Home Schooling vs. Compulsory Defenseless Zone Youth Indoctrination

[NiftyNiblick]

Defund libraries and don't send your kids to school.

This is where the GOP is now.

I wonder what Eisenhower would think?
He served as President of Columbia University.

Even Goldwater would be shaking his head.

Red states cannot remain part of this nation if we're to avoid third world status.
It's as simple as that.

 

[gfm7175]

Of course you can't, Sybil. That's a limitation of people with personality disorders.

BTW, I love it when you forget which account you are logged into. LOL

BTW, I love it when I can get you riled up about seeing socks everywhere.

 

[Dutch Uncle]

BTW, I love it when I can get you riled up about seeing socks everywhere.

You're free to your delusions, Sybil. The fact you get riled up because I accuse you and your "friends" of being one and the same is interesting.

Also interesting is how you link IBDaMann's posts on your faux forum/manifesto in your signature.

Useful References:
LISPY LEFTIST LIST OF LINGUISTIC LUNACY<---gfm7175
CULT OF THE MASK ALMANAC AND DESK REFERENCE<---IBDaMann
GLOBAL WARMING MYTHOLOGY REFERENCE MANUAL<---IBDaMann
IT'S BEEN DEBUNKED!!!<---IBDaMann

 

[Concart]

Nope. There is no such thing. You are an idiot.


Nope. Not at all. You are engaging in hyperbole because you have nothing else.


Nope. I certainly advertise as being brilliant because I am surrounded by imbeciles, but I consider myself to be a standard, rational adult ... who coincidentally happens to be surrounded by imbeciles, such as yourself. You are just one of the many idiots who forms violent opinions in areas of his ignorance, simply because those are the opinions he has been ordered to have by people he permits to do his thinking for him. Personally, I would never allow anyone to do my thinking for me, but you are apparently happy to allow anyone to bend you over furniture and ream you with disinformation, as long as he will do your thinking for you, precisely because you find thinking to be just too much work.

If you want to constrain the context to simply the two of us then yes, compared to you, I am brilliant and you are a moron. After all, you fell for Global Warming, didn't you?


Is that because of the way I make fun of Nordberg?

Are you a serial killer or do you beat the shit out of your wife?

 

[gfm7175]

Defund libraries

I did a search for the word 'library' and your use of it here was the only instance of it in this entire thread (until now). So who here is talking about "defunding libraries"? Maybe Terry should be investigating YOU for "multiple personalities" because whatever imaginary friend of yours who you claim brought up defunding libraries is not present anywhere within this thread...

and don't send your kids to school.

Again, whatever imaginary friend of yours who brought up not sending kids to school is not present anywhere within this thread...

This is where the GOP is now.

Your imaginary friend is not the GOP.

I wonder what Eisenhower would think?

Unfortunately for you, you cannot ask dead people what they think.

He served as President of Columbia University.

Yeah. So?

Even Goldwater would be shaking his head.

You can't speak for Goldwater, and even Goldwater himself can no longer speak for himself because he, like Eisenhower, is dead.

Red states cannot remain part of this nation if we're to avoid third world status.
It's as simple as that.

There is no such thing as a "red state" or a "third world". You are speaking gibberish.

 

[gfm7175]

You're free to your delusions, Sybil.

The delusions are yours, as you keep deluding that some 'Sybil' exists here.

The fact you get riled up because I accuse you and your "friends" of being one and the same is interesting.

Riled up?? hahahahahahahahaha I'm LAUGHING at you, dude!

Also interesting is how you link IBDaMann's posts

So?

on your faux forum/manifesto in your signature.

It's not my forum, and it's not a faux forum because you are referring to it and going on it. It exists by your own admission, dude, yet you deny it? Talk about "interesting"... and delusional... and irrational... hahahahahaha

Useful References:
LISPY LEFTIST LIST OF LINGUISTIC LUNACY<---gfm7175

Yup. This is my list of buzzwords. I came up with the idea and I've been updating it every now and then (it's under my control). This is "my baby".

CULT OF THE MASK ALMANAC AND DESK REFERENCE<---IBDaMann

Sort of, but it's mostly mine. I came up with the idea and most of the content within it. I have also been updating it every now and then (it's under my control). IBD wrote the flavorful intro to it, and he flavored up a couple of the definitions, but the rest of it is all mine.

GLOBAL WARMING MYTHOLOGY REFERENCE MANUAL<---IBDaMann
IT'S BEEN DEBUNKED!!!<---IBDaMann

Yup. These are both IBD's creations. They were his ideas and they are both under his control.

 

[Dutch Uncle]

The delusions are yours, as you keep deluding that some 'Sybil' exists here...

...Yup. These are both IBD's creations. They were his ideas and they are both under his control.

The fact my calling you "Sybil" upsets you much is part of why I do it. The main part being, of course, that I believe you are a paranoid schizophrenic. One of the more interesting Abbie Normals on JPP. Lucky you!

Yes, your good "friend". LOL

 

[gfm7175]

The fact my calling you "Sybil" upsets you much is part of why I do it. The main part being, of course, that I believe you are a paranoid schizophrenic. One of the more interesting Abbie Normals on JPP. Lucky you!

Yes, your good "friend". LOL

 

[Dutch Uncle]

I'M CRAZY SYBIL
I'M CRAZY FOR THE DUTCHMAN
DANCE CRAZY WITH ME

You be cray-cray, Sybil.

 

[Nordberg]

I cannot imagine what lends itself to indoctrination better than homeschooling. It is a reaction by parents who disagree with the American educational system. They do not feel their beliefs and home training are getting sufficient shrift in the schools. So they keep them home and inculcate their narrow beliefs in the kids one on one. It is a great way for Nazis to make more Nazis. Religious nuts to make more religious nuts. Haters to make more haters. It is tabula rosa in practice. Imprint your beliefs into the blank and receptive minds of children.

 

[Flash]

Redefinition fallacy. Attempted proof by fiction.

Everything that is true you believe are lies which means your reality is non-existent.

Biden is president and you reject that reality.
MAGA attacked the Capitol on January 6 and you claim that was Democrats
No county had more votes than registered voters and you claim you named that county
The Supreme Court has been interpreting the Constitution for years and you claim they don't
Most of the Bill of Rights have been made applicable to the states through the incorporation process and you claim there is no incorporation

Everything you believe is a lie.

Nothing you believe is real.

 

[Flash]

There was no election in 2020. It faulted due to election fraud by Democrats. I have already presented some of the evidence to you. Argument of the Stone fallacy. RQAA.
Joe Biden was not elected. He was installed as part of a coup by Democrats.

Election fraud by Democrats occurred AGAIN in 2022 elections, faulting several of them. I have already given you some of this evidence as well.

This is a joke. I'm not really sure if you really believe it or just like to argue on JPP. You don't really debate facts but engage in silly answers like RQAA, buzzwords, fallacies, and paradoxes because you have no facts to present.

Your fake news source controls your mind.

 

[domer76]

This is a joke. I'm not really sure if you really believe it or just like to argue on JPP. You don't really debate facts but engage in silly answers like RQAA, buzzwords, fallacies, and paradoxes because you have no facts to present.

Your fake news source controls your mind.

Flash,

You’re one of the most reasonable and well-informed members of the forum. Yet, here you are, giving time and air to one of the bottom of the heap. The fewer of this guy and his socks, the better off this forum is.

 

[Flash]

Flash,

You’re one of the most reasonable and well-informed members of the forum. Yet, here you are, giving time and air to one of the bottom of the heap. The fewer of this guy and his socks, the better off this forum is.

Hope springs eternal. I think his socks are started to get themselves mixed up

 

[Mason Michaels]

Fair enough. Which is preferable?

1. Using tax dollars to compulsorily herd children into defenselessness zones for maximum active-shooter convenience while the children are systematically programmed by a leftist political curriculum to be woke, undereducated, scientifically illiterate and mathematically incompetent HATERS

*or*

2. Give parents full control of their children's education while allowing the children to be educated in the safety and convenience of their own homes without imposing any tax burden on We the People and without supporting any teachers unions that serve no other purpose than to snuff the life out of any community education program.


Thoughts?

Sounds good! But I have seen home schooling at work!
Parents are at work,their kids hang out with the other homeschooled kids at the library online,every hour they go out back and get high

 

[Into the Night]

What "Big Lies"?

He thinks Joe Biden was actually elected!

Define 'reality'

He doesn't recognize philosophy. He doesn't understand what 'reality' even means or why it's defined that way.

At least you accept the proof of identity (?A -> A)... I suppose that's a start...

?A->A is not the proof of identity (which isn't a proof, it's an axiom). That axiom states: A->A. There is no 'if'.
This expression describes a circular argument, or an argument of faith.

An example of identity is 'Red is a color' (A), therefore 'Red is a color' (->A).
An example of a circular argument is a bit different, but very similar. It can two related forms: direct and indirect.
The direct form might take the form: If Jesus Christ is who He says He is, namely the Son of God (?A) then Jesus Christ is the Son of God (->A). This is the initial circular argument, or argument of faith of Christianity.
The indirect form references a 2nd argument: If the Bible is True (?A), then Jesus Christ is the Son of God for the Bible is True and it says so (->A&B).

Both forms are circular arguments, which is also an argument of faith. Both are valid expressions.

Who is 'we'?

This is the classic Marxist 'we'. Flash falls into this mistake from time to time because he doesn't do his homework properly.

Evidence has already been provided to you years ago. You've denied it. That's your issue.

I even recently provided much of this evidence again just a few days ago. He is simply making an argument of the Stone, a fallacy. As a result, he keeps asking the same inane question over and over even though it's already been answered. Quite mindless.

Worse, he fixates on some unrelated piece of 'evidence' that someone claimed that isn't even evidence, and uses that to try to disprove or deny all evidence (a compositional error fallacy, triggered by cherry picking). It's an attempted proof by Stone, a fallacy.

 

[Into the Night]

Defund libraries and don't send your kids to school.

This is where the GOP is now.

I wonder what Eisenhower would think?
He served as President of Columbia University.

Even Goldwater would be shaking his head.

Red states cannot remain part of this nation if we're to avoid third world status.
It's as simple as that.

How classic. A compositional error fallacy caused by a contextomy fallacy and gaslighting.
You even try to speak for the dead. Omniscience fallacy.

There is no such thing as a 'third world'. Earth is one world.

I realize you are dead set on having kids go to public schools so they can receive your indoctrination, but fortunately there are much better ways to educate kids.

 

[gfm7175]

?A->A is not the proof of identity (which isn't a proof, it's an axiom). That axiom states: A->A. There is no 'if'.
This expression describes a circular argument, or an argument of faith.

An example of identity is 'Red is a color' (A), therefore 'Red is a color' (->A).
An example of a circular argument is a bit different, but very similar. It can two related forms: direct and indirect.
The direct form might take the form: If Jesus Christ is who He says He is, namely the Son of God (?A) then Jesus Christ is the Son of God (->A). This is the initial circular argument, or argument of faith of Christianity.
The indirect form references a 2nd argument: If the Bible is True (?A), then Jesus Christ is the Son of God for the Bible is True and it says so (->A&B).

Both forms are circular arguments, which is also an argument of faith. Both are valid expressions.

Whoops. It looks like I did express that erroneously. Thanks for the correction.

 

[Into the Night]

BTW, I love it when I can get you riled up about seeing socks everywhere.

 

[Into the Night]

Whoops. It looks like I did express that erroneously. Thanks for the correction.

It's an easy one to make, since the two are so similar. Don't sweat it!