Hillary Clinton's popularity has plunged since election, poll finds

C

Cancel 2018.1

New member
Hillary Clinton, well over a year after she lost the 2016 election to President Trump, is less popular than ever, according to a poll released this week.

Only 27 percent of those polled had a very or somewhat positive view of the former secretary of state, according to The Wall Street Journal/NBC News poll. That makes her less popular than President Trump, whose popularity registered at 35 percent. It is a new low for her in the poll, which clocked her popularity at 30 percent in August 2017.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...foxnews/politics+(Internal+-+Politics+-+Text)
Click to expand...
Wow, she had higher favorability than Trump before the election and still lost. And she's the dims' front runner for 2020 (I assume).
Looks like her campaign is going worse than the first two.
I've been saying the only way I vote for Trump in 2020 is if dims run someone as bad as hrc. And only hrc is as bad as hrc. Maybe hrc 3.0 is actually worse than hrc 2.0.
 
She was to old in 2016,be way to old in 2020!
Hillary had one big chance to be President and that was running a hard aggressive attack campaign against George W Bush against his second term.
She played it safe thinking she had the nomination wrapped up the next time.
But Obama came along.And she had missed her chance!
 
Mason said:
She was to old in 2016,be way to old in 2020!
Hillary had one big chance to be President and that was running a hard aggressive attack campaign against George W Bush against his second term.
She played it safe thinking she had the nomination wrapped up the next time.
But Obama came along.And she had missed her chance!
Click to expand...

I don't think she played it safe. She campaigned much better in 2008 than 2016. Soros and Co. just lined up behind Obama with their money which made it too expensive for HRC to compete in the final leg. I think it took her a couple years to pay off her campaign debt she was so in the red after it was over.
 
Kacper said:
I don't think she played it safe. She campaigned much better in 2008 than 2016. Soros and Co. just lined up behind Obama with their money which made it too expensive for HRC to compete in the final leg. I think it took her a couple years to pay off her campaign debt she was so in the red after it was over.
Click to expand...

Is George Soros the boogyman you love to kick around?
 
Kacper said:
I don't think she played it safe. She campaigned much better in 2008 than 2016. Soros and Co. just lined up behind Obama with their money which made it too expensive for HRC to compete in the final leg. I think it took her a couple years to pay off her campaign debt she was so in the red after it was over.
Click to expand...

Your post doesn't touch on her skipping running against Bush his second term.Her best chance to win.If she didn't play it safe,why didn't she challenge Bush?
 
Kacper said:
It is well reported, including that Soros regretted backing Obama over Clinton because Barrack didn't cuddle with him afterwards.
Click to expand...


so only republicans are allowed to have wealthy donors?


dude someone who supports the people and is rich is fine with me

the republican shits want to destroy our democracy so they can own everything


Not Soros
 
floridafan said:
Is George Soros the boogyman you love to kick around?
Click to expand...

Could have swore he faded with Glenn Beck, must be rough over there on the right when they got to regurgitate antiquated scapegoats, ain't easy when there isn't any Clinton or Obama around to bash
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top