Homosexuality is not a sin

Nah. It's an acorn. It has few if any characteristics of a tree.

If it is germinated it has all the characteristics necessary. Much like a human life begins at conception. Is it a "person" yet? That's philosophical, but it is a human life. It will not grow into something other than a tree, just as the burgeoning human life would not grow into something other than at least one human (it could twin you know and be more than one, but at the time of conception it is only one).
 
And it's not "abnormal." People are born homosexuals, just as they are born heterosexuals. I'd actually argue that treating gay people any differently from heterosexuals is an affront to God's creative intent.

Only about 5-10% of people are born homosexuals. Therefore, they are not the "norm" meaning they are abnormal. You want to attach a negative connotation to the term abnormal when it only means they deviate from the norm.

A 6'7" inch person deviates from the norm as does a person with a 150 I.Q. Abnormal can be a positive thing.
 
Only about 5-10% of people are born homosexuals. Therefore, they are not the "norm" meaning they are abnormal. You want to attach a negative connotation to the term abnormal when it only means they deviate from the norm.

A 6'7" inch person deviates from the norm as does a person with a 150 I.Q. Abnormal can be a positive thing.

Are people with blue eyes abnormal?
 
Nope. The Federal Reserve does that, under authority of Congress and the Treasury.

They do.

No. The FED is the cash factory, not the Treasury.

Congress decides what matters with the Fed.

the mint is under the treasury, and just makes dollars and coins, the physical objects.

they have no say in the money supply or rates.

WHy are you misrepresenting this on every level?


very little money makes it into cash. most is in computers as "permission to have".

This seems like more of your libertarian garbage where everything bad is "government" and everything "private" is angelic, pure, and moral.

don't be such a LIBOR.
 
Yes, most of the folks on this planet have dark eyes and darker skin than those folks. It is not the norm for folks to have blue eyes.

Do we tell people with blue eyes, "you're not normal?"

Do we try to get people with blue eyes to go to clinics to "un-blue" their eyes?
 
that's bullcrap.

I know there's a romans quote.

that's a part of the bible that's totally gay.

totalitarians can find what they need in the bible.

so can freedom lovers.

which wolf do you feed?

Totalitarian’s like to marginalize and exploit minorities, so I’m with the freedom lovers.
 
There are connotations to the words "normal" and "abnormal." That's just the way it is.

Not being in a majority is not "abnormal." Having blue eyes is not "abnormal." We never ascribe that word to people with blue eyes.
 
Back
Top