Home Schooling vs. Compulsory Defenseless Zone Youth Indoctrination

it opens to abuse and indoctrination.
The important thing is that it never leads to indoctrination against the will of the parents. That's why you have no examples of that. If Hindu parents want to indoctrinate their children into Hinduism, that's fine, and there won't be any chance of the children being forcibly indoctrinated into anti-Hindu Marxist ideology.
 
Serious question: Is that what Donald Trump represents? An EVASIVE PIVOT? I've noticed that whenever a leftist begins getting his ass handed to him, he pivots to talking about Donald Trump, and the previous topic supposedly just goes away.

Am I spot on? It's what you just did, right? Am I supposed to be talking about Trump now? What am I supposed to say?

Well, since my comment was not directed at you personally, but rather a comment in response to BidenPresident, I am not in any position to say what you are supposed to say.
 
Just out of curiosity, what specific part(s) of choice #2 make(s) it unappealing? (please don't write "all of it")

It would not be unappealing if it represented reality, but neither choice does so. There are several negative stereotypes of public schools and several unlikely scenarios for home schooling.
 
The important thing is that it never leads to indoctrination against the will of the parents. That's why you have no examples of that. If Hindu parents want to indoctrinate their children into Hinduism, that's fine, and there won't be any chance of the children being forcibly indoctrinated into anti-Hindu Marxist ideology.

In other words, you find indoctrination acceptable as long as the parents do it.
 
If the WOKE Revolution gets far enough, which is likely, homeschooling will be illegal and prevented. The cost will be the removal of the kids from the family.
 
If the WOKE Revolution gets far enough, which is likely, homeschooling will be illegal and prevented. The cost will be the removal of the kids from the family.
Correct. This is the Communist Manifesto vision. Children will be removed from the home/family and each child will be assigned to a work/study program in some agro/industrial sector, and the child's life and education will be intertwined with the job/career that he is to have.

Communist Manifesto:
8. Equal liability of all to labour. Establishment of industrial armies, especially for agriculture.
9. Combination of agriculture with manufacturing industries; gradual abolition of the distinction between town and country, by a more equable distribution of the population over the country.
10. Free education for all children in public schools. Abolition of children's factory labour in its present form. Combination of education with industrial production,
 
Correct. This is the Communist Manifesto vision. Children will be removed from the home/family and each child will be assigned to a work/study program in some agro/industrial sector, and the child's life and education will be intertwined with the job/career that he is to have.

The family has been under relentless attack for 50 years. The consequences are catastrophic for the society, but look at how well it has worked out for the WOKE FUCKS.
 
It would not be unappealing if it represented reality, but neither choice does so.
So tell me, in what way(s) specifically is the OP inaccurate? I'm not asking how you dislike any characterization or wording. I want to know how it is inaccurate.

It's just a question as to which is preferable, A or B.
 
So tell me, in what way(s) specifically is the OP inaccurate? I'm not asking how you dislike any characterization or wording. I want to know how it is inaccurate.

It's just a question as to which is preferable, A or B.

You presented to us only two choices. Clearly the answer is B. The fallacy is forcing the answer.
 
The WOKE are anti-human so you being destroyed for disobedience does not bother them in the least. You will find the same thing with your kids not being in their indoctrination centers exactly like you will find if you disobey them after they have demanded that you turn in your guns.

Your life will be effectively over.
 
I am much smarter and more articulate than you.
Oh yeah, of course you are, especially when you tell me to "shut the fuck up" three times straight. I have been a follower of your eloquence for some time now. You are truly brilliant.

I would never allow my children to have the same stupidity imposed on them as the one with which you are cursed. I pity you.
 
You presented to us only two choices. Clearly the answer is B. The fallacy is forcing the answer.
Good news. No answer is forced.

I see that your deaf-person studies has taught you that if you don't like a particular conclusion that you simply call it a fallacy. Does that work for you with other deaf people? I mean, it should, right?
 
Back
Top