How much longer do you think Fascistbook&Twitler will be able to partisanly censor?

[Legion]

OMG since when is a dismissal the same as a pre-trial settlement?? turn in your law license

He's come close a few times. PM me for details.

 

[Legion]

As far as I'm concerned, Twitter, Youtube, Google, and Facebook have all lost Section 230 protections. They are political blogs now, open to slander lawsuits by their banned users and monopoly lawsuits.
It's time to hit 'em where it hurts....in the wallet.

That will never happen to platforms that favor the left, now that Biden has been "elected".

Those that refuse to go along (like JustPlainPolitics.com) will soon find themselves under duress from the Biden administration, IMO. Damocles may be unable to avoid being shut down.

 

[Micawber]

Why are you deplorables pro fraud?

 

[Damocles]

 

[Into the Night]

If you don't like what the platforms do, you don't have to use them.

You don't have a Constitutional Right to Facebook.

Facebook doesn't have a constitutional right to slander either.

 

[Into the Night]

Even if they were doing that, I would hope under the first amendment they would always be able to.

No, dude. Slander is not protected by the 1st amendment.

 

[Into the Night]

The tech oligarchs got an exemption from the 1st amendment. It called section 230. The gov't failed to protect our free speech.

They have lost Section 230 protections. They are just political blogs now, making statements in their user's names. It is slander. It is nothing but.

 

[Into the Night]

Twitter is a private company that can pretty much do what they want. Just like Fox News, which of course you never complain about.

No, they cannot. No private company is immune from slander. These companies have opened themselves up to lawsuits.

 

[Into the Night]

The tech companies are not a part of the government, they’ve always been free to censor speech. They didn’t need an exemption.

They are not free to censor speech and keep Section 230 protections. They are slandering their users. They are open to lawsuits.

 

[Micawber]

Truth matters, dickweed. Why are you pro fraud?

 

[Into the Night]

one size fits all is for dumbasses. this devil is in the details. a foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of small minds.

besides, fascism would be facebook taking over the government.

Learn what fascism means.

 

[Into the Night]

Until an alternative arrives.

Already here. Gab. Twitter is also open to lawsuits. They have no protections from them.

 

[Into the Night]

Depends on how much longer the fucking lying right-wing scumbags keep trying to use it as a platform to spread blatant, obvious fucking LIES AND PROPAGANDA.

When your assholes stop posting bullshit they'll stop being "censored" as you so inaccurately put it.

Seems simple enough to most of us.

Slander. Bigotry.

 

[Into the Night]

Nick Sandman was able to sue CNN for spreading lies about him, but he couldn't sue Twitter and Fascistbook for doing the same thing.

Yes he can. Twitter and Facebook have no protections.

 

[floridafan]

No, they cannot. No private company is immune from slander. These companies have opened themselves up to lawsuits.

can you document slander? I didn't think so!

 

[Into the Night]

The Sandman - CNN case was dismissed.

Irrelevant. Lawsuits can be filed anyway.

 

[Jarod]

No, they cannot. No private company is immune from slander. These companies have opened themselves up to lawsuits.

They are not producing the slander, they are not the author of the slander. Slander is not a crime.

 

[Into the Night]

The fact that social media "fact-checkers" have failed to act on anti-Trump lies and propaganda would seem simple enough to the simple. and that makes you so mad.

The Media Research Center’s Techwatch department analyzed two years of social media posts from Trump, Biden, and their respective campaigns. The analysis did not include any ads from PACs or super PACs that had made ads in favor of either candidate. It also focused on social media posts, not paid advertisements, from the campaigns. These numbers were collected from between May 2018 to October 16, 2020.


https://newsbusters.org/blogs/techwatch/corinne-weaver/2020/10/19/twitter-facebook-censored-trump-campaign-65-times-leave

'Fact checkers' don't check facts. If a fact is challenged, it ceased to be a fact and becomes an argument.

 

[Jarod]

They are not free to censor speech and keep Section 230 protections. They are slandering their users. They are open to lawsuits.

Where are they slandering users? I don’t think you understand what slander is?!?

It’s not even libel.

 

[Into the Night]

Is it?

Yes. It is socialist to want government control of private enterprise and markets. Socialism is theft of wealth. Only capitalism can create wealth.