Hey remember 3 years ago when Anatta was all about Foxconn & Wisconsin...

[Truck Fump / h1b]

Provide proof of this.

You can't and you won't because you have none.

You were just wrong last year. Completely wrong. It's OK to admit you're wrong. I won't think any less of you if you own up to being a fuckup.

So there's no reason for this charade.

cases were dismissed on feeble grounds. evidence was not heard. these are facts.

 

[LV426]

swept under the rug.

Nothing was swept under the rug, you just came up short when it came to proving your claims.

The reason you came up short is because your claims are bullshit.

The sooner you admit that, the sooner we can all move on.

But if you're going to dig your heels in, then we're going to keep linking you to Trump.

 

[LV426]

thats the issue.

No, the issue is that you were wrong, and you're too far into it to reverse yourself now.

 

[Truck Fump / h1b]

Nothing was swept under the rug, you just came up short when it came to proving your claims.

The reason you came up short is because your claims are bullshit.

The sooner you admit that, the sooner we can all move on.

But if you're going to dig your heels in, then we're going to keep linking you to Trump.

we've posted the timeline of the electronic data dumps many times. its shows inordinately large dumps for biden coming in when counting was supposed to be stopped.

you refuse to absorb the data, due to being a corrupt fucknut.

 

[LV426]

maybe judges dont readily disclose their corruption.

So then Trump's a sucker.

And if Trump's a sucker, so are you.

the fact remains

Where are these facts? Nowhere because they don't exist and you've never been able to provide them.

evidence was not fairly examined

Sure it was. The evidence was bullshit, which is why you've been unable to present any of it here, even when prompted.

You can just admit you were hoodwinked. I can't possibly think any less of you if you do.

 

[LV426]

cases were dismissed on feeble grounds.

Oh word? How so and on what grounds?

Where's the evidence?

Oh you have no evidence? Oh. OK then.

evidence was not heard.

You just said in the post before that it was heard and dismissed.

these are facts.

Then you should be able to prove it.

 

[LV426]

we've posted the timeline of the electronic data dumps many times..

No you haven't.

its shows inordinately large dumps for biden coming in when counting was supposed to be stopped.

No it didn't, and no they weren't.

And BTW - you're the ones who didn't want to count Absentee ballots until after the election in most states.

So you are complaining about something you caused.

 

[Truck Fump / h1b]

So then Trump's a sucker.

And if Trump's a sucker, so are you.




Where are these facts? Nowhere because they don't exist and you've never been able to provide them.




Sure it was. The evidence was bullshit, which is why you've been unable to present any of it here, even when prompted.

You can just admit you were hoodwinked. I can't possibly think any less of you if you do.

we've posted it. you just always do your lie routine.

cite the court case in which the evidence was shown to a jury.

 

[LV426]

we've posted it.

Lies. You haven't posted SHIT.

cite the court case in which the evidence was shown to a jury.

You don't have an entitlement to a jury trial at your whims.

Your job is to convince the judges your guy appointed, and you couldn't even do that.

You come up short all the time, just like how you came up short in court, and how you came up short on this thread.

 

[Truck Fump / h1b]

No you haven't.




No it didn't, and no they weren't.

And BTW - you're the ones who didn't want to count Absentee ballots until after the election in most states.

So you are complaining about something you caused.

we'll just agree to disagree. you're not arguing in good faith, and are moronic, and a lie bag.

 

[LV426]

we'll just agree to disagree

I'm not agreeing to that.

You're complaining about a problem you deliberately caused.

So all of this is on you, not me.

you're not arguing in good faith

You're the one who refuses to post evidence.

and are moronic, and a lie bag.

Stop being such a fucking crybaby. It's a bad look.

 

[Truck Fump / h1b]

Lies. You haven't posted SHIT.




You don't have an entitlement to a jury trial at your whims.

Your job is to convince the judges your guy appointed, and you couldn't even do that.

You come up short all the time, just like how you came up short in court, and how you came up short on this thread.

evidence was never properly heard. Fact. or cite the case where it was, liar.

 

[Nordberg]

its there. corrupt judges have never looked at it. truth.

this whole courtroom is out of order.

60 judges, many seated by Trump and Bush agreed that Trump was smoke screening. They said plainly that Trump had no case and they would not waste the court's time.
Trump also lost more recounts than any candidate ever. Trump's every wish was granted and he lost and lost and lost. TRUTH AND FACT.

 

[LV426]

evidence was never properly heard.

Yes it was properly heard by judges your guy picked himself.

Those judges determined that the evidence was bullshit.

So this is a problem YOU created FOR YOURSELF.

 

[Truck Fump / h1b]

60 judges, many seated by Trump and Bush agreed that Trump was smoke screening. They said plainly that Trump had no case and they would not waste the court's time.
Trump also lost more recounts than any candidate ever. Trump's every wish was granted and he lost and lost and lost. TRUTH AND FACT.

so evidence was never heard by a jury. you're admitting this. you lose.

You're gonna have to kills us all. you up for it?

 

[Truck Fump / h1b]

Yes it was properly heard by judges your guy picked himself.

Those judges determined that the evidence was bullshit.

So this is a problem YOU created FOR YOURSELF.

evidence was never heard properly by a jury. the judges were corrupt, even the ones trump picked.

 

[LV426]

evidence was never heard properly by a jury..

Because it wasn't evidence, it was bullshit.

Your own judges that you and Trump picked yourselves are saying it was bullshit.

the judges were corrupt

THEN WHY DID TRUMP PICK THEM?

even the ones trump picked.

So then his judge of character is fucking awful, which means if his judge of character is that shitty, then his judgment on evertything else is shitty too, including the "fraudulent" election.

So if Trump is so fucking incompetent that he picked corrupt judges, then isn't it possible he's so fucking incompetent that his poor judgment is also reflected in his claims about the election being stolen.

So now you've just fucked yourself over on this thread because the same guy who is saying the election was stolen applied the same judgment to choosing "corrupt judges".

So if his judgement is so shitty there, isn't it possible it's also shitty when it comes to the election?

 

[Dutch Uncle]

Isn't Anatta a Propaganda Stooge for the Russian FSB?

Yes. He gives unwavering fealty to Vladimir Putin and the Russian Federation just like all of our Brits do the same to their monarchy. Obviously all are anti-American.

 

[Truck Fump / h1b]

Because it wasn't evidence, it was bullshit.

Your own judges that you and Trump picked yourselves are saying it was bullshit.




THEN WHY DID TRUMP PICK THEM?




So then his judge of character is fucking awful, which means if his judge of character is that shitty, then his judgment on evertything else is shitty too, including the "fraudulent" election.

So if Trump is so fucking incompetent that he picked corrupt judges, then isn't it possible he's so fucking incompetent that his poor judgment is also reflected in his claims about the election being stolen.

So now you've just fucked yourself over on this thread because the same guy who is saying the election was stolen applied the same judgment to choosing "corrupt judges".

So if his judgement is so shitty there, isn't it possible it's also shitty when it comes to the election?

thats for a jury to decide, especially on such an important case. The evidence is not from trump, its time stamped data dumps.

 

[LV426]

thats for a jury to decide

No, that's for a judge to decide and all 60+ judges who looked at your shitty evidence all determined that evidence was shitty.

That's why you still refuse to post the evidence here.

Because if you did, it would get torn apart and you'd be left holding the remains with no one to help you defend it.

especially on such an important case.

What is this evidence, specifically? Why haven't you posted it? Because it doesn't exist and you're lying about it.

The evidence is not from trump, its time stamped data dumps.

Data dumps? You mean votes.

Votes that you didn't want to count before election day because you were trying to get those votes thrown out.

So the "data dumps" are your evidence, then? Evidence of what? Those were ballots YOU DIDN'T WANT TO COUNT BEFOREHAND.

Remember? You're the ones who said we shouldn't count Absentee ballots early. You're the ones who said we should have to wait until after all other votes are counted before counting these.

This is a manufactured problem of your own doing because you didn't want Absentee ballots to be counted, and that's why you demanded and insisted they get counted last.

So the "data dumps" were just tallies of votes that you didn't want to count before Election Day.