens and you were hungry, I would give you a few, then when you had extra water buckets and I needed them you would give me some. It was about cooperating and being in a community, but money keeping exact track which changed things significantly.
The guy with chickens would keep notes on who he gave how many chickens to, and then demand water buckets later, it was less community and more of an exchange.
Money exacerbated that.
the problem with money is that you idiots don't know what money does...
apparently you can't handle the sound of that...
...well sometimes it is more fun than what you can handle at that moment in your life.
"Hey wait, but sometimes it is less fun than what I want at that moment in my life"
Yes, but when you are having a good time, eh then it is just the right amount of fun.
...and to find those times, I am afraid...
...you need patience to have fun.
Here's what an argument regarding what money does looks like ...
Imagine you do the same thing with the same amount of money twice from its beginning until its end , but one of the times that it takes you more time and effort.
Would you choose again and again to do it when it takes you more time and effort to do it with the same amount of money, doing the same thing?
But why is the above an argument regarding what money does?
Let's see if all here read and understand WHY I AM DOING THIS? Why is that?
To show you how many idiots around you think they know what money does...
...and keep wasting our time and effort with their endless "money" stories.
Do you understand that players here?
Really?
Yes players, really...WHAT PLAYERS?!
NOT REALLY?!!!
Barter is simply the exchange of goods for other goods, with no medium of exchange.
If you sell some chickens for water buckets, that's a transaction. He doesn't need to keep track of how many water buckets are 'owed'. He already has them.
You are describing instead a form of credit.
Barter is different because it’s a specific exchange. What I was describing was a system of giving.
Even the Three Musketeers had better arguments.Ever wonder why you are being ignored?
I'm not sure what you're getting at here. You just seem to be describing a credit transaction (via bartering of goods rather than via an exchange medium).The history of money is a very interesting thing, in small villages it simply used to be about cooperating... When I had extra chickens and you were hungry, I would give you a few, then when you had extra water buckets and I needed them you would give me some. It was about cooperating and being in a community, but money keeping exact track which changed things significantly.
The guy with chickens would keep notes on who he gave how many chickens to, and then demand water buckets later, it was less community and more of an exchange.
Money exacerbated that.
No, otherwise you wouldn't be asking for buckets in return.Barter is different because it’s a specific exchange. What I was describing was a system of giving.
Here's my three musketeers for you idiot...Même les Trois Mousquetaires savaient que l'argent comme moyen d'échange n'est qu'un outil.
I agree to disagree since part of our problem in the US is inequality and unequal protection of our own laws. And we even have a Statue of Liberty; can you imagine?