People died and she and her group sent Rice out to try to bury it in the catbox. This is far different than "I was instrumental in the development of the internet"... It was "What difference does it make?!!!" while talking about how she tried to cover up the Administration's (her) responsibility with stupid video assertions.
I'll tell you what difference it makes, it underlines that her first priority is to cover turds up rather than clean them out. Not something we need in any President.
There is another way for Republicans to win....
Use Citizens United the way it's intended. Filter all foreign and drug cartel money thru the Heritage foundation down to all the different money laundering groups that are already set up. Pump billions thru these groups to buy air time, don't worry the Saudis and communist Chinese have more than enough to finance this. Then let the lies, half truths, and innuendoes begin. The left will be swamped with so many lies that they can't possibly, by sheer volume, respond to them all. Tell some whoppers and see what sticks to the wall. Then do children and puppy ads for Teabaggers. Lie and tell the middle class that the right has their best interests in mind. Drive it home and don't let up for a solid year. It's like carpet bombing propaganda and lies.
It's your only hope, you can't win on your record or your party's platform.
Ironic, given that The Hildebeast is raking in the cash for her super PACs with nary a tear...
http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2014/01/how-dems-learned-love-super-pacs-citizens-united
What Clinton is collecting is just a drop in the bucket to the hidden slush money available to the Republicons thru big oil and their foreign partners. Spend spend spend it's your only hope.
What Clinton is collecting is just a drop in the bucket to the hidden slush money available to the Republicons thru big oil and their foreign partners.
She'll never separate herself from, "What difference does it make?"
and some how, you think that will make a difference???
methinks not to the middle of the bell curve, either.
You could be right, Commander.
On Benghazi, you are correct that a valid argument can be made regarding "incompetence in office" (I disagree, but its a valid argument).
The problem is that Republicans have spoiled that argument by trying to make it into something bigger than it is. It would have been one thing to make the incompetence argument, and likely lots of points could have been made doing that, but they tried to make it into much more, and thus have lost creditability on the entire issue.
Almost any republican could win if they'd stay on message. This guy has presided over the most ineffective stimulus since the Great Depression, with more people giving up entirely on jobs than anybody ever before, even more than Carter. He's out borrowed every single President form George Washington to Clinton combined to no avail and continues to promote generational theft as a solution to all our debt issues.
If the republicans can't take advantage of that, stay on message, talk about how better solutions that don't cost 74 cents on every dollar spent to get 26 cents to those in need can only come from other than the Blessed BiggerGovernment gods then they deserve to lose.
The Hildebeasts' election is inevitable. Democrats say so.