How is Richardson...

SF, I read more non-fiction books in a month then you do in a year, so you can knock that crap off please.


.
OH boy, does THat open up a new can of worms HEH HEH, but I won't indulge myself in such enjoyment.
 
One out of 3 ain't bad. No doubt he's a long shot, but I'll bet the farm that he's the next secretary of state. He knows more about foreign policy, and has better ideas, than any other Dem candidate...

Biden certainly has the foreign policy creds... but I wouldn't put him ahead of Richardson with regard to the ideas... and Richardson is not that far behind Biden on the foreign policy front either.
 
:clink: Biden doesn't know the first step of being presidential.
and for you cypress castro type wingers of the dem party.
Millions of employees and shareholders work for the greatest corps in the world here in america.
Any dem who wins has to know corp is not a dirty word. Period
 
:clink: Biden doesn't know the first step of being presidential.
and for you cypress castro type wingers of the dem party.
Millions of employees and shareholders work for the greatest corps in the world here in america.
Any dem who wins has to know corp is not a dirty word. Period


False outrager turbo toppy. R U runin' for prezidnt? how bigs yer house?

tryin to teech ya, grasshoper. clazz dismised.
:clink:
 
Biden doesn't know the first step of being presidential.

This is a completely meaningless statement. You have nothing. All you have is, he's not Hillary Clinton.

Face it Topper, you've been struck by cupid.

Let's have alittle song for Topper and Hillary:

Her hair is soft and her eyes are oh so blue
She's all the things a girl should be,
but she's not you.

She knows just how to make me laugh when I feel blue
She's ev'rything a man could want,
but she's not you.

And when we're dancing
It almost feels the same
I've got to stop myself from
Whisp'ring your name

She even kisses me like you used to do.
And it's just breaking my heart
'cause she's not you.
 
biden has made numerous assinine statements that are called such by all but the koolaid drinkers.
I'll switch to Obama/Edwards if they win with the astronomical odds they have it looks doubtfull.
those three and Richardson are the only ones even remotely presidential.
 
"biden has made numerous assinine statements that are called such by all but the koolaid drinkers."

Well, there's your proof. I knew toppy could be counted on for detailed, factual backup for his wild assertions...
 
biden has made numerous assinine statements that are called such by all but the koolaid drinkers.
I'll switch to Obama/Edwards if they win with the astronomical odds they have it looks doubtfull.
those three and Richardson are the only ones even remotely presidential.

He made one stupid comment about Obama, that's the only one I know of.

I loved his answer to the gun loon at the youtube debate. Loved it.
 
biden has made numerous assinine statements that are called such by all but the koolaid drinkers.
I'll switch to Obama/Edwards if they win with the astronomical odds they have it looks doubtfull.
those three and Richardson are the only ones even remotely presidential.


biden has made numerous assinine statements that are called such by all but the koolaid drinkers.



But, you voted for Bush...twice.
 
Biden's not in the top 4 is he
Hillary 47%
Obama way back at 22%
Edwards has the gay dem vote as the breck girl 12%
no one else can get double digits
I like Richardson as the MJ man and energy experience
the rest are jokes as are the freaktards that support them
 
I didn't realize topper was a 2-timer on Bush.

It's really interesting to be lectured by someone like that one "what looks Presidential", or on anything related to the Presidency, or intelligence...
 
"Biden's not in the top 4 is he"

Was Bush the best Republican candidate in 2000?

Was Kerry the best Dem in 2004?

Does the fact that Bush won twice mean he's more "Presidential" and a higher quality candidate than anyone else out there?

These are the voters whose accomplishments you seem to hold in high regard...
 
Very good for the economy
very bad for anti war people which is 90% of why I switch to dems

Bush had almost nothing to do w/ the economy. He hasn't really had an economic policy. Housing propped up a huge portion of the economy for years, and he had nothing to do with that (we're seeing that in the recent market correction, btw - something which you laughed at me about a few months back).

I always forget, though - you're economically illiterate....
 
"Biden's not in the top 4 is he"

Was Bush the best Republican candidate in 2000?

Was Kerry the best Dem in 2004?

Does the fact that Bush won twice mean he's more "Presidential" and a higher quality candidate than anyone else out there?

These are the voters whose accomplishments you seem to hold in high regard...

ummmm.... NO, NO and NO.
 
way better off economically than you can display oncedumbass
Market correction, lol up 6% for the year still
Bush tax cuts spurred the economy for that created the exponentially exploiding investor (uppermiddle class)
His wise energy policy gave us ultra cheap fuel for most of his two terms.
 
"Bush tax cuts spurred the economy for that created the exponentially exploiding investor (uppermiddle class)
His wise energy policy gave us ultra cheap fuel for most of his two terms."

That's all we really need to know about the extent of your economic & political knowledge. Thanks for saying it better than I ever could have...
 
Hey Onceler you are talking about my self professed master teacher of economics there ...Good job keep it up Onceler. :)
 
Back
Top