Homosexuality is not a sin

Dude, you've proved you cherry-pick the Bible to spread your evil ways. Enjoy your time in Hell, cocksucker.

The OT says homosexuality is a sin, but Jesus changed all that including you being able to eat a pulled-pork sammich and a few raw oysters while you are quoting the OT about homosexuals.

Your actions are clearly evil thus can only be from Satan himself, not Jesus.

For some reason they have chosen to pretend parts of the Old Testament do not exist, and chosen that other parts of the Old Testament are law. It is interesting coincidence that it fits with modern culture and the way they want to live today.
 
Last edited:
For some reason they have chosen to pretend parts of the Old Testament do not exist, and chosen that other parts of the New Testament are law. It is interesting coincidence that it fits with modern culture and the way they want to live today.

It's because they are cherry-picking assholes using the Bible as a club to beat others.

Fuck them.
 
For some reason they have chosen to pretend parts of the Old Testament do not exist, and chosen that other parts of the New Testament are law. It is interesting coincidence that it fits with modern culture and the way they want to live today.

:rolleyes:
 
Humans are forgiven, even before they are born. It’s love from God that causes it, there is nothing we must do to earn it or attain it, it’s simply is the way of the world.
 
Last edited:
Humans are forgiven, even before they are born. It’s love from God that causes it, there is nothing we must do to earn it or attain it, it’s simply is the way of the world.

Something Satanists like Pmp and Matt will never understand or accept.
 
Something Satanists like Pmp and Matt will never understand or accept.

They have a sickness or malignancy inside them that they are having trouble releasing, often I think it is due to a parent who was physically or verbally abusive. They believe themselves to be bad and can’t shake the sickness.

If they could except that they are automatically loved and forgiven, the malignancy would disappear.
 
They have a sickness or malignancy inside them that they are having trouble releasing, often I think it is due to a parent who was physically or verbally abusive. They believe themselves to be bad and can’t shake the sickness.

If they could except that they are automatically loved and forgiven, the malignancy would disappear.

Haters gonna hate

 
I agree with everything except the 'born gay/straight' part.
I think some people are born straight or gay or bi.
I do not believe that everyone who calls themselves 'gay' was born 'gay'.
Though probably most of them were.

Also, I agree that many conservatives have a terrible attitude towards homosexuality.

But I also think that many on the left currently have a horrible attitude towards Political Correctness/canceling/etc..

There is fault on both sides.

You might not be wrong about a few "choosing." But ultimately, people don't control their attractions.

"There is fault on both sides" sounds like Trump re: Charlottesville. I'd agree that PC & all that is annoying - but it does nowhere near the damage that discrimination against LGBTQ does.
 
Romans 1:26-32 — For this reason God gave them up to vile passions. For even their *women exchanged the natural use for what is against nature. Likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust for one another, men with men committing what is shameful, and receiving in themselves the penalty of their error which was due. And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a debased mind, to do those things which are not fitting; being filled with all unrighteousness, sexual immorality, wickedness, covetousness, maliciousness; full of envy, murder, strife, deceit, evil-mindedness; they are whisperers, backbiters, haters of God, violent, proud, boasters, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents, undiscerning, untrustworthy, unloving, unforgiving, unmerciful; who, knowing the righteous judgment of God, that those who practice such things are deserving of death, not only do the same but also approve of those who practice them.

*There can be no doubt what this underlined section is describing.

1 Corinthians 6:9-10 — Do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived. Neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor homosexuals, nor sodomites, nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners will inherit the kingdom of God.

The word translated “homosexuals” defined from the original Greek: μαλακός malakos; soft, figuratively, a catamite: — effeminate, soft. In a bad sense effeminate of a catamite … kept for homosexual relations with a man or a male who submits his body to unnatural lewdness

The word translated “sodomites” defined from the original Greek: ἀρσενοκοίτης arsenokoitēs; a sodomite: — abuser of (that defile) self with mankind. To defile (one's) self with mankind; One who lies with a male as with a female, sodomite, homosexual

1 Timothy 1:9-10 — knowing this: that the law is not made for a righteous person, but for the lawless and insubordinate, for the ungodly and for sinners, for the unholy and profane, for murderers of fathers and murderers of mothers, for manslayers, for fornicators, for sodomites, for kidnappers, for liars, for perjurers, and if there is any other thing that is contrary to sound doctrine,

While you can argue that the Bible shouldn’t be used in lawmaking (and we’d agree on that) or that one’s religious beliefs shouldn’t be a determining factor in his voting (I would argue that the religious person can’t ignore his beliefs when he votes), when you say things like “Homosexuality [is] simply not called sin in the Bible,” you are wrong.

The person who reads the above passages alone cannot help but to come to the conclusion that homosexuality is sinful according to the Bible. You can use your lawyer-speak to try to get around it if you want but when you do you are being very dishonest trying to say the Bible doesn’t teach something that it plainly does.
 
While you can argue that the Bible shouldn’t be used in lawmaking (and we’d agree on that) or that one’s religious beliefs shouldn’t be a determining factor in his voting (I would argue that the religious person can’t ignore his beliefs when he votes), when you say things like “Homosexuality [is] simply not called sin in the Bible,” you are wrong.

The person who reads the above passages alone cannot help but to come to the conclusion that homosexuality is sinful according to the Bible. You can use your lawyer-speak to try to get around it if you want but when you do you are being very dishonest trying to say the Bible doesn’t teach something that it plainly does.

Above in your quotes the only place sin is mentioned puts Sinners and Sodomites in separate categories.
 
Last edited:
While you can argue that the Bible shouldn’t be used in lawmaking (and we’d agree on that) or that one’s religious beliefs shouldn’t be a determining factor in his voting (I would argue that the religious person can’t ignore his beliefs when he votes), when you say things like “Homosexuality [is] simply not called sin in the Bible,” you are wrong.

The person who reads the above passages alone cannot help but to come to the conclusion that homosexuality is sinful according to the Bible. You can use your lawyer-speak to try to get around it if you want but when you do you are being very dishonest trying to say the Bible doesn’t teach something that it plainly does.

they also can't be honest about what the bill of rights says.

these totalitarian libs are lying posses.
 
Conservatives celebrate, elect & even worship an admitted adulterer, but when it comes to homosexuals, it's almost nothing but scorn, bullying and intolerance.
 
While you can argue that the Bible shouldn’t be used in lawmaking (and we’d agree on that) or that one’s religious beliefs shouldn’t be a determining factor in his voting (I would argue that the religious person can’t ignore his beliefs when he votes), when you say things like “Homosexuality [is] simply not called sin in the Bible,” you are wrong.

The person who reads the above passages alone cannot help but to come to the conclusion that homosexuality is sinful according to the Bible. You can use your lawyer-speak to try to get around it if you want but when you do you are being very dishonest trying to say the Bible doesn’t teach something that it plainly does.

They also used the Bible to justify slavery, segregation and forbid interracial marriage. :dunno:
 
While you can argue that the Bible shouldn’t be used in lawmaking (and we’d agree on that) or that one’s religious beliefs shouldn’t be a determining factor in his voting (I would argue that the religious person can’t ignore his beliefs when he votes), when you say things like “Homosexuality [is] simply not called sin in the Bible,” you are wrong.

The person who reads the above passages alone cannot help but to come to the conclusion that homosexuality is sinful according to the Bible. You can use your lawyer-speak to try to get around it if you want but when you do you are being very dishonest trying to say the Bible doesn’t teach something that it plainly does.

Plus Sodomites are not the same as homosexuals.
 
Back
Top