Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
Anyone who is never wrong, never admits mistakes, always has an excuse and constantly blames others is, indeed, damaged.Trump talked about the mistakes he made in names. He had a staff ruminate over what was available. He settled for deliberately calling people the wrong names as "humor". It was not funny, wry, or slightly humorous. Trump confused the names as he does so often. Trump is damaged.
Despite all of his money, Trump has self-esteem issues. Probably related to his micro-penis along with a dysfunctional family life and not being very intelligent. Yes, he’s damaged. At 78, despite his riches, he’ll never change. Sad.
What I find most interesting on JPP are the Abbie Normals who relate to Trump and believe him to a good leader.
https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/...why-some-people-will-never-admit-theyre-wrong
Why Some People Will Never Admit They're Wrong
Psychological rigidity is not a sign of strength.
- The typical response to discovering one is wrong is to admit it, either fully or partially.
- Some people refuse to admit they’re wrong, even in the face of overwhelming evidence, due to a fragile ego.
- If one cannot psychologically handle being wrong, they may deny facts to defend their actions or beliefs.
A Fragile Ego Leads to Attempts to Distort Reality
Some people have such a fragile ego, such brittle self-esteem, such a weak "psychological constitution," that admitting they made a mistake or that they were wrong is fundamentally too threatening for their egos to tolerate. Accepting they were wrong, absorbing that reality, would be so psychologically shattering that their defense mechanisms do something remarkable to avoid doing so—they literally distort their perception of reality to make it (reality) less threatening. Their defense mechanisms protect their fragile ego by changing the very facts in their mind, so they are no longer wrong or culpable.
As a result, they come up with statements, such as, "I checked in the morning, and there was enough milk, so someone must have finished it." When it’s pointed out that no one was home after they left in the morning, so no one could have done that, they double down and repeat, “Someone must have, because I checked, and there was milk,” as though some phantom broke into the house, finished the milk and left without a trace.