Hillary Clinton Ear Mark Queen

Inherently unfair against homosexuals unless you have coed prisons.

LOL. Rarely has anyone seriously proposed coed prisons. That's for a reason, because the rape rates would be astronomical. That being said, we don't not do it because they might have sex. Barring homosexuals from having sex in a faux sense of "fairness" doesn't help.

If heterosexuals want to do it, they should arrange a congenial visit.
 
LOL. Rarely has anyone seriously proposed coed prisons. That's for a reason, because the rape rates would be astronomical. That being said, we don't not do it because they might have sex. Barring homosexuals from having sex in a faux sense of "fairness" doesn't help.

If heterosexuals want to do it, they should arrange a congenial visit.
Again, you ignore that conjugal visits are disallowed. So now we are full circle. Rules are no sex, if you seek protection for sex you are admitting to not following the rules therefore you won't seek it through that particular area. If you are having consensual sex in prison you are breaking the rules, if it is allowed then it again is inherently unfair towards one group.... round and round.... (Note that each time above I said "unless" you change the rules, when speaking of conjugals, to allow conjugal visits again).

This earmark was ill-aimed at solving the problem for which it was designed.
 
Again, you ignore that conjugal visits are disallowed.

I guess some politician in your state decided that that would make him look more tough on crime. That doesn't make it true everywhere. It should be allowed, in any case.
 
Again, you ignore that conjugal visits are disallowed.

I guess some politician in your state decided that that would make him look more tough on crime. That doesn't make it true everywhere. It should be allowed, in any case.
For what reason? Why would somebody who murdered some stranger to me be allowed such a pleasure?
 
But damo it is rehabilitation not punishment :rolleyes:
So? It's the question that will be asked. Anyway, my only point was, without changing the rules the Earmark is destined to just be cash even if it was for condoms. The stated goal is largely impossible to reach because of the current system.
 
Back
Top