How Can Republicans Keep Supporting Such Sleazeballs? It Makes Absolutely No Sense!!

Hello Irthriuth,

you seem to think conservatives are actually voting for a predator and we dont mind. The truth of the matter is, we categorically deny fords fake claims. so kavanaugh is the best people.

I believe in the sincerity and the accuracy of Dr Ford's testimony. That causes me to suspect that the other accusers are also credible. I think this judge was a pampered elite rich kid who was accustomed to getting his way, and apparently that included using others as sexual playthings against their will.

And of course you have to deny Ford's testimony.

If you tried to claim that 'Oh well that was a long time ago and maybe he did it, but now he has changed,' Then you have to let Kav off of a perjury charge.
 
you seem to think conservatives are actually voting for a predator and we dont mind. The truth of the matter is, we categorically deny fords fake claims. so kavanaugh is the best people.

Ford was careful and factual. She was not defiant. She was a woman who had a case to state and did it carefully and clearly. She showed control and intelligence. I can see why you rejected that, it did not fit your preconceptions. He gave horrible testimpony, yelling screaming, angry and defiant. those are the very characteristics that an abuser would have. He abused a woman senator, Klobuchar, . Did you not see that? In order to think he was truthful, you would have to be so one sided that nothing would move you. he has a history of lying to congress. He is a conspiracy nut . He showed himself a terrible choice for the Supremes.
 
Ford was careful and factual. She was not defiant. She was a woman who had a case to state and did it carefully and clearly. She showed control and intelligence. I can see why you rejected that, it did not fit your preconceptions. He gave horrible testimpony, yelling screaming, angry and defiant. those are the very characteristics that an abuser would have. He abused a woman senator, Klobuchar, . Did you not see that? In order to think he was truthful, you would have to be so one sided that nothing would move you. he has a history of lying to congress. He is a conspiracy nut . He showed himself a terrible choice for the Supremes.

I agree completely, Nordberg.

Anyone watching the testimony of Ford and Kavanaugh who comes away giving greater credence to what Kavanaugh said, and the way he said it, is determined to reject Ford's version of things NO MATTER WHAT.

Unfortunately, puppets have to be puppets...and Irthriuth is a puppet.

If Kavanaugh is confirmed to the seat...the SCOTUS will be the lesser for it...and so will our nation.
 
He might have SAID he was not guilty but he sure didn't ACT that way!

Cool, calm, collected, confident of his innocence?

NOT!!!
 
I would be bad for our country to put a lying drunken sexual assault monster on the Supreme Court.

Only ugly partisanship could do that.
 
Ford is not credible. You were predisposed to find her that way. I agree with you regarding Kavanaugh. He has only himself to blame for that.

Ford was completely credible.

May she have gotten some things wrong.

Yeah.

But she was credible.

Kavanaugh's testimony was horrendous.
 
Dr, Ford has co-authored at least one academic paper about hypnosis and implanting false memories. It isn't like her Ph.D is in home economics. It is in psychological research.
 
Have you read Rachel Mitchell's report? If you have, can you tell us any portions with which you disagree?

Mitchell was paid to try and find something to hurt Fords credibility. She tried with that stupid not liking flying. "You went on vacation to the islands" Did you fly?'. WTF think she swam. i hate flying, but sometimes you have to. It was a silly tack but if she could find an inconsistency, she could brand Ford as a liar. She tried for hours.
 
Mutual support for each other

maxresdefault.jpg
 
Back
Top