blackascoal
The Force is With Me
Yep we are a terrorist supporting nation.
One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter .. just ask Ronald Reagan who called the Taliban, "freedom fighters."
Yep we are a terrorist supporting nation.
You're kidding, right?
Do you know how much Iraq will cost us when all is said & done?
Use your head.
One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter .. just ask Ronald Reagan who called the Taliban, "freedom fighters."
Pay attention... Desh said it was due to OBL.... Iraq was not a result of OBL...
Pay attention... Desh said it was due to OBL.... Iraq was not a result of OBL...
Instigating America to destroy Iraq was a triumph of genius. He must have known about the neoconservative cabal in Washington that was itching to start wars and destroy Iraq. In bin Laden's wildest dreams he then imagined that he could get an enraged America to destroy his enemies while, at the same time, isolating itself from allies and becoming seriously weakened. His prime Arab enemy, secular nationalist socialism, was embodied by the Ba'athist rulers in Iraq
Bush , his supporters and fraidy cats in the USA are responsible for Iraq.
"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line." --President Bill Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998
"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program." --President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998
"Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face." --Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998
"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983." --Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998
"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs." Letter to President Clinton, signed by: -- Democratic Senators Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others, Oct. 9, 1998
"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process." -Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998
"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies." -- Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999
"There is no doubt that ... Saddam Hussein has reinvigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies." Letter to President Bush, Signed by: -- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), and others, Dec 5, 2001
"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and th! e means of delivering them." -- Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002
"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country." -- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002
"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power." -- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002
"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction." -- Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002
"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..." -- Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002
"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force -- if necessary -- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security." -- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002
"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years ... We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction." -- Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002
"He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do" -- Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002
"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons." -- Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002
"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction." -- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002
"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real..." -- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003
Wow...you're still on this thread being stupid?
That's some serious preserverance...
^lol^
is that the word for...can't answer questions so ad hominem...can't defend stance so ad hominem...
fits you to a tee!
Like I said - too much Hannity. At least I don't lie to make a point.
And I answered your question; you have an inability to listen. Frankly, I have never heard someone sound quite so retarded regarding terrorism, and what its goals are w/ regard to the U.S., and how it has contributed to our economic situation.
It's a little scary that people can't make even the simplest connections like that, but kind of funny, too.
Like I said - too much Hannity. At least I don't lie to make a point.
And I answered your question; you have an inability to listen. Frankly, I have never heard someone sound quite so retarded regarding terrorism, and what its goals are w/ regard to the U.S., and how it has contributed to our economic situation.
It's a little scary that people can't make even the simplest connections like that, but kind of funny, too.
BAC - can you show me where on this thread that I said it was solely the Republicans fault, or even brought up Democrats & Republicans as they relate to the disaster known as Iraq?
The discussion here is how OBL caused the U.S. to deteriorate economically, as was his stated goal. Our reaction to 9/11 certainly helped his cause in that regard, which is the argument I'm making, and which I think is fairly indisputable.
Still, that doesn't stop you from yet again chiming in that the village idiot here "has a point."
And while I accept that both Dems & Republicans are complicit in this war, you & I will always disagree about the measure of accountability that lies with Bush, who was a willing patsy for PNAC. Yes, everyone else went along with it, but there is a special place in hell for the ones who put it out there in the first place.
BAC, you have a really - and I mean REALLY - bad habit of putting words in people's mouths. It's annoying, and beyond that, makes a rational discussion impossible.
If you wouldn't mind, I'd appreciate it if you wouldn't respond to my posts anymore.